Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:47:04AM +0100, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
> Am 11.02.2020 um 10:20 schrieb Andrew Pullin:
> > [..]
> >
> > The part that I am stuck on presently is that Host2 has no knowledge of
> > how to route packets from PPP out to the WAN, say, 8.8.8.8.
> > Between
Am 11.02.2020 um 10:20 schrieb Andrew Pullin:
> [..]
>
> The part that I am stuck on presently is that Host2 has no knowledge of
> how to route packets from PPP out to the WAN, say, 8.8.8.8.
> Between ip4_forward, IP_FORWARD, ip4_route_src, LWIP_HOOK_IP4_ROUTE,
> LWIP_HOOK_IP4_ROUTE_SRC, and
On 1/31/2020 4:48 PM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Or how host3/C could be configured for routing a subnet (now
11.0.0.0/32) that is essentially "private" between host2/B and
host1/A. That is the "192.168.0.0/24 via 172.16.1.1" route in your
example, or "11.0.0.0/32 via 10.0.0.016" in my case.
It
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:11:23PM +0100, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> Well, yes, my bad. The question wasn't phrased well. The thing I don't
> understand (because I'm not using it) probably all boils down to using
> lwIP as a PPP 'proxy' to remote networks without doing NAT at the same
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:11:56AM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
> On 1/30/20 11:42 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> >
> > 10.0.0.1/32 and 10.0.0.2/32 are within 10.0.0.0/16 subnet, that
> > shouldn't be a problem here, this is usually a bad practice and it
> > should be avoided. This is a
On 1/30/20 11:42 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
There are no ARP in PPP, but whatever, this configuration is correct.
Roger that. At the very least, ARP is enabled on the NetX equivalent of
a netif on the PPP-only host.
But it must be inactive and not accomplishing anything.
10.0.0.1/32 and
Am 30.01.2020 um 22:02 schrieb Sylvain Rochet:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:31:11PM +0100, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 30.01.2020 um 20:42 schrieb Sylvain Rochet:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:15:11PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
Host2:
- Micontroller device, ESP32
- has both
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:31:11PM +0100, goldsi...@gmx.de wrote:
> Am 30.01.2020 um 20:42 schrieb Sylvain Rochet:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:15:11PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
> > >
> > > Host2:
> > > - Micontroller device, ESP32
> > > - has both WiFi and Ethernet PHY
Am 30.01.2020 um 20:42 schrieb Sylvain Rochet:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:15:11PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
Uh-oh, I think I did a poor job of explaining it. Although you seem to have
surmised most of it.
The full rundown:
Host1:
- Micontroller device with no MAC or PHY
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 08:15:11PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
>
> Uh-oh, I think I did a poor job of explaining it. Although you seem to have
> surmised most of it.
>
> The full rundown:
>
> Host1:
> - Micontroller device with no MAC or PHY
> - running NetX IP stack
> -
Hi,
On 2020-01-30 05:15, Andrew Pullin wrote:
On 1/29/20 5:42 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
Hi folks,
I am stuck on an issue here where I am trying to use lwip's
IP_FORWARDING
feature.
I am trying to forward packets
On 1/29/20 5:42 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
Hi folks,
I am stuck on an issue here where I am trying to use lwip's IP_FORWARDING
feature.
I am trying to forward packets between a PPP server netif and a WAN
interface. It is
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:57:19PM -0800, Andrew Pullin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am stuck on an issue here where I am trying to use lwip's IP_FORWARDING
> feature.
> I am trying to forward packets between a PPP server netif and a WAN
> interface. It is working on case, where the
13 matches
Mail list logo
