It's also noted in the article that Wyssenbach uses the same
notation in his 'Tabulatura uff die lutten' of 1550.
Isn't that one a copy of the Italian book?
Rainer
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
On 06.03.2017 13:41, Roman Turovsky wrote:
Wikipedia has strict rules against original research, and all information
it permits has to externally documented with reliable scholarly sources.
RT
I can confirm that! I once tried to change an entry about a piece "that
W.A. Mozart had composed in
list <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Earliest printed tablature with ornaments
Dear Denys, Rainer
I was thinking of the Libro Ottavo, too, but found the same pattern in
Intabulatura di Lauto del Divino FdM & del eccelente PPB da Milano � Libro
Secondo, Venice, 1546.
Dear Denys, Rainer
I was thinking of the Libro Ottavo, too, but found the same pattern in
Intabulatura di Lauto del Divino FdM & del eccelente PPB da Milano … Libro
Secondo, Venice, 1546.
First instance in this book: First pavana, last system of 2nd page (m. 71), the
third cipher is one too
I couldn't say without looking. I'm remembering a reference by Diana Poulton to
an ornament where there are two tablature letters (in brackets if I remember
correctly) of which only the first is plucked. Best wishes, Denys
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Mar 2017, at 16:23, Rainer
Libro ottavo?
If so, which piece?
Rainer
On 06.03.2017 15:58, jo.lued...@t-online.de wrote:
Dear Rainer, dear list
There is an ornament indication which can be interpreted as an
appogiatura sign in Francesco da Milano & Pietro Paulo Borrono:
Intavolatura di Lauto, Milano 1548.
Dear Rainer, I don't have my books to hand just now, but If I remember
correctly I think there is some ornamentation in one or more of the Borrono
prints - I will look it up later. Best wishes, Denys
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Mar 2017, at 10:49, Rainer wrote:
>
>
Oops, sorry I misremembered the hold signs.
__
From: Rainer <rads.bera_g...@t-online.de>
To: Lute net <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Monday, 6 March 2017, 6:47
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Earliest print
.
__
From: Rainer <rads.bera_g...@t-online.de>
To: Lute net <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Monday, 6 March 2017, 6:47
Subject: [LUTE] Re: Earliest printed tablature with ornaments
I am not at al
Date: 06/03/2017 12:41
To: "Rainer"<rads.bera_g...@t-online.de>, "Lute Net"<lute@cs.dartmouth.
edu>
Subj: [LUTE] Re: Earliest printed tablature with ornaments
Wikipedia has strict rules against original research, and all
information
it permits has to externally do
I am not at all interested in discussing Wikipedia's policy.
I simply wanted to know if anybody knows any printed tablature before barley
with ornaments.
And I really do not want to receive every reply twice.
Rainer
On 06.03.2017 13:41, Roman Turovsky wrote:
Wikipedia has strict rules
Wikipedia has strict rules against original research, and all information
it permits has to externally documented with reliable scholarly sources.
RT
On 3/6/2017 7:31 AM, Rainer wrote:
Of course, Wiki is unreliable.
And - of course - there is no reason to believe the citation is
incorrect.
Of course, Wiki is unreliable.
And - of course - there is no reason to believe the citation is incorrect.
However, why do you think I have asked for prints before 1596?
Barley has ornaments.
Rainer
As usual you have pressed reply to all :)
On 06.03.2017 12:32, Ron Andrico wrote:
While
as to Wikipedia -
it has been trustworthy in most fields of knowledge, with the exception
of those areas
that are politically contested (this is obviously not limited to
Bakfark's ethnicity.).
But even those areas are not in a bad shape.
RT
On 3/6/2017 6:32 AM, Ron Andrico wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo