On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 06:16:05AM +, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> On Thursday, June 29, 2017 13:30 JST, Stéphane Graber
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, so that just proves that we really more systematic testing of the
> > way we handle all that mess in "lxc file push".
> >
> >
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 13:30 JST, Stéphane Graber
wrote:
> Hmm, so that just proves that we really more systematic testing of the
> way we handle all that mess in "lxc file push".
>
> For this particular case, my feeling is that LXD 2.5's behavior is
> correct.
OK,