cs.dartmouth.edu
[mailto:[3]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Ron
Andrico
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:35 PM
To: Frank A. Gerbode, M.D.; Jussi-Pekka Lajunen;
[4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Numbers in a battle (Eysert), part 2
lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
[mailto:[3]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of Ron
Andrico
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:35 PM
To: Frank A. Gerbode, M.D.; Jussi-Pekka Lajunen;
[4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Numbers in a battle
..@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
on behalf of Frank A. Gerbode,
M.D.
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:45 PM
To: Jussi-Pekka Lajunen ; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Numbers in a battle (Eysert), part 2
Oh! I didn't find that score. Thanks so much! One appr
A. Gerbode,
M.D.
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:45 PM
To: Jussi-Pekka Lajunen ; lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Numbers in a battle (Eysert), part 2
Oh! I didn't find that score. Thanks so much! One approach would be
to
intabulate the missing parts from
Oh! I didn't find that score. Thanks so much! One approach would be to
intabulate the missing parts from the score, as a second lute part
(maybe using red notes) or just to fill them in so a single lute could
play the complete piece.
Since the first part does not have gaps or red notes, it,
No, I haven't seen, but the numbers correspond to the duration of rests
in the first choir's part (and the nine semibreve long section not
included in the tablature). If you look at the score[1], you can see
there are rests that last for two semibreves on page 25, for five
semibreves on page
Well, as we have discussed, the red notes are apparently played from
the same score on a second lute, and elsewhere in Eysert, there are
apparently both parts of some duets, some reversed to play off the same
MS (haven't run across them yet). That suggests that there may not be a
The Secunda pars" is "Seconda Parte" of Battaglia by Orazio Vecchi. See
page 25:
http://ks.petruccimusiclibrary.org/files/imglnks/usimg/4/41/IMSLP145459-WIMA.26bd-battu.pdf
Also see:
https://i.imgur.com/fhZWglm.png
I guess the second choir's part is not in the same lute book. It would
not
Hmmm. I don't see another version of the Battaglia. There is a Part 1
(same file), which has 72 bars, where part 2 has 55. If we add a total
of 30 interpolated bars to part 2, we get 85 bars, so the bar numbers
still wouldn't fit between the two parts, and I have not tried to see
They seem to indicate the duration of rests. In this case there are no
red notes. I wonder if there is a intabulation of the second choir's
part elsewhere in the manuscript.
See:
https://imslp.org/wiki/Special:ImagefromIndex/145459/sv06
Frank A. Gerbode, M.D. kirjoitti 8.9.2020 klo 18.47:
10 matches
Mail list logo
