Get a folding theorbo.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 10, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Benjamin Narvey luthi...@gmail.com wrote:
H. Still no thoughts?
Sent from my iPad
On 07 Mar 2015, at 23:20, BENJAMIN NARVEY [1]luthi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear collected wisdom,
I'm rather
Hi Benjamin,
Why not shorten the neck extension?
In that case you would not have to worry about the number of frets and the
resulting decrease (maybe op to 10 cm. of diapason for the base strings) would
possibly not make that much of a difference acoustically.
Greetings,
Lex van Sante
Op 10
Benjamin,
As someone else mentioned, you could consider shortening the extension.
I wonder if you might even be able to keep the original length. I
imagine a skilled wood worker could make a joint that would allow you
to swap out the bits for in-town or travel modes. This is purely
Dear All,
Thanks so much for your thoughts. Indeed, I may be getting a folding theorbo -
I'd prefer a Flybo to a Guitarbo any day - but I may still have to take the
stopped string length down a bit.
Shaun: yes, I would prefer a whopping huge body with fewer frets than to have a
smaller
H. Still no thoughts?
Sent from my iPad
On 07 Mar 2015, at 23:20, BENJAMIN NARVEY [1]luthi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear collected wisdom,
I'm rather wondering what the minimum number of tied frets is for
historical lute instruments, notably for theorbo(s). I am
