On 12/12/2011 04:48 AM, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
When there are only one bridge on the system or the bridges are not
connected together, this option is pointless and we can set the delay to
'0'. That makes the port to be enabled instantaneously, hence the
container can access the network
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:54 +0530, nishant mungse wrote:
Hi Geordy,
Hi Nishant,
I removed Cc: to containers@ as your troubles are about using the lxc
userspace tool: lxc-users@ is THE place for seeking help.
This script gives the IP address of running system, but what I want is
to get the
Hi folks.
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual hosts
for a web server.
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is, what the
best, most elegant and fail proof technique for that?
At this moment I'm thinking of a master container
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, István Király - LaKing wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual
hosts for a web server.
As next step I would like to minimize container size. My question is,
what the best, most elegant and fail proof technique for
On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Arie Skliarouk wrote:
When I tried to restart the vserver, it did not came up. Long story short,
I found that lxc-destroy did not destroy the cgroup of the same name as the
server. The cgroup remains visible in the /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/master
directory. The tasks file is
/I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like
virtual hosts for a web server./
It is possible to use shared, read-only mounts between the host and
containers. However, you will need to carefully consider your security
requirements and maintenance procedures.
If
Hi,
I'm new in lxc and I have some doubts about it.
Is lxc platform dependent?
Could I use lxc in the MPC837x processor?
The support to checkpoint/resume commands will be work in this platform?
I'm need to build a High Availability system with MPC837x processor and
I'm planning to use the lxc
2011/12/13 Zhu Yanhai zhu.yan...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2011/12/13 Derek Simkowiak de...@simkowiak.net:
I'm trying to compose a system, where lxc containers behave like virtual
hosts for a web server.
It is possible to use shared, read-only mounts between the host and
containers. However, you
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 08:43 +0100, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Sun 2011-12-11 (19:48), Derek Simkowiak wrote:
The problem is not related to the setfd option. It is caused by
the bridge acquired a new MAC address. Libvirt already has a fix for
this, and there is a patch in the works
