[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee

Yes, this is what I meant: lively, yet not in all cases lovely. On 11/09/2017 08:13 AM, howard posner wrote: Sad news. He kept the list alive You mean lively? -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee

4]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee Sad news. He kept the list alive and his work in publishing was significant, although perhaps primarily for guitar players. Perhaps the last representant of a generation that considered lute music a sub-set of cla

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee

2017 16:48 Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu Betreff: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee Sad news. He kept the list alive and his work in publishing was significant, although perhaps primarily for guitar players. Perhaps the last representant of a generation that considered lute music a sub-set of classical

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee

> On Nov 9, 2017, at 7:48 AM, Alain Veylit wrote: > > Sad news. He kept the list alive You mean lively? To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee

Sad news. He kept the list alive and his work in publishing was significant, although perhaps primarily for guitar players. Perhaps the last representant of a generation that considered lute music a sub-set of classical guitar music. On 11/09/2017 07:35 AM, Bruno Cognyl-Fournier wrote:

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

- Original Message - From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; gary digman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:54 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist MO is not defending his views. He undermines our right to ours

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist MO is not defending his views. He undermines our right to ours. As to fairness: start your own list and see if your fairness would survive such a test. RT It doesn't seem quite fair to me to continue to discuss

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

, Gary Digman - Original Message - From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; gary digman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:54 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist MO is not defending his views. He

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

- Original Message - From: Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: lutelist lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; gary digman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:54 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist MO is not defending his views. He undermines our right to ours

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

See: http://www.livejournal.com/users/matanya/ for documental evidence. Alain gary digman wrote: Dear All; It doesn't seem quite fair to me to continue to discuss Matanya and his views on sundrie matters without allowing him the opportunity to respond and/or defend those views.

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

Allow me to add that MO used to run a guitar list himself (now defunct). He kicked me off the list after I opined that publishing 3rd and 4th rate guitar music from the 19th century (in critical editions no less) was a waste of scholarly energy, so evidently he is in favor of list control and

[LUTE] Re: Matanya Ophee and the lutelist

MO is not defending his views. He undermines our right to ours. As to fairness: start your own list and see if your fairness would survive such a test. RT It doesn't seem quite fair to me to continue to discuss Matanya and his views on sundrie matters without allowing him the opportunity