Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Building lustre client on Debian fails

2023-10-02 Thread Jan Andersen
Yes, that worked! Thanks again. /jan On 02/10/2023 10:06, Tancheff, Shaun wrote: Not to worry. Clients do not care what the server uses for backing disk (ldiskfs or zfs). It is technically redundant ... when --disable-server is specified ldiskfs and zfs are also disabled. On 10/2/23, 3:25

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Building lustre client on Debian fails

2023-10-02 Thread Tancheff, Shaun via lustre-discuss
Not to worry. Clients do not care what the server uses for backing disk (ldiskfs or zfs). It is technically redundant ... when --disable-server is specified ldiskfs and zfs are also disabled. On 10/2/23, 3:25 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Jan Andersen" wrote: Hi Shaun, Thank you

Re: [lustre-discuss] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Building lustre client on Debian fails

2023-10-02 Thread Jan Andersen
Hi Shaun, Thank you your reply. What you say about Debian 12 is a bit worrying: "--disable-ldiskfs" - I use ldiskfs on the servers, I hope this isn't relevant on the clients? /jan On 30/09/2023 09:15, Tancheff, Shaun wrote: I tried Debian 5.10.0-22 kernel and had no issues with tag 2.15.3.