On 06/03/2013 06:55 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
I have (with Rob van der Hoeven's help) setup a Debian Wheezy container on a
Wheezy host. This worked well.
I can ssh into the main host from the lxc host. However I cannot hit the
internet from the lxc host. I'd be grateful for some
On 06/04/2013 12:52 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
Hi Tamas
Thanks very much for your email. First of all thanks very much for the
note about the lxc.network.ipv4 paramenter -- I disabled that and
routing seems to be fine.
My question was unclear -- sorry! My host is on the internet. I can
On 06/02/2013 06:06 AM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
No actually kernel panics happen in more than one host.
Please keep the mailing list in the address list and don't use toppost.
What version do you use?
tamas
--
Get
On 06/02/2013 01:32 PM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
lxc 0.8.0
Please don not use toppost!
Is there any speacial, when it goes to panic? Any details?
I would try with higher and lower version of LXC and update kernel, if there is
any.
Though, I've never used LXC on CentOS, I've never heard things
On 06/01/2013 09:43 PM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
Hi All
We run a bunch of lxc containers over a centos 6.2 host. The containers use
veth pairs and connect
to the network through a linux bridge(br0) at the host. The setup was fine.
But suddenly the host
machine started crashing frequently
On 04/15/2013 12:17 PM, David Parks wrote:
Could this be an LXC specific issue? I’m trying to run an NFS server within a
container.
davidparks21@hadoop-fsimage-bkup1:~$ sudo service nfs-kernel-server restart
* Stopping NFS kernel daemon
...done.
* Unexporting directories for NFS
On 04/15/2013 12:34 PM, David Parks wrote:
It's really a no-go on LXC huh? That's too bad. Glusterfs seems like
overkill, I just want a remote mount for a small, but critical, backup
process. But it must be mounted, I'd rather not clutter up the host OS, as
the whole point of LXC was to keep
On 04/08/2013 03:05 AM, István Király wrote:
Hi folks.
I installed a fresh Fedora 18. Updated, kernel is at 3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64
Downloaded lxc 0.9.0, and compiled it.
[root@g7 ~]# lxc-checkconfig
Kernel configuration not found at /proc/config.gz; searching...
Kernel configuration found
On 04/04/2013 03:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
If you want to go ahead and send a full patch against the current
lxc-clone.in script, that should help me reproduce what you want in
the api version.
I have limited scripting skills, but I do my best.
Will the path used as rootfs always be a zfs
On 04/03/2013 11:18 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
I'm working right now on clone in the c api. The basics were simple
enough, now to tackle the blockdev copy/snapshotting...
Is zfs on the support list?:)
Or just existing backingtores, like btrfs, lvm..etc?
10x
tamas
On 03/07/2013 04:54 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
hi All,
At the end of this script it wants to remove the fs in some cases.
But something is wrong about it, as if it's other they are ignored.
Sorry I don't understand - what is being ignored in which
On 03/07/2013 09:43 PM, zoolook wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
else
# In case rootfs is not under $lxc_path/$lxc_name, remove it
rm -rf --one-file-system --preserve-root $rootdev
But it's removed here
On 03/04/2013 07:44 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
How does python api works what does it look for?
Or maybe there is an issue only in lxc-ls:
If I see correctly, it checks if /var/lib/lxc/$container/config file exists.
I tried without the lxcpath setting as well.
Than I see, it want's to connect
hi All,
At the end of this script it wants to remove the fs in some cases.
But something is wrong about it, as if it's other they are ignored.
# Deduce the type of rootfs
# If LVM partition, destroy it. For btrfs, we delete the subvolue. If anything
# else, ignore it. We'll support deletion of
On 03/05/2013 05:27 AM, Scott Moser wrote:
I wrote the btrfs clone stuff, I just cloned the rootfs directory as it
was the only thing I thought would be of any significant size. The other
things I think just get copied).
Its probably me thats missing something obvious, but whats the benefit
On 03/04/2013 03:34 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
The change proposed above wouldn't work for cases where you create the
container config in /var/lib/lxc/container but don't store the rootfs
there. For example when using lvm-backed containers.
In such case, a second call to lxc-create would
hi,
How does python api works what does it look for?
Or maybe there is an issue only in lxc-ls:
If I see correctly, it checks if /var/lib/lxc/$container/config file exists.
I tried without the lxcpath setting as well.
Than I see, it want's to connect to /var/lib/lxc/$container/command file and
On 03/04/2013 04:45 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
hi All,
I'm about adding zfs support to lxc-create like lvm and btrfs has.
elif [ $backingstore = btrfs ]; then
mkdir $lxc_path/$lxc_name
if ! out=$(btrfs subvolume create $rootfs 21
On 03/01/2013 07:47 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
No kernel until 3.8 (and slightly higher actually) will really support
user namespaces.
In any case, the lxc version in 12.04 doesn't know how to use the user
namespaces even if they were there. So that output from lxc-checkconfig
is safe to
hi All,
I'm about adding zfs support to lxc-create like lvm and btrfs has.
elif [ $backingstore = btrfs ]; then
mkdir $lxc_path/$lxc_name
if ! out=$(btrfs subvolume create $rootfs 21); then
echo $(basename $0): failed to create subvolume in $rootfs: $out 2
exit 1;
On 02/27/2013 10:41 AM, Stéphane Klein wrote:
Hi,
I'm wonder if there is a command to see the status of all container ?
example :
# lxc-info --all
'foo' is STOPPER
'bar' is RUNNING
…
I've see this script
https://github.com/phbaer/lxc-tools/blob/master/lxc-status
This feature is
On 02/26/2013 07:36 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Oddly, tail -f doesn't seem to be working properly inside my container.
It displays ten lines, and then sits forever. ^C and running it again
shows a more up to date ten lines, but then sits forever.
strace shows:
...
inotify_init()
On 02/26/2013 08:24 PM, Csordás Csaba Ifj. wrote:
Is it possible to run a database server in an LXC container?
Yes.
Does anybody accomplished this task with Oracle XE 10g/11g?
Yes. However at this very moment I'm not sure it's 10g.
I can't get it to working, and I need to be sure.
In fact,
On 02/25/2013 12:36 PM, Csordás Csaba Ifj. wrote:
Hi,
when using the oracle template on a Debian host
yum install mc
wants to install 71M of dependencies (77 Packages). The were already
installed during container creation.
How to tell yum to recognize those packages?
You have to fix
On 02/20/2013 12:06 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
On 02/19/2013 11:53 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
At this point, there will be a /var/lib/lxc/ltest/config which will
list lxc.rootfs = /var/lib/lxc/ltest/rootfs. So these steps are not
quite what you want.
Perhaps you just want to
sudo lxc-create
On 02/22/2013 03:22 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
About what? What I described above should work.
Yes, that's correct.
It doesn't (at least for me) that's why it is a bug, I guess;)
Note also that the staging branch now supports '-P|--lxcpath' for all
commands, so you could simply
sudo
On 02/22/2013 04:04 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
Once every user will be able to just run lxc containers, you don't want
them to have to check what container names the others are using to avoid
clashing with them.
I see, you're absolutely right.
It'd have been confusing to restrict system
On 02/22/2013 04:04 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Oh, my recipe wasn't quite right - when you
sudo sed -i 's@/var/lib/lxc@/data/lxc@' /var/lib/lxc/r2/config
that also changes the path to r2's fstab. So either you have to
tweak the sed command, or
sudo mv /var/lib/lxc/r2/fstab
hi All,
Who is the admin for this list?
Failed to deliver to 'msklizman...@ebuddy.com'
SMTP module(domain mail-in.ebuddy.com:25) reports:
host mail-in.ebuddy.com:25 says:
550 5.1.1 User unknown
If he/she doesn't have enough for that, I'd like to do it so much.
I cannot help the project
On 02/22/2013 04:49 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
We're planning on setting up a default lxcpath for user run containers,
-P will just be used to override this.
Excellent.
Thanks,
tamas
--
Everyone hates slow
hi Serge and Others,
lxc version: 0.9.0.alpha3
lxcpath=/data/lxc
tank/lxc/ltest on /tank/lxc/ltest type zfs (rw,noatime)
# sh -x /usr/bin/lxc-create -n ltest -t ubuntu
+ . /usr/share/lxc/lxc.functions
+ globalconf=/etc/lxc/lxc.conf
+ bindir=/usr/bin
+ templatedir=/usr/share/lxc/templates
+
On 02/19/2013 11:53 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
At this point, there will be a /var/lib/lxc/ltest/config which will
list lxc.rootfs = /var/lib/lxc/ltest/rootfs. So these steps are not
quite what you want.
Perhaps you just want to
sudo lxc-create -n ltest -t ubuntu
sudo mkdir -p
On 02/11/2013 04:11 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Agreed, please do get us precise reproduction steps so we can look into
it and fix it.
I'm sorry about the delay.
I tested is again and I'm quite surprised, that you're right. If it's at the
originial location,
then it just works fine.
If you can
On 02/10/2013 12:06 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu
mailto:tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
On 02/09/2013 12:41 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote: Or just suggest a way to
modify containers
configuration.
Sorry, can you
On 02/07/2013 11:42 PM, Christoph Willing wrote:
On 08/02/2013, at 8:37 AM, Papp Tamas tom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
hi All,
Actually there was already a topic about this, but I don't really remember
the result, because with
lxc v0.7 the rootfs was removed only if it existed in /var/lib
On 02/08/2013 12:10 AM, Roland Neary wrote:
Sorry to hear you b0rked your setup. Are you perhaps a Xen user who found out
that `'xm destroy` !=
lxc-destroy?
If so, you're probably not the first
Actually neither xen, nor virsh destroys _data_ and until v0.7 (or v0.8?) lxc
does it only
On 02/04/2013 02:35 PM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
I have made a lxc centos template
https://github.com/kalyanceg/lxc-centos
Thanks Kalyana, unfortunately it doesn't seem to work correctly, because there
is only an init
process started, nothing else.
However the script from the recent tarball
On 02/05/2013 11:34 AM, Roland Neary wrote:
Hi Tamas,
I recetly setup CentOS on Ubuntu with a slight variation of
https://gist.github.com/hagix9/3514296
hi,
What changes did you make?
If it's not necessary, I don't want to make double work.
10x
tamas
On 02/05/2013 01:56 PM, Roland Neary wrote:
Nothing exciting, I modified a few values such as dns servers which were
hardcoded into the script
but not appropriate for my setup.
As is the script worked out of the box, I just didn't fancy fixing these
niggling issues by hand as
I made quite
hi All,
Is there a template available that can be used to create working CentOS 6
containers out of box?
Thank you,
tamas
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download
On 01/30/2013 01:13 PM, Ben Butler-Cole wrote:
Hello
I find that I can't do a read-write bind mount within a container (that is to
say, the source and
target for the mount are both within the container's own filesystem). I
believe that it is being
restricted to read-only by Apparmour.
I
On 01/24/2013 05:47 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On ubuntu 12.04, I tried the minimalist command
sudo lxc-create -n foo
without a -t option. This completed very quickly (yay) but then
sudo lxc-start -n foo
hung (after complaining there was no fstab.old or something).
Is that supposed to
On 01/10/2013 05:36 PM, Sujay M wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a container vm0 using the ubuntu template. I want to use
/mnt/sdb1/ as loopback
storage. so if i try to mount it i'm getting
root@vm0:~# mount /mnt/sdb1/
mount: Could not find any loop device. Maybe this kernel does not know
On 01/10/2013 06:10 PM, Sujay M wrote:
In the container config:
lxc.aa_profile = lxc-container-default--with-
loops
# loop
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 7:* rwm
lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 10:237 rwm
Should i create a new container with this property in config file or will it
On 01/10/2013 07:16 PM, Sujay M wrote:
Hi Tamas,
Thanks a lot for the help. You've almost solved my problem, The previous loop
error is not there but
I'm getting write-protected error when trying to mount
root@vm0:/srv# ls -l swift-disk
-rw-r--r-- 1 ubuntu ubuntu 10 Jan 10 18:01
On 12/21/2012 11:15 PM, Jun Yang wrote:
Hi all,
I just rented a dedicated server. My provider only has CentOS 6.3 available.
I have had great
experience with LXC on Ubuntu. But I am a beginner on CentOS. From Google
search I can only find
very scarce information about how to install
On 12/12/2012 10:54 AM, Kalyana sundaram wrote:
Hey
I have set up some 10 containers on two different host machines with veth
setup
My network config is
lxc.network.type = veth
lxc.network.flags = up
lxc.network.link = br0
lxc.network.ipv4 = x.x.x.x/23
Did you specified real IP address
hi All,
Regarding the bug #1087765 is there a way in Ubuntu to specify the starting
order of containers?
I this this code in /etc/init/lxc.conf:
for f in /etc/lxc/auto/*; do
c=$(basename $f .conf)
lxc-info -n $c 2/dev/null | grep state | grep -q RUNNING ||
lxc-start -n
On 10/22/2012 09:05 PM, olx69 wrote:
Hello,
basically I did follow
http://wiki.1tux.org/wiki/Centos6/Installation/Minimal_installation_using_yum
Additionally I added
echo pts/0 /etc/securetty
to the lxc container to allow root login, but it doesn't allow me this.
Any hints for this?
hi All,
Is there any news about this in the mainline kernel?
I didn't see it in the kernel changelog.
Thank you,
tamas
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app
On 10/15/2012 09:50 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
There are a few scripts already using python3-lxc to manage containers,
Jonathan Carter has one on his github:
https://github.com/highvoltage/llxc
Is there an uptodate LXC ppa available?
Maybe Serge, do you plan to update your backport PPA int he
On 10/08/2012 09:47 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
Are there recommendations on cluster filesystems?
I have several hosts with fibre channel. They should use a common
filesystem to have a half-automatic fail-over.
I think you should be able to use any of the cluster FS (eg. gluster,
moosefs,
On 10/08/2012 05:00 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
should - I prefer recommendations ny experience :-)
I have tried by myself gluster and it is HORRIBLE slow.
With GFS I have heard of several fatal crashes with data corruption.
Also GFS locking mechanism is not the best if I know well.
If you are
On 10/08/2012 05:58 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
Moosefs is FUSE based (for clients) and therefore will be very slow. I
suspect NFS is faster, even on (only) GbE.
Glusterfs is also fuse based.
If you don't want that, try Lustre.
NFS is faster, but it's not clusterfs.
Ubuntu 12.04 does not
hi All,
How is this counted? Should it be in a separated namespace?
I see sometimes, that too many files are opened, which is not possible
_inside_ the container.
Recently with
Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64
lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu58
kernel 3.2.0-25-generic
Thank you,
tamas
hi,
I created a group for LXC on linkedin. If I see well, there is no other
group, like this.
Is a project logo available?
Should an invitation be sent to this list?
Thanks,
tamas
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
On 06/15/2012 04:49 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Stéphane Graber (stgra...@ubuntu.com):
On 06/15/2012 09:10 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi All,
I upgraded initscripts package:
# apt-get install initscripts
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Recommended packages
On 06/19/2012 11:34 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
The difference is, many people (like me) when getting at invitation to
linkedin, will simply delete it or mark it as spam. Cause there's just
too many people who sends invitation to everyone in their address
book.
Sending the link, with a
hi All,
I upgraded initscripts package:
# apt-get install initscripts
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Recommended packages:
psmisc
The following packages will be upgraded:
initscripts
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 46 not upgraded.
Need to get
On 06/14/2012 11:40 PM, -- NeoX -- wrote:
#!/bin/bash
[...custom script...]
In Ubuntu 12.04 there is a custom script called lxc-list:
#!/bin/sh
set -e
if [ ! -x $(which lxc-info 2/dev/null) ]
then
echo E: lxc-info - no such file
exit 1
fi
for _STATUS in RUNNING STOPPED
do
On 05/30/2012 04:28 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/29/2012 10:10 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
On 05/29/2012 07:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/29/2012 03:48 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi All,
This doesn't work now:
ioctl(3, SIOCGIFNAME, {ifr_index=0, ifr_name=???}) = -1 ENODEV
On 05/04/2012 09:04 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Fri 2012-05-04 (00:05), Samuel Maftoul wrote:
Maybe, the uptime of container's init process will show you uptime of the
container (so is accessible from within the container).
init does not provide its start time
I have now written a special
On 05/14/2012 12:10 PM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
hi,
Sorry for the useless noise.
Easy to be confused about this paramaters.
Ah, right. In that case, perhaps postgresql somehow allocates different
amounts of SHM based on some autodetection mechanism or other
circumstance, and lxc is
hi!
I want to increase shared_buffers value.
Machine has 8GB of RAM.
OS is Ubuntu Precise on both host and container.
kernel.shmmax = 2147483648
kernel.shmall = 2147483648
kernel.shmmni = 4096
Originally the maximum value was 25M, I don't know how, but I could
increase it until 29M.
It starts
On 05/07/2012 05:19 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Running hostname --fqdn in an lxc client returns an error
message on stderr and an empty string on stdout:
# hostname --fqdn
hostname: Name or service not known
This breaks
On 05/03/2012 07:01 PM, Patrick Kevin McCaffrey wrote:
Hello list,
I've been doing some work on my LXC setup lately. I have several Debian
containers set up under an Ubuntu 12.04 host. Each container runs different
services (email, web, database, etc.), and I've been trying to figure out
hi,
There is this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/986043
Has anybody meet it ever? Does anybody have an idea?
Thank you,
tamas
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the
On 04/20/2012 10:10 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Papp Tamastom...@martos.bme.hu wrote:
hi,
There is this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/986043
Has anybody meet it ever? Does anybody have an idea?
Not in my setup.
$ ifconfig br0
On 04/20/2012 05:31 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Bugs like these have cropped up occasion, and often go completely
unreproduced and un-diagnosed. Often they turn out to be caused by
funky router settings neaby.
There is no router in this case:)
I mean, I hope the problem is not something about the
hi,
I guess something is still not good.
Setting up util-linux (2.20.1-1ubuntu3) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
(Reading database ... 12314 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace udev 175-0ubuntu6 (using
On 04/02/2012 03:22 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
hi,
I guess something is still not good.
Yes, a bug was re-opened on that last week. See bugs http://pad.lv/969299
and http://pad.lv/925024.
Nezd time I check launchpad:)
Thanks,
tamas
On 03/30/2012 07:58 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Funky.
Can you turn off apache and mysqld (switch the startup jobs to not run)
and see if the container behaves better?
Good idea:
# lsof|grep -c mysql.log
1008
init 1 root 1016w REG 253,0 1407936
270760
Does somebody have any idea about this?
Thanks,
tamas
On 03/28/2012 02:25 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
On 03/28/2012 11:26 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi!
I have a container, which init process uses 100% CPU.
If I create a strace dump from it:
open(/dev/ptmx, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY) = -1 EMFILE (Too
hi!
I have a container, which init process uses 100% CPU.
If I create a strace dump from it:
open(/dev/ptmx, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY) = -1 EMFILE (Too many open files)
close(1022) = 0
close(1023) = 0
pipe([1022, 1023]) =
On 03/28/2012 11:26 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi!
I have a container, which init process uses 100% CPU.
If I create a strace dump from it:
open(/dev/ptmx, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY) = -1 EMFILE (Too many open files)
close(1022) = 0
close(1023
On 03/08/2012 04:30 PM, Papp Tamas wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi All,
I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
suggestion:
1. I suggest ntpdate not to be installed (remove
hi All,
I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
suggestion:
1. I suggest ntpdate not to be installed (remove after debootstrap).
Also I think 'update-rc.d -f ondemand remove' would be fine in the
On 03/08/2012 09:27 AM, Papp Tamas wrote:
hi All,
I always created an own template with debootstrap and I used it.
Now I tried lxc-create -t ubuntu and I still have some question and
suggestion:
1. I suggest ntpdate not to be installed (remove after debootstrap).
Also I think 'update
On 03/07/2012 09:58 AM, 陈竞 wrote:
i want to start lxc-sshd, but get error:
localhost lxc # /usr/local/bin/lxc-start -n sshd
lxc-start: No such file or directory - failed to rename cgroup
/cgroup//lxc/9740-/cgroup//lxc/sshd
lxc-start: failed to spawn 'sshd'
lxc-start: No such file or
On 03/07/2012 07:18 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
It's possible but I wouldn't recommend it until 12.04.
In my experience upgrading will at least require you to umount
/lib/init/fstab and tty[1234] and console in /dev, otherwise udev,
mountall and a few others will fail to upgrade.
I tried it
On 03/05/2012 05:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 03/01/2012 06:49 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Tue 2011-10-18 (14:54), Papp Tamas wrote:
Is it possible to limit the maximum number of processes per container?
I have the same problem. A user has killed the host (and therefore all
containers
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Worked fine for me. Tested create and clone of ubuntu, ubuntu and
ubuntu-cloud images, with dir and lvm backing stores.
On 02/15/2012 11:51 AM, bruce bushby wrote:
Hi
I've been following these two guides:
https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-67682
http://berrange.com/posts/2011/09/27/getting-started-with-lxc-using-libvirt/
and I finally have a container running (Happy Days) I wanted to ask
the list if
On 02/15/2012 11:51 AM, bruce bushby wrote:
Hi
I've been following these two guides:
https://access.redhat.com/kb/docs/DOC-67682
http://berrange.com/posts/2011/09/27/getting-started-with-lxc-using-libvirt/
and I finally have a container running (Happy Days) I wanted to ask
the list if
On 02/01/2012 06:28 AM, Shweta Shinde wrote:
Thanks for your kind response.
As we see Ubuntu is making use of LXC to have virtualization over
cloud,
http://daniil.kulchenko.com/blog/2011/10/virtualization-using-lxc-linux-containers-in-amazon-ec2/interested
to know any insights about the same.
On 11/29/2011 05:15 PM, Patrick Kevin McCaffrey wrote:
I do not have a tty config file. Containers are new to me - how would I go
about seeing if there's a shell running on tty1? Sorry if these are silly
questions - just trying to understand more about how LXC works.
$ dpkg -S
On 11/27/2011 05:54 AM, Patrick Kevin McCaffrey wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to configure a few LXC guests on my Ubuntu machine. I have
configured the container using the methods described at
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/lxc-linux-containers/ and
On 11/15/2011 10:14 AM, bruce bushby wrote:
Hello
I'm hoping someone on the list could answer a couple of questions. I
believe Linux Containers are the perfect answer to some of the issues
I have at work but wanted to confirm some technical bits before
formally submitting any designs. I have
On 11/07/2011 06:44 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Tue 2011-01-11 (02:54), Mike wrote:
I noticed netfilter messages getting trashed in the various
/var/log/messages on a system with two containers, netfilter rules on
the host, and each container and the host running rsyslog. On closer
On 10/20/2011 12:54 AM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Wed 2011-10-19 (22:11), Papp Tamas wrote:
What version of lxc package do you use?
See my first mail:
lxc version: 0.7.4.1
Well, I don't see anything like this. Actually I use 0.7.5. Try to upgrade.
What do you see in system logs?
My
On 10/19/2011 12:36 AM, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
/But actually I think, lxc-virt.org sounds better./
I disagree with lxc-virt.org.
The difference between container and virtual machine is
already confusing enough. There is no virtualization layer in LXC, so
I don't think virt should
On 10/19/2011 07:24 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
Besides my problem with cannot stop/kill lxc-start (see other mail), I
have now an even more severe problem: I cannot start ANY container anymore!
I am sure I have overlooked something, but I cannot see what. I am really
desperate now, because
On 10/19/2011 09:18 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
root@vms1:/lxc# ps axf | grep vmtest1
31571 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -d
-o /data/lxc/vmtest1.log
2171 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -l
DEBUG -d -o
On 10/19/2011 09:28 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
On Wed 2011-10-19 (21:24), Papp Tamas wrote:
On 10/19/2011 09:18 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote:
root@vms1:/lxc# ps axf | grep vmtest1
31571 ?Ds 0:00 lxc-start -f /data/lxc/vmtest1.cfg -n vmtest1 -d
-o /data/lxc/vmtest1.log
2171
hi!
Is it possible to limit the maximum number of processes per container?
Thank you,
tamas
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application
On 10/18/2011 04:47 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UserNamespace
I've got a few patches to send yet for tightening down some remaining
privilege leaks, then we should be ready to start relaxing things to make
them usable. This includes Eric's simple implementation of
On 10/18/2011 10:30 PM, Brian K. White wrote:
So after looking at the IEEE site about applying for an OUI, it seems to
me there needs to be some actual entity to do that appplication. Since I
am not a principle developer nor is my company more than an interested
user, I can't really just go
On 10/17/2011 10:02 PM, Milos Negovanovic wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:36:24PM +0300, Iliyan ilf Stoyanov wrote:
Hi Milos,
have you tried doing lxc-console --name $NAME_OF_YOUR_CENTOS6_CONTAINER,
then loging in and issuing shutdown -h now. It works for me on Fedora
15/SL6.1.
BR,
On 10/17/2011 10:26 PM, Milos Negovanovic wrote:
If I am not mistaken thats similar approach to using this script:
http://pastie.org/2713689
Ive tried using that python script, but instead of shutting down my
container restarts! Can you paste your container /etc/inittab by any
chance?
On 10/17/2011 10:54 PM, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
/I tried the python script, it just works fine./
Q1: How does the kill -INT init method affect running processes,
especially MySQL and other databases that may need to shutdown
gracefully to avoid data corruption?
I believe that the
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
