Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Trent W. Buck via luv-main
Andrew Pam via luv-main writes: > On 15/01/16 08:46, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote: >> try my msygrep script. >> >> http://taz.net.au/~cas/msytools/ > > Very handy! Unfortunately fetch-MSY.sh uses bashisms but only calls for > /bin/sh which isn't necessarily /bin/bash -

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Trent W. Buck via luv-main
"Trent W. Buck via luv-main" writes: > Tim Connors wrote: >> msy? That looks nifty > > http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/msy > http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/foldr > > Not using XSLT I'm afraid. Ta-daaa! I was angry enough at my script that I rewrote it. Now it uses XSLT instead of a

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Andrew Pam via luv-main
On 15/01/16 11:28, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote: >> Where do I find untable.pl ? > > sorry, i forgot fetch-MSY.sh needed that. > > it's in the same web directory now. Thanks Craig! Works perfectly now. Cheers, Andrew ___ luv-main mailing

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Trent W. Buck via luv-main
Tim Connors wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote: > > > $ msy | foldr grep -Fi -- 2tb 3.5 sata3 7200 > > msy? That looks nifty, given how horrible browsing the pictures on their > webshite is. > > details? http://www.cyber.com.au/~twb/.bin/msy

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Andrew Pam via luv-main
On 15/01/16 08:46, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote: > try my msygrep script. > > http://taz.net.au/~cas/msytools/ Very handy! Unfortunately fetch-MSY.sh uses bashisms but only calls for /bin/sh which isn't necessarily /bin/bash - including on my machine. Thanks, Andrew

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-14 Thread Craig Sanders via luv-main
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:54:42AM +1100, Tim Connors wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote: > > > $ msy | foldr grep -Fi -- 2tb 3.5 sata3 7200 > > msy? That looks nifty, given how horrible browsing the pictures on their > webshite is. > > details? try my msygrep

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-13 Thread Craig Sanders via luv-main
, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No matter what I tried, I couldn't get windows to make the option available in its Disk Manager GUI - it was there, just greyed out. I gave up and expanded the main partition...

Re: SSHD

2016-01-13 Thread Chris Samuel via luv-main
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 05:17:12 PM Julien Goodwin via luv-main wrote: > SMR/Archive is something to avoid unless you're going to use the drives > like tape given the ~200MB block size for writes. ...and if you do want to use an SMR drive you need to avoid kernels between 3.18.21 and 4.4.0-rc3,

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-13 Thread Trent W. Buck via luv-main
cause ReadyBoost caches to a file, not a disk/partition. > I discovered this just last week after upgrading my win7 games box to > have an SSD as a boot disk, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB > steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No > matter what I

Re: SSHD (and steam and windows and other stuff)

2016-01-13 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
USB Flash for write-back caching. > I discovered this just last week after upgrading my win7 games box to > have an SSD as a boot disk, decided to try ReadyBoost for my main 2TB > steam library drive (not an SSHD) so made a 40GB partition for it. No > matter what I tried, I coul

Re: SSHD

2016-01-12 Thread Trent W. Buck via luv-main
Russell Coker via luv-main writes: > http://cdn.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_drive > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shingled_magnetic_recording > > Are SSHDs any good? AFAICT the only reason SSHDs exist are: * Windows has nothing like

Re: SSHD

2016-01-12 Thread Colin Fee via luv-main
On 13 January 2016 at 13:28, Trent W. Buck via luv-main wrote: > Russell Coker via luv-main > writes: > > > http://cdn.msy.com.au/Parts/PARTS.pdf > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_drive > >

Re: SSHD

2016-01-12 Thread Craig Sanders via luv-main
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:04:42AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > I'm not using any ZIL or SSD L2ARC on the backup pool so having the > 4GB SSD cache (per drive) on it is probably beneficial. my mistake. it's actually 8GB not 4GB. craig -- craig sanders BOFH excuse #416:

Re: SSHD

2016-01-12 Thread Craig Sanders via luv-main
en't done any performance testing (the urgency of the upgrade - the backup pool had hit 90+% utilisation which is around where ZFS peformance goes to absolute shit - precluded running bonnie++ before use) but they seem reasonably fast to me, for magnetic spinning disks. they're certainly no worse than n

Re: SSHD

2016-01-12 Thread Rick Moen via luv-main
Quoting Julien Goodwin (luv-li...@studio442.com.au): > SSHD = classic HDD with some SSD caching As the maintainer of http://linuxmafia.com/ssh/ I looked forward to a long thread mutt told me had Subject header SSHD, hoping to hear about some SSH daemons I'd not previously discove

Re: SSHD

2016-01-11 Thread Rohan McLeod via luv-main
" 3.5" SATA Internal Hard Disk Drive" " PRICE" Seagate 3.5" SSHD 1TB / 2TB / 4TB / Seagate 3.5" Archive 6TB / 8TB 105/135/219/249/309" ie Seagate 3.5" Archive is rotating-rust ! see http://www.se

Re: SSHD

2016-01-11 Thread Julien Goodwin via luv-main
On 12/01/16 17:18, Tennessee Leeuwenburg via luv-main wrote: Based on my general new article reading, I thought everything above 6GB was using shingled storage which doesn't interest me so much. I'd be interested if you find out otherwise. There's some 6T & even (I believe, but can't find) 8T

SSHD

2016-01-11 Thread Russell Coker via luv-main
that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the storage:price ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS optimising write patterns for it. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Bloghttp://doc.coker.com.au

Re: SSHD

2016-01-11 Thread Tennessee Leeuwenburg via luv-main
'm guessing > that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the > storage:price > ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS > optimising write patterns for it. > > -- > My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au

Re: SSHD

2016-01-11 Thread Julien Goodwin via luv-main
regular technology, suspiciously cheap. I'm guessing that they use something like Shingled recording to improve the storage:price ratio and use the SSHD caching to allow decent performance without the OS optimising write patterns for it. SSHD's are fine, but what you've linked to is an Archive / SMR

Re: Host denied: sshd from 43.255.189.72(unknown)-43.255.189.72

2015-07-01 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 07:34:17PM +1000, Chris Samuel (ch...@csamuel.org) wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:41:10 PM Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: - external firewall blocks the entire network of 43.0.0.0/24 Was that meant to be 43.0.0.0/8 instead? It won't match the IP in question otherwise

Re: Host denied: sshd from 43.255.189.72(unknown)-43.255.189.72

2015-07-01 Thread Chris Samuel
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:41:10 PM Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: Now the thing is that hosts.deny sits before I can see the traffic with tcpdump/ngrep/iptraf, so this makes it a little harder to debug. No, you should still the initial 3 way handshake (SYN, SYN+ACK, ACK) as that's required to set up

Host denied: sshd from 43.255.189.72(unknown)-43.255.189.72

2015-06-30 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach
delivers following email every random minutes: THE_HOSTNAME: Host denied: sshd from 43.255.189.72(unknown)-43.255.189.72 Normally it would not bother me, but the fact this machine is behind a DMZ and a FIREWALL makes this interesting. I, too, know the machine (and network) in question are quite