No, we will only have a single samba server sharing out lustre-backed
files. What do you mean in a way similar to samba? What does samba do
that is different? We are using lustre to replace our old nfs server
for serving up home directories in our cluster and the rest of our
systems.
On Fri, Aug
Well the samba server will be just for that, but we only have the
single filesystem '/lustre' So because of that I'm going to have to
put the flock option on all of the clients? this was my original
question.
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Mark Hahn h...@mcmaster.ca wrote:
No, we will only
Hello!
Similar as in some app whose locking would conflict with samba locks in a way
to protect
updates by samba from updates from those apps at the same time should they
happen
in the same moment of time.
Now that I think about it, I remember that samba does not really use flock, but
rather
We have several ten servers and thousands of compute nodes which are still
running lustre-1.6.7.2. on several HPC clusters. I would like to know:
- When will lustre-1.6.x.x retire? Does Oracle still maintain and upgrade it
to new version?
- Where can I download it? Looks like the download link
1.6.x went EOL on June 30th. It is no longer on the download site,
though the tags should still be accessible from the Lustre group git
repository.
Daneil Goodman wrote:
We have several ten servers and thousands of compute nodes which are
still running lustre-1.6.7.2. on several HPC
On 2010-08-30, at 14:04, Daneil Goodman wrote:
We have several ten servers and thousands of compute nodes which are still
running lustre-1.6.7.2. on several HPC clusters. I would like to know:
- When will lustre-1.6.x.x retire?
It was announced in the last LUG, etc that support for 1.6.x
Actually there was a bug fixed in 1.8.4 when obdo structures can be
allocated and freed outside of OBDO_ALLOC/OBDO_FREE macros. That could
lead to the slab fragmentation and pseudo-leak.
The patch is in the attachment 30664 for bz 21980
Dmitry
Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2010-08-26, at 18:42,
