Andrew Pam via luv-main
writes:
> On 15/01/16 08:46, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
>> try my msygrep script.
>>
>> http://taz.net.au/~cas/msytools/
>
> Very handy! Unfortunately fetch-MSY.sh uses bashisms but only calls for
> /bin/sh which isn't necessarily /bin/bash -
"Trent W. Buck via luv-main" writes:
> Tim Connors wrote:
>> msy? That looks nifty
>
> http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/msy
> http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/foldr
>
> Not using XSLT I'm afraid.
Ta-daaa!
I was angry enough at my script that I rewrote it.
Now it uses XSLT instead of a
On 15/01/16 11:28, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
>> Where do I find untable.pl ?
>
> sorry, i forgot fetch-MSY.sh needed that.
>
> it's in the same web directory now.
Thanks Craig! Works perfectly now.
Cheers,
Andrew
___
luv-main mailing
Tim Connors wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote:
>
> > $ msy | foldr grep -Fi -- 2tb 3.5 sata3 7200
>
> msy? That looks nifty, given how horrible browsing the pictures on their
> webshite is.
>
> details?
http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/msy
On 15/01/16 08:46, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> try my msygrep script.
>
> http://taz.net.au/~cas/msytools/
Very handy! Unfortunately fetch-MSY.sh uses bashisms but only calls for
/bin/sh which isn't necessarily /bin/bash - including on my machine.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:54:42AM +1100, Tim Connors wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote:
>
> > $ msy | foldr grep -Fi -- 2tb 3.5 sata3 7200
>
> msy? That looks nifty, given how horrible browsing the pictures on their
> webshite is.
>
> details?
try my msygrep
, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB
steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No
matter what I tried, I couldn't get windows to make the option available
in its Disk Manager GUI - it was there, just greyed out.
I gave up and expanded the main partition...
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 05:17:12 PM Julien Goodwin via luv-main wrote:
> SMR/Archive is something to avoid unless you're going to use the drives
> like tape given the ~200MB block size for writes.
...and if you do want to use an SMR drive you need to avoid kernels between
3.18.21 and 4.4.0-rc3,
cause ReadyBoost caches to a file, not a disk/partition.
> I discovered this just last week after upgrading my win7 games box to
> have an SSD as a boot disk, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB
> steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No
> matter what I
USB Flash for write-back caching.
> I discovered this just last week after upgrading my win7 games box to
> have an SSD as a boot disk, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB
> steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No
> matter what I tried, I coul
Russell Coker via luv-main
writes:
> http://cdn.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_drive
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shingled_magnetic_recording
>
> Are SSHDs any good?
AFAICT the only reason SSHDs exist are:
* Windows has nothing like
On 13 January 2016 at 13:28, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote:
> Russell Coker via luv-main
> writes:
>
> > http://cdn.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_drive
> >
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:04:42AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> I'm not using any ZIL or SSD L2ARC on the backup pool so having the
> 4GB SSD cache (per drive) on it is probably beneficial.
my mistake. it's actually 8GB not 4GB.
craig
--
craig sanders
BOFH excuse #416:
en't done
any performance testing (the urgency of the upgrade - the backup pool
had hit 90+% utilisation which is around where ZFS peformance goes to
absolute shit - precluded running bonnie++ before use) but they seem
reasonably fast to me, for magnetic spinning disks. they're certainly
no worse than n
Quoting Julien Goodwin (luv-li...@studio442.com.au):
> SSHD = classic HDD with some SSD caching
As the maintainer of http://linuxmafia.com/ssh/ I looked forward to
a long thread mutt told me had Subject header SSHD, hoping to hear about
some SSH daemons I'd not previously discove
" 3.5" SATA Internal Hard Disk Drive"
" PRICE"
Seagate 3.5" SSHD 1TB / 2TB / 4TB / Seagate 3.5" Archive 6TB / 8TB
105/135/219/249/309"
ie Seagate 3.5" Archive is rotating-rust !
see
http://www.se
On 12/01/16 17:18, Tennessee Leeuwenburg via luv-main wrote:
Based on my general new article reading, I thought everything above 6GB
was using shingled storage which doesn't interest me so much. I'd be
interested if you find out otherwise.
There's some 6T & even (I believe, but can't find) 8T
that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the storage:price
ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS
optimising write patterns for it.
--
My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au
'm guessing
> that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the
> storage:price
> ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS
> optimising write patterns for it.
>
> --
> My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au
regular technology, suspiciously cheap. I'm guessing
that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the storage:price
ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS
optimising write patterns for it.
SSHD's are fine, but what you've linked to is an Archive / SMR
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 07:34:17PM +1000, Chris Samuel (ch...@csamuel.org)
wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:41:10 PM Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
- external firewall blocks the entire network of 43.0.0.0/24
Was that meant to be 43.0.0.0/8 instead? It won't match the IP in question
otherwise
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:41:10 PM Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
Now the thing is that hosts.deny sits before I can see the
traffic with tcpdump/ngrep/iptraf, so this makes it a little
harder to debug.
No, you should still the initial 3 way handshake (SYN, SYN+ACK, ACK) as that's
required to set up
delivers following email every random minutes:
THE_HOSTNAME: Host denied: sshd from 43.255.189.72(unknown)-43.255.189.72
Normally it would not bother me, but the fact this machine is behind a DMZ and
a FIREWALL makes this interesting.
I, too, know the machine (and network) in question are quite
23 matches
Mail list logo