Stefan Tomanek wrote:
Dies schrieb Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
[]
There's apparently no reason to run a script before
creating a netdev (pair). Note that we don't even
know which names will be used for the netdevs, at
least in general case.
I know, but there might be a point in
Dies schrieb Michael Tokarev (m...@tls.msk.ru):
I know, but there might be a point in executing a point script before
network configuration in general. I cannot thin of an example right now,
but Debian has the same distinction for its network configuration.
It occured to me too that you
Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Are we sure, we want to add these hooks (pre and post) ? I am not
against adding them, but IMO it is more sane to add them if needed
rather than adding something which may not be used.
Well, until now, there was not a single hook,
Stefan Tomanek wrote:
Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Are we sure, we want to add these hooks (pre and post) ? I am not
against adding them, but IMO it is more sane to add them if needed
rather than adding something which may not be used.
Well, until now, there was
On 10/08/2010 05:13 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Stefan Tomanek wrote:
Dies schrieb Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Are we sure, we want to add these hooks (pre and post) ? I am not
against adding them, but IMO it is more sane to add them if needed
rather than adding
08.10.2010 19:45, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[]
There IS a trivial way to extend system already (when
just ONE hook is implemented) - chain your scripts.
There's no need to re-implement shell in lxc.
Michael, I am not sure I get the idea. Can you elaborate a bit ?
In our case, we need the
