Re: [lxc-users] Networking

2020-03-24 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:48 PM Saint Michael wrote: > > It is supported, there is no error, but there is no communication at all with > the gateway. If you start the same exact network configuration in the > container with the type=phys, it works fine, ergo, the issue is type=ipvlan. "exact n

Re: [lxc-users] Networking

2020-03-24 Thread Saint Michael
That scheme in my case would not work. I have two interfaces inside the container, and each one talks to a different network, for business reasons. I use policy-based-routing to make sure that packets go to the right places. I need that the container can hold a full configuration. In my case, I use

Re: [lxc-users] Networking

2020-03-24 Thread Michael Honeyman
I don't often write to this list so apologies as I'm probably messing up the thread somehow. Saint Michael wrote: "... Vmware only allows multiple macs if the entire network is set in promiscuous mode..." Not strictly LXC/LXD related, but VMware has implemented two solutions to this problem since

Re: [lxc-users] Networking

2020-03-24 Thread Saint Michael
The 6.7 solution from Vmware is very expensive in terms of licensing, nobody is going to upgrade because of that. The 6.5 solution is useless because the mac addresses never age, they accumulate. The real solution is to use a kernel 5.X plus ipvlan, and I already know it works fine, no need to set