Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-07 Thread Tobias Guggemos
Hey Mohit, I see your point and that it is out of scope for the document. However, I feel the title and the abstract is then a bit misleading and should say that this document discusses security architectures and cryptographic functions for authentication/signing only? Just a thought to avoid mi

Re: [Lwip] WGLC for draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-03

2017-08-07 Thread Mohit Sethi
Hi Tobias The abstract does say that "The memo describes a possible deployment model suitable", the keyword being "a". I agree that the title is a bit broad but that is because in section 13 and 14, we discuss some broader trade offs of doing security at the different layers of the protocol s