Hi there,
in addition to the ongoing very interesting discussion on RH technique
I have a practical problem / question.
When playing thumb-out and alternate m-i stroke I find it next to
impossible reach with the fingers downwards beyond the a string without
touching with the
[1]https://youtu.be/XKIHIX8R870
observe his right hand>>
can't wait for the conversation ???!!!l let's see what all he lute
experts have to say
By the way he gave a concert in Berkeley several month ago
enjoy
Hermann
--
References
1. https://youtu.be/XKIHIX8R870
Yes, that's why I drink as much booze as I possibly can to have at least that
aspect of my playing historically correct.
Best,
Matthew
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 17:04, howard posner wrote:
>
> BTW, your selection of pictures proves conclusively that all early
> 17th-century lutenists had red
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Matthew Daillie wrote:
>
> There are passages in pieces by Vallet where he indicates a thumb-index
> alternation in diminutions on the 4th to 6th courses of the lute but this
> does not mean that he was using thumb-in (since he seems to specifically to
> deride
There are passages in pieces by Vallet where he indicates a thumb-index
alternation in diminutions on the 4th to 6th courses of the lute but this does
not mean that he was using thumb-in (since he seems to specifically to deride
the use of this in his introduction). There are no indications for
Thumb out does not rule out alternating strokes of thumb and index, p -
i is feasible with thumb out as well.
Even someone as late as Charles Mouton has it in his double on
Gaultier's Belle Homicide, to quote just one example.
Mathias
I am literally crushed. (But I will nevertheless keep on putting the
heaviest volumes on the lower shelves in my house, just in case God
sends the Big One to California).
On 8/1/19 2:30 PM, howard posner wrote:
On Aug 1, 2019, at 2:10 PM, Alain Veylit wrote:
This 19th century pianist and
Yes, it was definitely the Talmud that Alkan was almost certainly not trying to
reach when the bookcase almost certainly did not fall on him.
While Tristan has a point, facetious I’m sure, about the collective weight of
the Talmud being potentially fatal, it’s a bunch of volumes, so if it falls
I think you are right about the Talmud. My memory of the episode is
murky as Hell!
On 8/1/19 2:20 PM, Tristan von Neumann wrote:
This is a legend about Charles Valentin Alkan.
I don't really know if it's true though :)
It was probably the Talmud which has enough weight to crush you. No need
Thanks. The Talmud gets two points. :)
On 8/1/19 2:21 PM, [1]terli...@aol.com wrote:
Alkan of course... but I heard it was the Talmud that did him in.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
Get the new AOL app: [2]mail.mobile.aol.com
On Thursday, August 1, 2019, Alain
Veylit [3] wrote:
10 matches
Mail list logo
