On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:27:38PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> > good page that, i've read it before but not for some time. IMO a
> > useful addition to it would be a list of authoritative servers that
> > use bind9 RFC-1034 zonefiles.
>
> You know, they kind of _could_ have called that format the
Oh, meant to add:
> > - powerdns is serious overkill for my needs (home server with only a
> >few domains).
>
> Yeah. $WORK did a massive conversion of hundreds of domains from BIND9
> to PowerDNS Authoritative Server, and there were various problems along
> the way. I'm not convinced it
Quoting Craig Sanders (c...@taz.net.au):
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:12:07AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> > _But_ that is completely unrelated to pdnsd.
>
> ah, my mistake. i assumed he was talking about powerdns.
No worries. ;->
> > http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Network_Other/dns-servers.html
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 01:12:07AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> _But_ that is completely unrelated to pdnsd.
ah, my mistake. i assumed he was talking about powerdns.
> http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Network_Other/dns-servers.html
good page that, i've read it before but not for some time. IMO a useful
Quoting Craig Sanders (c...@taz.net.au):
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:10:43AM +1000, zlin...@virginbroadband.com.au
> wrote:
> > I am using pdnsd
>
> FYI, I saw this DSA come in a few days ago:
>
> https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3664
>
> Debian Security Advisory
> DSA-3664-1 pdns
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:10:43AM +1000, zlin...@virginbroadband.com.au wrote:
> I am using pdnsd
FYI, I saw this DSA come in a few days ago:
https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3664
Debian Security Advisory
DSA-3664-1 pdns -- security update
Date Reported: 10 Sep 2016
Affected
