.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 2:27 AM, SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P psiv...@gmail.com
wrote:
lxc-attach works. But not able to find systemctl?
which version of systemd did you use inside the container?
did you ALSO have lxcfs on the host
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Dave Smith dave.sm...@candata.com wrote:
I never
could fine anything on a bridgeless veth setup and I would be curious to
read about this. If someone could point me to the link that would be great.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 6:58 AM, james harvey jamespharve...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to create a container that starts out being identical to my
top-level no-container installation. I want any changes performed
within the container to be kept in the container. I want anything
added to my
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:14 AM, james harvey jamespharve...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your primary goal?
... Part of me is wondering if I can overlayfs everything, and chroot
a terminal into the overlayfs mount. Not too worried about malicious
apps for my situation in Linux. Just want to
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:11 AM, SIVA SUBRAMANIAN.P psiv...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm compiling lxc in linux using yocto, how can I add systemd support to the
lxc containers.
Short version: you need up-to-date systemd on the container and
up-to-date lxc on the host (preferably 1.1.2, with lxcfs
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Oz Dror odr...@gmail.com wrote:
Does pactl list modules on the host show the module loaded and
correctly configured? An example output on my host setup
$ pactl info
Server String: unix:/run/user/1000/pulse/native
...
Is Local: yes
pactl info (in server
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Oz Dror odr...@gmail.com wrote:
# pactl list sinks
A soon as I connect the lxc guest all the sinks are lost and I have a
suspended sink
Then I am not able to play sound on either. Some times this sink changes to
the dummy sink. I can only recover from that
This is on fresh ubuntu 14.04, fully-updated, with bundled lxc? If
yes, it's a bug. Can you reproduce it on fresh installation (e.g. on
kvm/virtualbox)? If you haven't update it, it's possible that you ran
into some old bug.
FWIW, this is my main configuration choice for production systems:
of warnings,
but init applet error exists.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
Read the messages
(1)
/usr/share/lxc/templates/lxc-busybox: line 182: file: command not found
you don't have the necessary programs on your host (i.e. you don't
have file
Read the messages
(1)
/usr/share/lxc/templates/lxc-busybox: line 182: file: command not found
you don't have the necessary programs on your host (i.e. you don't
have file, usually installed as /usr/bin/file).
(2)
warning : busybox is not statically linked.
warning : The template script may
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Mark Constable ma...@renta.net wrote:
I thought I'd try going back to normal privileged containers which will at
least (or did pre-systemd) autostart.
Unprivileged (i.e. container root uid is non 0) can also autostart if
it is owned by root (i.e. located on
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Dietmar Maurer diet...@proxmox.com wrote:
using lxc 1.1.1, I downloaded a debian jessie based container with
But I am unable to start it (hangs in init):
# lxc-start -n 201 -F
Failed to mount cgroup at /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd: Permission denied
But it works
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Narahari Lakshminarayana
itsme.narah...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. finally I got some time to retry this and get this to progress. But I
have hit some roadblocks. I have pasted the log here. Please take a min
and advise what is possibly wrong.
I am trying to setup
/utopic.
--
Fajar
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
Short version: don't run systemd unpriviledged containers yet
(including vivid). Priviledged containers should work fine.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:51 AM, david.an...@bli.uzh.ch wrote:
It definitely
...@bli.uzh.ch wrote:
Thanks Fajar for the explanations!
I am going to stick to utopic for the time being :-)
David
-lxc-users lxc-users-boun...@lists.linuxcontainers.org wrote: -
To: LXC users mailing-list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
From: Fajar A. Nugraha
Sent by: lxc-users
Date
Short version: don't run systemd unpriviledged containers yet
(including vivid). Priviledged containers should work fine.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:51 AM, david.an...@bli.uzh.ch wrote:
It definitely is a problem of vivid in the container, although not only the
image.
After installing utopic
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Fırat KÜÇÜK firatku...@gmail.com wrote:
lxc.network.ipv4 = 213.X.X.31/32
lxc.network.ipv4.gateway = 193.X.X.1
I didn't know you can do that. Thanks.
container inerfaces file:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 213.X.X.31
netmask
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Fırat KÜÇÜK firatku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i updated the config file:
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 2048M
but my container free -h output shows 32GB
Is there anything that i missed?
Not really.
In most (all?) lxc setup, various tools (e.g. free,
lxc
then i created a container and edit conf-file
lxc.cgroup.memory.limit_in_bytes = 2048M
but it doesn't work.
In both cases i used free -h or cat /proc/meminfo
2015-04-29 11:09 GMT+03:00 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Fırat KÜÇÜK firatku...@gmail.com
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Fırat KÜÇÜK firatku...@gmail.com wrote:
I reinstalled the lxc, lxcfs service cannot start.
... because ?
There should be a log on /var/log/upstart/lxcfs.log.
Or you could try starting it manually:
/usr/bin/lxcfs -s -f -o allow_other /var/lib/lxcfs
--
Fajar
:/) failed: invalid request
WARNING: failed to escape to root cgroup
call to list_controllers failed: Method ListControllers with signature
on interface org.linuxcontainers.cgmanager0_0 doesn't exist
2015-04-29 13:25 GMT+03:00 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:13 PM
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:53 AM, Joe McDonald ideafil...@gmail.com wrote:
1) Do I need to specify this IP in both the
config file and the rootfs/etc/network/interfaces file?
Is there a better way to do this?
IMHO the best way is on container's interfaces file
2) why does one container
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Norberto Bensa
nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-04-21 11:01 GMT-03:00 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Norberto Bensa
nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-11 23:01 GMT-03:00 Norberto Bensa nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Björn Mittelsdorf
bjoern.mittelsd...@scheer-management.com wrote:
I am using lxc version 1.0.7
# Note that /etc/hostname is updated by lxc itself
for file in \
$LXC_ROOTFS_PATH/etc/sysconfig/network \
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Syraxes syra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
Have you tested using kvm WITHOUT network for the VMs, by any chance?
I tested something similar with virtualbox inside a container, and
virtualbox's
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Syraxes syra...@gmail.com wrote:
But is there another way to make the qemu work inside the
lxc container ?
Yes. I've done it many times. The host freezing suggests you
have a problem with the kvm binary - kvm runs fine outside of
a container? You're sure
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Mohan G mohan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
query: if i create a cgroup with memory limit of 4GB and if the system has
8GB ram, now if both the system wide pressure is pretty high, does it mean
it can take away part of this cgroup memory and what if the cgroup now
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Norberto Bensa
nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-03-25 2:53 GMT-03:00 Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Norberto Bensa
nbensa+lxcus...@gmail.com wrote
On the same container, of course.
--
Fajar
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 6:12 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
A symlink tu /run in the host ot in the same container?
Philip
On Monday, April 6, 2015, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Bostjan Skufca bost
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Johannes Graumann
johannes_graum...@web.de wrote:
Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Johannes Graumann (johannes_graum...@web.de):
Hello,
Has someone build lxc containers using the hosts /usr,/var, etc.
partitions mounted througha union file system to the container?
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 6:29 AM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Is systemd now supported as LXC guest's init system?
Short answer: not yet
It's work in progress. Among others, systemd in container needs lxcfs,
and one of the issues you'd find is
https://github.com/lxc/lxcfs/issues/17 ,
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Joshua Schaeffer
jschaeffer0...@gmail.com wrote:
Serge, I did have that sysctl, but it was set to 0. I changed it to 1 and
now I get a new error:
lxcuser@thinkhost:~$ lxc-create -t download -n c2
lxc: conf.c: lxc_map_ids: 3145 Missing newuidmap/newgidmap
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Georg Schönberger
gschoenber...@thomas-krenn.com wrote:
Hi!
I am trying to set up LXCFS under Ubuntu 14.04 trusty, I am using the
daily ppa:
# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ubuntu-lxc-daily-trusty.list
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-lxc/daily/ubuntu
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Chris Burroughs
chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/24/2015 06:00 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
create veth bridges inside a container on top of macvlan bridges?
It works just fine on Ubuntu with an old lxc-1.0.7.
Thanks for checking! This is with lxc
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Burroughs
chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote:
I have containers setup with macvlan [1] networking. This generally works
well, but it would be nice in a few edge cases to be able to create an
additional veth bridge from inside the container. However, this
for poweroff.target timed out.
Ubuntu 14.10
lxcfs 0.6-0ubuntu2~ubuntu14.10.1~ppa1
lxc 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~ubuntu14.10.1~ppa1
--
Fajar
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
I believe I have a reproducer script:
- create a ubuntu vivid container, c1, with systemd
# lxc-create -n
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:34 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it available automatically in Ubuntu lcx-daily?
Oddly enough it's available in lxd ppa, but lxc's daily master still
use version number 1.1.0.
$ apt-cache policy lxc
lxc:
Installed: 1.1.1-0ubuntu2~ubuntu14.10.1~ppa1
Candidate:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:17 PM, tom zs68j...@gmail.com wrote:
when create unprivileged LXC container as non root user, execute iptables
below failed.
iptables -A OUTPUT -o ethX -m owner --uid-owner ubuntu -j REJECT
It seems iptables with -m owner --uid-owner {USERNAME} only can be
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:53 PM, Geordie geo...@kos.net wrote:
/etc/lxc/default.conf
lxc.utsname =lsmb1
lxc.network.type=veth
lxc.network.flags=up
lxc.network.link=br0
lxc.network.hwaddr=ac:de:48:00:00:15
is the a unique MAC address?
If you're unsure, just leave it empty.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange
r...@campbell-lange.net wrote:
Dear LXC List
I'm looking for advice on running LXC on Debian.
I did quite a lot of work on trialling lxc about two years ago but then
left it there because of a lack of time and some troublesome issues with
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Fiedler Roman roman.fied...@ait.ac.at wrote:
But the current issue is different: The guest can snoop on the NFLOG messages
generated on host and destined for the host and hence can get knowledge of ANY
NFLOGed connection of host or any guest, no matter if on
lxc.cap.drop definition from
included configs (e.g. /usr/share/lxc/config/centos.common.conf)
If you know exactly which cap is needed (I'm guessing setfcap), you
should be able to copy that line and only remove that particular cap.
--
Fajar
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Marco foobar.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing issues while trying to share an host path or filesystem as
read only to guests (read only bind-mounts).
Host: Debian 8 Jessie
Linux deb 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt4-3 (2015-02-03) x86_64
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:48 AM, david.an...@bli.uzh.ch wrote:
Hi,
I am looking into individual user namespaces for each container.
The first container could have uids and gids from 10 to 165536.
The second container could have 20 to 265536, couldn't it?
How far can I go? Is there a
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Fiedler Roman roman.fied...@ait.ac.at wrote:
Hello list,
Has someone managed to get reliable network traffic auditing with LXC up and
running? That means, that it is possible to write a protocol of e.g. every
new connection from and to host.
On my setup
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Sorry, I didn¹t phrase this correctly.
What I meant is I ok to bypass the base container (don¹t need bridging
connectivity to it), but just want to expose the host bridge to the nested
container.
Short answer: no.
Why
, and then i will set soft limits on these children container. But when
i start nested containers, i don;t see any entrry under /sys/fs/groups for
the children container.
Regards
Mohan
From: Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
To: LXC users mailing-list lxc
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Rajasekar Darapuram
r...@robinsystems.com wrote:
The container created from scratch seems to work fine, but container whose
rootfs is mounted from a dir is not working
Here are my logs...Please let me know
Have you read the config
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote:
Here are the steps to reproduce (lxc 1.0.7), assuming container is already
running:
### Step 3: watch the shutdown messages in console on host:
...(all irrelevant content)...
AT LAST: Rebooting...
lxc_container:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Rajasekar Darapuram
r...@robinsystems.com wrote:
1. Should I explicitly bind the host /var/lib/lxcfs/cgroup/proc to the
container /proc (or something like /container_proc)
Not if you update lxc to 1.1. See
https://github.com/lxc/lxcfs/blob/master/README.md
--
/
Shows:
c11
c11-1
Before starting this container, there was no c11 or c11-1.
ThANKS
Anjali
On 3/4/15, 2:36 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:52 AM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net
wrote:
Thanks, that does not work either.
Is this broken?
Works
the cpuinfo, meminfo, uptime commands
on each container, they both are returning the same values and they match
the host machine values..
Did I miss anything?
From: Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
To: LXC users mailing-list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:00:00
I'm having intermittent problem with lxcfs, used by vivid (with
systemd-sysv installed) container. For example, just now lxc-start -n
-v and lxc-console -n v -t console stuck on
[ OK ] Reached target Basic System.
Starting System Logging Service...
lxc-stop -k -n v (from another
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Mohan G mohan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway we can have nested containers/cgroups. One parent container
forming the basis for children containers. i.e subset of parent container.
Yes.
On parent container config (in ubuntu), add this:
Hi,
Since systemd-219 is out, I decided to test it again for centos 7
container. It works cleaner than the previous attempt (218), no need
for custom hook script anymore.
Tested and works:
- container start stop (privileged container)
- lxc-console
- lxc-attach
- login via ssh
unprivileged
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Mohan G mohan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Folks.
can anyone point me to material/docs on running NFS /CIFS inside a
container.
Short version:
- if you mean nfs/cifs client, the recommended way if for the HOST to
mount it (e.g. directly on
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:51 PM, PONCET Anthony ff...@msn.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to used the memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes, and I have this error
when I trying to set this : lxc-cgroup -n c_name
memory.memsw.limit_in_bytes 2G
The name does say limit_in_bytes, not
:
It should work with 2G. The rest a bad excuse. It has become a standard in
the software industry.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:51 PM, PONCET Anthony ff...@msn.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to used
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com
wrote:
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
# c1's veth name on host side
auto v-c1-0
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Thanks, so for networking to work, all you need to do is add the
networking links to the config file in /var/lib/lxc/lxc_name and then
networking should work in the VM as it would in a normal LXC.
Not if by VM you mean
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:56 AM, Anjali Kulkarni anj...@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
The following link mentions booting an Ubuntu VM inside a container:
(https://www.stgraber.org/2012/03/04/booting-an-ubuntu-12-04-virtual-machine-in-an-lxc-container/)
However I had 2 qs
1. If we do boot a VM
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Dan Shi brui...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to run some command in container through lxc-attach. The script
is in python 2.7. Apparently, command like following does not raise a
subprocess exception:
subprocess.check_output('lxc-attach -n c1 -- ls
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Quoting Fajar A. Nugraha (l...@fajar.net):
# c1's veth name on host side
auto v-c1-0
iface v-c1-0 inet static
I'm probably just ignorant here, but - does this not cause 'ifup -a' to
fail when the containers
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
OK. So first of all, the steps that I posted above are NOT, in any
way, official or supported by lxc. However it works for me.
Upon further tests, it seems I missed something. Sorry for the mix up.
I actually tried two
OK. So first of all, the steps that I posted above are NOT, in any
way, official or supported by lxc. However it works for me.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:23 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
mount
/dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
The second scenario was with backported systemd, from f20 + ubuntu
That should be with config modifications, mount hook, AND backported
systemd ...
--
Fajar
___
lxc-users mailing
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Marco foobar.an...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've some questions for which I couldn't find good answers online and I'd
like your suggestions.
OS: Linux/Debian 8 Jessie
LXC: 1.0.6-6
Backing store: LVM
It seems that snapshot clones cannot be done online :
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 8:16 PM, jqf...@hotmail.com wrote:
jimmy@jimmyscomputer:~$ lxc-start -n p1 -F
lxc-start: start.c: print_top_failing_dir: 102 Permission denied - could
not access /home/jimmy. Please grant it 'x' access, or add an ACL for the
container root.
So I should just move
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:41 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I cannot make this solution work.
There are a lot of errors.
... which are ...?
a copy-paste of the output lxc-start -F -n will help, as well as
your final container config.
Also, I have cgroupfs-mount installed, so that I have
PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks.
I love Ubuntu as a host for LXC. I just got addicted to systemctl and
writing *.service files. It is much more sophisticated than the older way of
starting and stopping applications.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Dirk Geschke d...@lug-erding.de wrote:
ah, maybe I should try a newer systemd than jessie, jessie
is testing. But this is systemd 215-10, where unstable
uses systemd 215-11. So I did not expect a difference here.
But maybe I should try experimental, this is
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:06 AM, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote:
I run centos on my server
If I do
Lxc-create –name test –t cetos
It will install same centos as on my server
I understand I can use –r but how?
Let’s say I will install centos 5?
lxc-create ... -- -r 5
Note the --. Anything
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:19 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to use TYY=9 in a container, how do I achieve that?
You could probably start by NOT using big fonts in html mail when
posting to the list.
That being said, what do you mean tyy=9? did you mean tty? If yes,
try man
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 6:05 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
a) Sorry about the fonts
You're still replying using the same fonts. I find this really
annoying, so this will be my last response to you. Hopefully others
are willing to help.
b) All my containers are unconfined
c) My app does
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:25 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
In Ubuntu 14.04 fully updated and lxc latest.1.1, a container with Centos 7
never allows connection via lxc-console. It stays as below.
If you start the container with -F, you can see how it boots and indeed you
can log in via the
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:15 PM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response.
I disable selinux and a apparmor routinely. My containers are just a way to
separate applications, there are no users accessing them, nothing bad can
happen.
So basically you are saying that there is no way
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
If so, what's the best way to manually create a template in
unprivileged mode to ensure all the subuids and subgids are assigned
correctly.
Create
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
In summary, I would like each unprivileged container to run on top of a
new zfs filesystem which I create as root and assign relevant ownership
to. Is this possible?
should be possible, BUT not with lxc-create.
The easiest method
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
On 04/02/2015 10:10, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com
mailto:a...@gmx.com wrote:
In summary, I would like each unprivileged container to run on top
of a
new zfs
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Daniel Miranda danielk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I've recently seen the announcement of the 1.1 release, and I'd like to
test it out on my 14.04 systems, so I can validate it to use in production
(nothing life or money critical, just my college lab). I
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org wrote:
On 2015-02-02 21:13, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
You do know that lxc share the same kernel instance as the host OS,
making such settings not applicable?
Why not? Perhaps I wasn't very specific when starting the thread
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org wrote:
On 2015-02-02 21:37, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
It's certainly possible to do not applicable kinds of things with
processes and their page cache, i.e.:
https://code.google.com/p/pagecache-mangagement/ [1]
Or here
You do know that lxc share the same kernel instance as the host OS, making
such settings not applicable?
--
Fajar
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org wrote:
Is it possible to start a lxc container with writeback cache, in a way
similar to KVM's writeback cache?
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:50 PM, ScrumpyJack scrumpyj...@me.com wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, scrumpyjack scrumpyj...@me.com wrote:
Yes, i want to give a /32 to a container.
Relevant part of container's /etc/network/interfaces
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:31 PM, ScrumpyJack scrumpyj...@me.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, ScrumpyJack wrote:
I'd like to connect a physical interface from a host to a LXC container
guest like so:
lxc.network.type=phys
And then assign a routable IP/32 address to the LXC container
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:09 PM, scrumpyjack scrumpyj...@me.com wrote:
Yes, i want to give a /32 to a container.
If i stick to
lxc.network.type = macvlan
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = eth0
lxc.network.name = eth1
lxc.network.ipv4 = 21.45.463.23/32 (fake IP, obvs)
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Alex Mestiashvili
a...@biotec.tu-dresden.de wrote:
Hi All,
trying to start the xorg server in the container I receive the following
messages:
[ 61645.425] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 340.65 Tue Dec 2 08:47:36 PST
2014
What are you trying to achieve?
You need to be more clear. More response inline
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mohan G mohan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply, now i guess my specific question is.
1) I have my own file system which i can load to the kernel. But i want to
restrict the file systems usage as a
, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net
wrote:
You need to be more clear. More response inline
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Mohan G mohan...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply, now i guess my specific question is.
1) I have my own file system which i can load to the kernel. But i want
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Raimund Berger raimund.ber...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm asking since, as root, I'm guessing it might be easier to map select
devices - like OSS audio - into a container, even when mapping uids too,
which seems to be pretty much impossible to do with unprivileged
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Michael R. Hines
mrhi...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am using LXC 1.0.5, and I have container running Redhat 7.0 on a Power7
processor. My host kernel version is 3.10.42.
The cgroup for this container located at /cgroup/cpu works very well - I
can
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Moritz Kobel mailingli...@kobelnet.ch
wrote:
Hello,
I would like to configure several IPv4 and IPv6 adresses for one
container. This works basically with the configuration below.
But it configures only one network interface (eth0) with all addresses.
(One
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 9:27 AM, CDR vene...@gmail.com wrote:
That is how we do business now, over TCP. By the way, I downloaded a new
derivative of Mysql, http://paralleluniverse-inc.com/, and it seems, in my
tests, several times faster than any other version, at least for this query
For critical line-of-business normally you wouldn't use git snapshot.
Unless you're a developer (which you already mentioned you're not).
I'd sugest you either:
- use whatever released version already packaged, or
- learn how to fix it manually, or hire someone to do so (which should
be very
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Marcel Sánchez Toledano
marcelsanch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm need to make some kind of comparison between the resources (CPU,
RAM,...) used when executing 1 LxC container and the resources used when
executing 1 SIMCTL (VNUML utility, UML) Virtual Machine.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
The official networking guide for lxc on Ubuntu :
https://help.ubuntu.com/14.04/serverguide/lxc.html#lxc-network
At first glance your config looks correct, but the most obvious
possible source of problem would be -i eth0. You said
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Adam Gold a...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello. I'm just starting to learn about containers so apologies for the
basic question (I couldn't find an exact answer from my non-exhaustive
review of the archives).
I'm trying to create a private container network using
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:05 PM, othiman othi...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi everyone,
I already posted this to askubuntu.com (http://askubuntu.com/
questions/522457/lxc-container-no-outgoing-traffic-
with-bridged-network-and-public-ip-address), but I think this might be a
better place to find help.
Depends on how your provider set it up.
If it WERE intended to work that way, they would've given you full
instructions (e.g. use this IP, this netmask, and this gateway) instead
of just giving the IP (and probably say add this as a secondary IP on your
server).
The fact that you say it works
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','m...@wittsend.com'); wrote：
On Sat, 2014-08-30 at 21:32 +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Saturday, August 30, 2014, Sun Keqin ke...@nfs.iscas.ac.cn
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ke...@nfs.iscas.ac.cn'); wrote:
Hi all,
How to run a GUI program (eg
401 - 500 of 556 matches
Mail list logo
