Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-03-28 Thread Steven Spencer
All, Regarding the availability of snapd for CentOS 7 (or Red Hat Enterprise), you need only enable the epel repository prior to attempting to install snapd: yum install epel-release Then install snapd: yum update yum install snapd That's it. Thanks, Steven G. Spencer On Sun, Mar 24, 2019

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-03-24 Thread lducos
Hello have you read this documentation ? https://docs.snapcraft.io/installing-snap-on-centos/10020 26 février 2019 09:28 "Harald Dunkel" a écrit: > On 2/25/19 11:20 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> snapd + LXD work fine on CentOS 7, it's even in our CI environment, so >> presumably the same

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-26 Thread Richard Hector
On 25/02/19 4:52 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:46 PM Richard Hector > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I see that lxd in ubuntu cosmic and disco is a transitional package for > snap - I see that lxd can be used for snap packages, but

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-26 Thread Harald Dunkel
On 2/25/19 11:20 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: > snapd + LXD work fine on CentOS 7, it's even in our CI environment, so > presumably the same steps should work on RHEL 7. > Apparently it doesn't work that fine: [root@centos7 ~]# yum install snapd Loaded plugins: fastestmirror,

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-25 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:20 PM Stéphane Graber wrote: > snapd + LXD work fine on CentOS 7, it's even in our CI environment, so > presumably the same steps should work on RHEL 7. > > Awesome ! > In the past I've built private RPMs for lxd on centos. It became a hassle > though as (for example)

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-25 Thread Stéphane Graber
snapd + LXD work fine on CentOS 7, it's even in our CI environment, so presumably the same steps should work on RHEL 7. On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:54 AM Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:15 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: >> >> On 2/25/19 4:52 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> > >> >

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-25 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:15 PM Harald Dunkel wrote: > On 2/25/19 4:52 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > > > snapcraft.io is also owned by Canonical. > > > > By using lxd snap, they can easly have lxd running on any distro that > already support snaps, without having to

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-25 Thread Harald Dunkel
On 2/25/19 4:52 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: snapcraft.io  is also owned by Canonical. By using lxd snap, they can easly have lxd running on any distro that already support snaps, without having to maintain separate packages. The problem is that there is no standard

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-24 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:46 PM Richard Hector wrote: > Hi all, > > I see that lxd in ubuntu cosmic and disco is a transitional package for > snap - I see that lxd can be used for snap packages, but they're not the > same thing, right? > >

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-23 Thread Richard Hector
On 24/02/19 7:18 AM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Richard Hector! > >> Yep, sure. But LXD is currently the most common way to manage LXC, >> right? > > Right? Right?! Riiight???!! > > Sorry, but your insistence is not going to change the facts. Steady on. I wasn't insisting on

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-23 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Richard Hector! > Yep, sure. But LXD is currently the most common way to manage LXC, > right? Right? Right?! Riiight???!! Sorry, but your insistence is not going to change the facts. > At least, when I ask LXC questions on here, people seem to be > surprised that I'm not using

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-23 Thread Richard Hector
On 24/02/19 5:17 AM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Richard Hector! > >> Hi all, > >> I see that lxd in ubuntu cosmic and disco is a transitional package for >> snap - I see that lxd can be used for snap packages, but they're not the >> same thing, right? > >> And Debian buster (even sid)

Re: [lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-23 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Richard Hector! > Hi all, > I see that lxd in ubuntu cosmic and disco is a transitional package for > snap - I see that lxd can be used for snap packages, but they're not the > same thing, right? > And Debian buster (even sid) still doesn't have lxd at all. > Is lxd not the future

[lxc-users] future of lxc/lxd? snap?

2019-02-23 Thread Richard Hector
Hi all, I see that lxd in ubuntu cosmic and disco is a transitional package for snap - I see that lxd can be used for snap packages, but they're not the same thing, right? And Debian buster (even sid) still doesn't have lxd at all. Is lxd not the future of lxc after all? At least in