On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 07:56:37PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sunday, 11 March 2018 6:37:56 PM AEDT Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 07:49:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > Unlike BTRFS, you can expect every feature of ZFS to just work. It may be
> > > a
On Sunday, 11 March 2018 6:37:56 PM AEDT Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 07:49:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Unlike BTRFS, you can expect every feature of ZFS to just work. It may be
> > a total PITA to get it working, it may not be something you even want to
>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 07:49:48PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> Unlike BTRFS, you can expect every feature of ZFS to just work. It may be
> a total PITA to get it working, it may not be something you even want to
ZFS just works, and I've never found it to be a PITA at all. I've been using
it
On Friday, 9 March 2018 1:04:13 PM AEDT Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> I forgot to mention one very useful difference between 1. partitions & LVM
> Logical Volumes (LV) and 2. btrfs sub-volumes & ZFS datasets.
>
> Partitions & LVs are created with a fixed size. The size can be changed
>
I forgot to mention one very useful difference between 1. partitions & LVM
Logical Volumes (LV) and 2. btrfs sub-volumes & ZFS datasets.
Partitions & LVs are created with a fixed size. The size can be changed
later, but if you create a 50G /data partittion and a 100G /home partition
it's easily
