[lxc-users] ArchLinux container network problems with systemd 244 (systemd 243 works ok)

Hello, Just reporting this problem I'm experiencing with Arch Linux on LXD. Create container using "images:archlinux/current/amd64" and with a network interface connected to a bridge. Configure /etc/systemd/network/mynetif.network to configure by DHCP: [Match] Name=mynetif [Network] DHCP=ipv4

Re: [lxc-users] Converting network from LXC to LXD

On 21/12/2019 16:51, John Lane wrote: > > I can't do this: > > $ lxc config device set mycontainer eth0 ipv4.address 192.168.21.2/24 >Error: Invalid devices: > Invalid value for device option ipv4.address: Not an IPv4 address:

Re: [lxc-users] Converting network from LXC to LXD

On 20/12/2019 14:10, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/docs/master/containers#type-nic > > So something like this for veth on a bridge (on "lxc config edit > CONTAINER_NAME", in case you haven't figure it out): > > devices: > eth0: > name: eth0 > host_name:

Re: [lxc-users] Converting network from LXC to LXD

On 20/12/2019 14:10, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > You're looking in the wrong section > > https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/docs/master/containers#type-nic > Thank you, don't know how I missed that :) I have the first one working nicely with 3 interfaces, deployed using terraform-provider-lxd.

[lxc-users] Converting network from LXC to LXD

-lxd-2-3/ I'd appreciate some pointers towards the appropriate documentation or an explanation of how to do this with lxd. Much appreciated, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] sharing files and unprivileged LXC container

I use setfacl/getfacl to change permissions on host files so they are accessible to container's users. I am doing only basic stuff with very few users so not sure how that approach scales. Of course anything you do open up what the container can do will reduce the security of using containers.

Re: [lxc-users] What is the state of the art for lxd and wifi ?

On 07/23/2018 06:47 AM, Pierre Couderc wrote: On 07/23/2018 12:37 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Pierre Couderc > wrote: On 07/23/2018 12:12 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: Relevant to all VM-like in general (including lxd, kvm

Re: [lxc-users] forcing a container to use a specific cgroup with v2.0.8

. I have asked about this latter issue on the lxc forum at https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/why-cgroups-are-setup-as-they-are/1313/2 John On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 22:58 +, Marshall2, John (SSC/SPC) wrote: Hi, At the moment I am using LXC 2.0.8 (ubuntu 16.04) and have noticed a change

Re: [lxc-users] forcing a container to use a specific cgroup with v2.0.8

force lxc-start to just inherit and not touch anything else? Thanks, John On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 22:58 +, Marshall2, John (SSC/SPC) wrote: Hi, At the moment I am using LXC 2.0.8 (ubuntu 16.04) and have noticed a change in behavior since previous releases of LXC I have used (1.x and 2.0.5,

[lxc-users] forcing a container to use a specific cgroup with v2.0.8

this with 2.0.8, at least for now. Thanks, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] How to enable SElinux for LXC ?

Per the conf man page, have you confirmed that the host has selinux enabled and that lxc was compiled with selinux support? John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Unable to use mknod

either use lxc.cap.drop or lxc.cap.keep, not both. John On 11/25/2017 04:37 PM, Pavol Cupka wrote: and here http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/lxc.container.conf.5.html On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Pavol Cupka <pavol.cu...@gmail.com> wrote: CAP_MKNOD http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man

[lxc-users] Unable to use mknod

Hello, I have done enough Web searching in how to get access to usb cdrom drive from an unprivileged container that I would like to think I have a unique problem :) I am using Debian Stretch and lxc 2.0.7.  My container config is below. In container: container:/# mknod -m 666 /tmp/cdrom b

[lxc-users] [Feature requests] lxc launch --description "This container runs HTTPd frontend"

Hello, I do not know if this is the correct place to ask this but it would be great to be able to attach a description to containers created with LXD (lxc launch). This description could be printed out afterwards while listing container characteristics: This could be invoked with a

[lxc-users] suddenly I cannot start lxcs due to cgroup error

I have been running lxcs for over a year without issues on an Odroid-C2 running Arch ARM (aarch64).  Recently, I am unable to start any of the containers due to some errors around cgroups.  This happened today after an update where 4 packages got updated but note that downgrading them back to

[lxc-users] LXD enters failed state when auto_update is on

I was having an issue with lxd using an image from the latest daily build of artful 17.10 in that lxd entered failed state when starting. If images auto_update was set to 1, lxd would enter failed state when the trying to download from https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/daily. The issue ocurred

[lxc-users] Using lxc-copy snapshots with overlayfs

I have a linux container "base" that I snapshot using /usr/bin/lxc-copy for various containers using overlayfs like so: lxc-copy -n base -N snapshot1 -M -s -B overlayfs Can I start the "base" container while the snapshots are running?  My goal is to update packages in the base image without

Re: [lxc-users] Am I misusing LXCs?

It is traditional LXC because LXD wasn't out when I set it up originally. I won't build the packages for LXD if I am not even using it properly. I direct incoming connections using iptables with both the the host and the virtual router. I am extremely confident about moving my installation. I

[lxc-users] Am I misusing LXCs?

I build an LXC network on my VPS to separate all of my personal service from each other how similar they are to each other while not having to buy more VPS that I don't utilize intensely. Both my containers and my host are running Debian 8. I made a container for Email communications (Email and

Re: [lxc-users] Can unprivileged containers start from a loop device?

. Having to maintain premount scripts is inconvenient compared to having LXC do it. I can't use LXD yet because my whole environment is Debian 8. On 02/08/2017 08:42 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 7:57 PM, John Lewis <oflam...@gmail.com <mailto:oflam...@gmail.com&g

[lxc-users] Can unprivileged containers start from a loop device?

Can unprivileged containers start from a loop device? ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Risk/benefit of enabling user namespaces in the kernel for running unprivileged containers

Thanks guys, for providing the context around this. ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Risk/benefit of enabling user namespaces in the kernel for running unprivileged containers

- Original Message - > From: Serge E. Hallyn > To: LXC users mailing-list > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 11:20 AM > Subject: Re: [lxc-users] Risk/benefit of enabling user namespaces in the > kernel for running unprivileged

[lxc-users] Risk/benefit of enabling user namespaces in the kernel for running unprivileged containers

From S. Graber's blog[1] and other sources, consensus is that unprivileged containers offer the best security from the container's perspective. There is quite a discussion in an Arch Linux feature request[2] around the risks of enabling user namespaces in the distro default kernel as it

Re: [lxc-users] Numerous errors running unprivileged container on Arch Linux x86_64

> From: Fajar A. Nugraha >To: LXC users mailing-list >Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 7:38 PM >Subject: Re: [lxc-users] Numerous errors running unprivileged container on >Arch Linux x86_64 > > >It's a known

Re: [lxc-users] Numerous errors running unprivileged container on Arch Linux x86_64

> > From: Fajar A. Nugraha >To: LXC users mailing-list >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:23 PM >Subject: Re: [lxc-users] Numerous errors running unprivileged container on >Arch Linux x86_64 > >Short

[lxc-users] Numerous errors running unprivileged container on Arch Linux x86_64

I setup /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid and modified /etc/lxc/default.conf to add the needed uid/gids: % grep root /etc/sub* /etc/subgid:root:10:65536 /etc/subuid:root:10:65536 % cat /etc/lxc/default.conf lxc.network.type = empty lxc.id_map = u 0 10 65536 lxc.id_map = g 0 10 65536

[lxc-users] Error starting systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service in unprivileged container

When I start my unprivileged container, systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service fails to start with the following errors per journalctl: Jan 09 14:16:20 playtime systemd[1]: systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service: Failed to reset devices.list: Operation not permitted Jan 09 14:16:20 playtime systemd[1]:

[lxc-users] Running an unprivileged container through systemd as root rather than as a user

I would like to call the systemd unit lxc@.service to run an unprivileged container that I created as the root user rather than as a system user. Does doing so present any security concerns? For reference, I created the container like this: 1) Added the following to /etc/lxc/default.conf

Re: [lxc-users] question about lxc-copy snapshots

>To: "lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org" > >Sent: Sunday, January 8, 2017 7:36 PM >Subject: question about lxc-copy snapshots > > > >I have a base image that I snapshot for my container. My question is: can I >start the base image while the snapshots are

[lxc-users] question about lxc-copy snapshots

I have a base image that I snapshot for my container.  My question is: can I start the base image while the snapshots are running?  My goal is to update the packages in the base image without disturbing the overlayfs clones.___ lxc-users mailing list

Re: [lxc-users] OpenVPN server in a container... can connect but no webpages load

ner? (without all the vpn thing?) 2016-12-29 3:39 GMT+01:00 Idafe Houghton <idafe.hough...@gmail.com>: What I may say, may seem stupid, but just to make sure... May you tell us your NATting tables? Thanks. 2016-12-27 21:13 GMT+01:00 John <da_audioph...@yahoo.com>: Goal: I current

[lxc-users] OpenVPN server in a container... can connect but no webpages load

Goal: I currently have standalone box running openvpn that is correctly configured and works. My goal is to move that to a container. Problem: I can connect to the openvpn server in the container but I cannot load webpages, they just timeout. I must not have something configured correctly. I

Re: [lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

Raised issue https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/1363 ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

On 21/12/16 16:13, Pavol Cupka wrote: > edit the line > lxc.tty = 1 #allow this many ttys > and remove the comment > so it will look like this > lxc.tty = 1 > > enjoy :) > Ok, yes that resolves the problem but I also had to remove the comment from the "lxc.pts"

Re: [lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

On 21/12/16 14:45, Pavol Cupka wrote: > so the containers restarted after upgrade to 2.0.6 > > do you mind pasting your config? > Sure, here is a config file. It is one of many. None work under 2.0.6 but all work under 2.0.4. I haven't modified these configs in a couple of years because, until

Re: [lxc-users] How to apply commands in howtos - macvlan and disk passthrough

in another, is this setup stable enough if I set it up as described above? this is my lxc config, is there anything I should change? disktest: path: /testdisk source: /home/me/testdisk type: disk kind regards, John Am 21.12.2016 um 15:04 schrieb Pavol Cupka: some of your questions

Re: [lxc-users] How to apply commands in howtos - macvlan and disk passthrough

appreciate any help. with kind regards, John P.S.: I answered to the mailing list, is this the right way to do it, or should I answer to you directly? Am 20.12.2016 um 22:52 schrieb Tycho Andersen: Hi John, On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:39:07PM +0100, john.gub...@web.de wrote: Hello,

Re: [lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

On 21/12/16 10:37, Pavol Cupka wrote: > any strange invisible characters on that line > try to make a minimal config by typing everything by hand nothing strange - configs were hand-typed originally. They've been in place for a couple of years at least without any problems. They still work if I

Re: [lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

On 21/12/16 10:24, Pavol Cupka wrote: > what happens when you comment out that line? It makes no difference. That was the first thing I tried :) ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org

[lxc-users] How to apply commands in howtos - macvlan and disk passthrough

nd regards, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] Containers don't start with LXC 2.0.6 on Arch Linux

After a recent update to my Arch system, no containers will start. Instead I get this: lxc-start: parse.c: lxc_file_for_each_line: 57 Failed to parse config: lxc.tty = 1 lxc-start: tools/lxc_start.c: main: 253 Failed to create lxc_container It happens with all containers. Downgrading

Re: [lxc-users] Can not stop lxc with lxc-stop

The same as lxc-stop -n testlxc Thank you for your help. John 2016-09-27 14:21 GMT+08:00 Marat Khalili <m...@rqc.ru>: > What's with: > > # lxc-stop -n testlxc -k > > ? > -- > > With Best Regards, > Marat Khalili > > On 27/09/16 05:46, John Y. wrote:

[lxc-users] Can not stop lxc with lxc-stop

- failed to open '/proc/23193/ns/mnt' lxc-attach: attach.c: lxc_attach: 948 failed to enter the namespace And lxc-stop still hanged without any output. Anyone know why? Thanks, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http

[lxc-users] lxc-ls show containers which does not exist with lxc 1.0.6

/yaowj/lxc.xml -d 1. Why there are some lxc still in lxc-ls when I use `lxc-stop -n test2 -k` (or use `kill -9 pid`) to stop it? 2. How to remove these unused lxc info? Thanks, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http

Re: [lxc-users] [SOLVED] Will I need pre-mount hooks if redesign my lxc file systems?

On 07/08/2016 10:46 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting John Lewis (oflam...@gmail.com): >> I have a filesystem like this inside of a filesystem image >> >>/ >> >> lost+found >> >> rootfs/[Linux root

[lxc-users] Will I need pre-mount hooks if redesign my lxc file systems?

I have a filesystem like this inside of a filesystem image / lost+found rootfs/[Linux root file system directories] If I change it to the following, will I have to use premount hooks? / [Linux root file system directories]

Re: [lxc-users] Network space visibility in containers

Oh, those are the tap interfaces. LXC doesn't hide that from the host. I am not sure if it should. On 07/06/2016 01:36 PM, st...@linuxsuite.org wrote: >> Try defining lxc.network.name and see if it fixes it. >> > version 1.08 > >Nope. > > [root@admn-101 ~]#

Re: [lxc-users] Network space visibility in containers

Try defining lxc.network.name and see if it fixes it. On 07/06/2016 12:04 PM, st...@linuxsuite.org wrote: >> How are these containers networked together? Are you using a Bridges on >> the host or are you just bringing up new interfaces on the host? > I have a bridge for each interface.

Re: [lxc-users] Network space visibility in containers

How are these containers networked together? Are you using a Bridges on the host or are you just bringing up new interfaces on the host? On 07/06/2016 10:24 AM, st...@linuxsuite.org wrote: > Howdy! > > I have a number of containers running. Is it expected that > information about

Re: [lxc-users] How do you mount this file as an lxc rootfs?

On 06/25/2016 06:38 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 03:20:08PM -0400, John Lewis wrote: >> On 06/20/2016 11:51 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> The pre-mount hook runs in the container's mount namespace but before >>> mounting the rootfs. So the

Re: [lxc-users] How do you mount this file as an lxc rootfs?

On 06/20/2016 11:51 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > The pre-mount hook runs in the container's mount namespace but before > mounting the rootfs. So the fs you mount only shows up in the container's > namespace, not on the host. Auto-cleanup is just a nice bonus. I would > have been not entirely

Re: [lxc-users] [SOLVED] How do you mount this file as an lxc rootfs?

On 06/20/2016 10:16 AM, John Lewis wrote: > On 06/20/2016 10:04 AM, Mike Wright wrote: >> On 06/20/2016 06:47 AM, John Lewis wrote: >>> I have a ext4 formatted file called pmd.simg with a directory structure >>> like this. >>> >>> lost+found rootfs >

Re: [lxc-users] How do you mount this file as an lxc rootfs?

On 06/20/2016 10:04 AM, Mike Wright wrote: > On 06/20/2016 06:47 AM, John Lewis wrote: >> I have a ext4 formatted file called pmd.simg with a directory structure >> like this. >> >> lost+found rootfs > > You should be able to mount that via the loop devic

[lxc-users] How do you mount this file as an lxc rootfs?

I have a ext4 formatted file called pmd.simg with a directory structure like this. lost+found rootfs How do I mount it and pivot to it properly so I can start the lxc? The rootfs directory has a debian chroot filesystem on it. ___ lxc-users mailing

[lxc-users] Is there anything in LXC that would prevent DHCPv6 from working?

I am use wide-dhcpv6-server and wide-dhcpv6-client in two diffrent LXCs with an iproute2 created bridge and lxc created tun/tap devices and I am using 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP and my kernel. I don't have any firewall that would block ipv6 request and responses that would occur on port 546 and 547,

Re: [lxc-users] Better error logging when starting containers?

(config error? actual bug?) with those error messages. John > On Feb 22, 2016, at 14:11, Akshay Karle <akshay.a.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree with your comments and the fact that the team is busy working lxc v2, > but I wanted to get a sense of whether it was a problem

Re: [lxc-users] Are these messages normal for un-previlieged lxc containers?

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:55, Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > Quoting John Siu (john.sd@gmail.com): >> OS: Ubuntu 16.04 >> LXC: 2.0.0-rc1 >> >> Following are from host journal when starting up a lxc container: >

Re: [lxc-users] Are these messages normal for un-previlieged lxc containers?

lice/session-2.scope/lxc/lxc1/system.slice/systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service, ignoring: Invalid argument Feb 22 01:31:21 lxc1 systemd[1]: Started Update UTMP about System Runlevel Changes. Feb 22 01:31:21 lxc1 systemd[1]: Startup finished in 3.365s. > On Feb 22, 2016, at 0

[lxc-users] LXD Live Migration: error - must have criu 1.9 or greater

webpage (https://criu.org/Main_Page), the latest version appears to be version 1.8. However, the error suggests a more recent version 1.9 to be required. Would you know where I can find version 1.9 of criu? Or is the failure caused by something else? Thank you, John

Re: [lxc-users] [Help]LXD:point of differentiation. please answer my question

> On Feb 20, 2016, at 02:39, 디케이 wrote: > > Hi^^ > > Recently, I first know about LXD and I have searched information with great > interest. > > (from articles, linuxcontainers.org , ubuntu > product page) > > But, until now, There are some

Re: [lxc-users] Better error logging when starting containers?

” (lower-case L) set the log level to 9. That should give you more information. Without it the log level is default to 0 or 1, which is the same as what you see on screen (stderr). John Siu > On Feb 21, 2016, at 18:50, Akshay Karle <akshay.a.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: [lxc-users] LXD Live Migration: error - must have criu 1.9 or greater

@canonical.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 6:38 AM To: LXC users mailing-list Subject: Re: [lxc-users] LXD Live Migration: error - must have criu 1.9 or greater On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:14:25AM +0100, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: > Hi, > > On 11.02.2016 19:33, John Dupont wrote: >

[lxc-users] LXC console not working with new Kali linux container, nothing being logged

I made an LXC by unpacking the squashfs image on the installation DVD of Kali Linux. It starts but, if I start it as a daemon I can't use LXC console to log into it. If I start it interactively I can log into it. The problem is that there is no logging even when I configure the log level to be

Re: [lxc-users] LXC console not working with new Kali linux container, nothing being logged

I forgot to append the config file. On 02/07/2016 07:37 AM, John Lewis wrote: > I made an LXC by unpacking the squashfs image on the installation DVD of > Kali Linux. It starts but, if I start it as a daemon I can't use LXC > console to log into it. If I start it interactively

[lxc-users] Could not find writable mount point for cgroup hierarchy 8 while trying to create cgroup

root@thunderguard:/home/diskimg/lxc# lxc-start -n rosxubuntu lxc-start: Could not find writable mount point for cgroup hierarchy 8 while trying to create cgroup. lxc-start: failed creating cgroups lxc-start: failed to spawn 'rosxubuntu' lxc-start: The container failed to start. lxc-start:

Re: [lxc-users] What is right way to backup and restore linux containers?

What I do is store my containers in a disk image with a filesystem, usually ext4. I store the image in the LXC server's /opt. I mount the LXC's to /srv before starting them because I haven't figured out how to run them directly out of the disk images yet. I back up the disk images with rsnapshot

Re: [lxc-users] re I can't create tun device in Systemd Linux container {john lewis} SOLVED

On 11/29/2015 05:51 PM, brian mullan wrote: > Check the syntax of tuntap creation and make sure you > have the command right... > > http://baturin.org/docs/iproute2/#Add%20an%20tun/tap%20device%20useable%20by%20root > > brian > Someone on gave me a link to the Arch wiki that had the fix.

[lxc-users] Naming under /sys/fs/cgroup in LXC container

than entries for all the controllers? In effect could the directory hugetlb,perf_event,blkio,freezer,devices,memory,cpuacct,cpu,cpuset be given a name unified instead? Thanks, John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http

Re: [lxc-users] Networking LXC and VirtualBox on the same host

On 20/09/14 14:21, J Bc wrote: route -n Not sure what you mean, everything's on the same subnet. Also, if it were routing then pings wouldn't work either... My route -n is this Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.138

[lxc-users] Networking LXC and VirtualBox on the same host

I have a test rig with LXC and VirtualBox guests on it. Host is ArchLinux 64-bit. All virtual machines and containers use the same bridged network config. I've noticed that * the containers can talk to each other, the host and anything else on the network * the VB guests can talk to each

Re: [lxc-users] Substitute for lxc-ps?

on the commit that removed lxc-ps https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/7f12cae956c003445e6ee182b414617b52532af6 John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Substitute for lxc-ps?

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:52 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Michael Chinn michael.ch...@simpleprecision.com wrote: I see that lxc-ps was removed for v 1.x: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.containers.lxc.general/7623 Q: Why

Re: [lxc-users] lxc-ps not found

with the 1.x release. John ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] [Lxc-users] LXC and sound in container -

On 25/12/13 15:33, TuxRaiderPen wrote: On Friday, November 15, 2013 04:50:58 John wrote: On 09/11/13 15:12, brian mullan wrote: I've searched the web for 2 weeks now and can find no documentation describing steps to configure sound in an LXC container. Here is what I do. It's just ALSA

Re: [lxc-users] iptabes kernel modules not loading in containers

for brute force attacks by using iptables. It's useful and sets iptables rules. Alternately setup a firewall on the host or load the iptables modules in /etc/modules at boot on the host. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Gandhi, Ibha (HP Software) ib...@hp.comwrote: Hi John, Even I am facing

Re: [lxc-users] iptabes kernel modules not loading in containers

Yes, that was it thanks. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Stéphane Graber stgra...@ubuntu.comwrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:00:32PM -0500, John Baker wrote: Hi, I'm using lxc in 12.04.4 LTS and seem to have a chronic issue with the iptables modfule not loading inside a container. I