Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options to
solve this recurring dilemma folks have with Field.Keyword indexed
fields and QueryParser?
I think one could introduce a special syntax in query parser for
keyword fields. Query parser wouldn't
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
On Oct 21, 2004, at 2:38 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Erik Hatcher writes:
however perhaps it should be. Or perhaps there are other options
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
QueryParser that should deal this problems.
I'm just a
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was indexed
though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a general-purpose
QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide some subclasses of
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Oct 21, 2004, at 5:38 AM, sergiu gordea wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I don't like the idea of users having to know how a field was
indexed though. That seems to defeat the purpose of a
general-purpose QueryParser.
Erik
I agree that, but maybe lucene should provide
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field (keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to `Elections'
and `2004'.
So I guess he has to write an identity analyzer himself unless there is
one provided
AFIK if the term Election 2004 will be between quotation marks this should
work fine.
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran
: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field
(keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I
that the query parser is already geared up to do
regards
Rupinder
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 October 2004 16:29
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Null or no analyzer
On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Aviran wrote:
AFIK if the term Election 2004
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token
List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field (keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I guess he has to write an identity analyzer
, 2004 2:25 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: RE: Null or no analyzer
Aviran writes:
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Can he? If Elections 2004 is one token in the subject field (keyword),
this will fail, since WhiteSpeceAnalyzer will tokenize that to
`Elections'
and `2004'.
So I
You can use WhiteSpaceAnalyzer
Aviran
http://aviran.mordos.com
-Original Message-
From: Rupinder Singh Mazara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:23 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Null or no analyzer
Hi All
I have a question regarding selection of
13 matches
Mail list logo
