___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
kernel
currently in tree.
support for build with 2.6.20 and RHEL5/fc6 kernels in bugzilla
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11647
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https
-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
on slackware..
Many thanks
Prashant
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
, but at least it
compiles, mounts and survives long enough to write this mail :)
[There were problems with gcc-4.1, better go and use gcc-3.4]
Location as usual:
http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/lustre/1.6/
Enjoy and report bugs to me,
Bernd
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team, Cluster filesystem
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss
/include/libcfs/winnt/kp30.h was missing for the patch to succeed.
/configure --with-linux=/usr/src/kernels/2.6.18-8.1.4.el5-x86_64/
CC=/usr/bin/gcc34
Whats wrong?
is you regenerate configure after aplly patches? this should be done
with 'sh autogen.sh', seems not.
--
Alexey Lyashkov
/mpirun --hostfile hosts -np 32 ./open /mnt/testfs/rjh
open of '/mnt/testfs/rjh/blk016.dat' failed on rank 16, hostname 'x15'
open: No such file or directory
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team, Cluster filesystem
___
Lustre-discuss
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-discuss@clusterfs.com
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL
Hi Robin,
Thanks for sumbit bug, but looks client log is to short, can you check
it? is sysctl variable 'lnet.debug' set to -1 ?
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 00:31 -0400, Robin Humble wrote:
Hi Alexey,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:36:23PM +0300, Alexey Lyashkov wrote:
can you replicate this bug
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 20:36 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
4) Is O_DIRECT supported at the application level?
Works for me.
using mixed normal and O_DIRECT access need to be sure fixes from bugs
11662 and 12371 is applied.
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team, Cluster
.
[362113.174288] Lustre: 14609:0:(namei.c:235:ll_mdc_blocking_ast()) More than
1 alias dir 13526800 alias 2
warning from first variant of fix 12123. bug has updated patch to remove
this warning (att 10448).
Is it a know problem?
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL
of file with patch.
after it you need rebuild lustre from sources (i'm not sure patch is
applied cleanly but it trivially adjusted).
Also you need nfs-tools with applied patch from bug and kernel with
extra patch.
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team, Cluster filesystem
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 03:10 -0400, Robin Humble wrote:
Hi,
Re: rhel5 x86_64 Lustre 1.6.2 packages.
I get this whenever I umount a Lustre filesystem. is it important?
This not important, this just warning and will be fixed in next release.
--
Alexey Lyashkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beaver team
16 matches
Mail list logo
