[Lustre-discuss] Single client performance

2010-03-11 Thread David Simas
Hello, I've got a Lustre system where I'd like to improve single client write performance, The Lustre manual reads "Lustre single client node throughput has been measured at 2 GB/s (max)" (section 1.1.1 Lustre Key Features), and the web site http://docs.hp.com/en/SFSUGG3-D/apas02.html

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installation error

2010-03-11 Thread David Dillow
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 16:55 +0530, Vineet ghatge wrote: > Can someone suggest why i encountered this? I have installed all > packages in Red hat Linux 9. May I suggest you update to distribution that is more recent? RHL 9 came out in 2003 IIRC, and sported a nifty 2.4 vintage kernel. It is not s

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Trouble compiling lustre sources

2010-03-11 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
Thank you. Just signed up. ~Lawrence Rosie Krupski wrote: > Hi All, I think I accidentally hit the wrong button on this so I'm > forwarding to the list. > > Lawrence, You may want to consider, if you haven't already, signing > up for the list so that your emails are automatically approved. >

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Trouble compiling lustre sources

2010-03-11 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2010-03-11, at 11:58, Lawrence Sorrillo wrote: > Lustre 1.8.2 supports 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (EL5u4), however, we have > 24GB > on our machine so we use 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE. This also seems to > be a problem. I thought that since the 2.6.18-164 was supported > getting lustre to > accommod

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Trouble compiling lustre sources

2010-03-11 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
Nicolas: Lustre 1.8.2 supports 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (EL5u4), however, we have 24GB on our machine so we use 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5PAE. This also seems to be a problem. I thought that since the 2.6.18-164 was supported getting lustre to accommodate the "PAE" would not be difficult, but I have failed

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Trouble compiling lustre sources

2010-03-11 Thread Rosie Krupski
Hi All, I think I accidentally hit the wrong button on this so I'm forwarding to the list. Lawrence, You may want to consider, if you haven't already, signing up for the list so that your emails are automatically approved. http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss To: Nicola

Re: [Lustre-discuss] oss_num_threads & oss_num_create_threads

2010-03-11 Thread Johann Lombardi
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:43:28AM -0600, Hendelman, Rob wrote: > I'd like to make sure that I understand these 2 module options. > > >From googling a bit & searching bugzilla, here is my understanding: > > oss_num_threads = Maximum number of service threads across all ost's on a > single OSS. >

[Lustre-discuss] oss_num_threads & oss_num_create_threads

2010-03-11 Thread Hendelman, Rob
I'd like to make sure that I understand these 2 module options. >From googling a bit & searching bugzilla, here is my understanding: oss_num_threads = Maximum number of service threads across all ost's on a single OSS. oss_num_create_threads = minimum number of threads across all ost's on a sing

[Lustre-discuss] Trouble compiling lustre sources

2010-03-11 Thread Lawrence Sorrillo
Does anyone monitor this list? ___ Lustre-discuss mailing list Lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss

[Lustre-discuss] lfs and df

2010-03-11 Thread Brian Andrus
Hello, New(ish) to lustre, but have a quick question that I cannot seem to find anything about. In version 1.6, 'lfs df ' shows *all* mounted lustre filesystems. On a box that I put the 1.8 client/modules, it only shows the last filesystem mounted unless I specifically request it (eg: df /work).

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Installation error

2010-03-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 16:55 +0530, Vineet ghatge wrote: > Hi all, Hi, > I tried running lustre on Red hat linux 9 i got a list of errors as > shown below:- What is Red Hat linux 9? Red Hat Enterprise Linux is only at "5" currently with 6 coming shortly, AFAIU. > [r...@localhost software]# rpm

[Lustre-discuss] Installation error

2010-03-11 Thread Vineet ghatge
Hi all, I tried running lustre on Red hat linux 9 i got a list of errors as shown below:- [r...@localhost software]# rpm -ivh kernel-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.2.i686.rpm error: Failed dependencies: module-init-tools is needed by kernel-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.2 initscripts >= 8.11.1-1