The new version of the docs need fltflt.sty. It is not part of emTeX.
I'll add a note in INSTALL.OS2. Perhaps it's advisable to add an entry
to README or INSTALL, if you cannot be sure that it is standard on
UNIX.
If feasible, I'll bundle it with the bin package for OS/2.
Greets,
Arnd
Hi,
I am working on a LyX client, and I have suggested a small change in the
LyX server in order to make client implementation easier. The change was
to have LyX return an INFO message even for functions not returning any
data. This means that a client can always fetch a line from the LyX output
Hello everybody,
I tried to see how the latest LyX 1.0.3 will work on Linux/Alpha.
A system on which the experiment was conductucted is based on Red Hat
5.2 distribution with all erratas and other bug fixes; xforms library
is xforms-0.88-6 from Power Tools 5.2 set.
The first minor thing - spec
I found that I had several loose spaces before commas. I tried to use
find/replace to replace " ," with ",", but while it found them
correctly, it leaves the initial space, and places an additional space
*after* the comma (generally harmless, as it goes away), leaving the
offending space in
mathed's lexer has some really stupid hacks in it. Following TeX on what is a
macro makes the code *much* simpler and would eliminate even more if I could
rebuild math_hash.C (the CVS sources seem to lack to input to gperf). All the
change required is to put the first character after the \
I am working on a LyX client, and I have suggested a small change in the
LyX server in order to make client implementation easier.
If you think it's worth it, I will submit the following to this list:
[Lots of great stuff]
Of course it is worth it! The earlier you send this, the better
Can anybody think of a worse word to put on the first page tutorial
besides
DANGER?
How about something more redundant than repeating et cetera three times
in a row?
Can anybody think of a worse word to put on the first page tutorial
besides
DANGER?
Microsoft?
How about something more redundant than repeating et cetera three times
in a row?
It would have to be both repetitively redundant, and say the same thing
twice.
--
The new version of the docs need fltflt.sty. It is not part of emTeX.
I'll add a note in INSTALL.OS2. Perhaps it's advisable to add an entry
to README or INSTALL, if you cannot be sure that it is standard on
UNIX.
If feasible, I'll bundle it with the bin package for OS/2.
Greets,
Arnd
Hi,
I am working on a LyX client, and I have suggested a small change in the
LyX server in order to make client implementation easier. The change was
to have LyX return an INFO message even for functions not returning any
data. This means that a client can always fetch a line from the LyX output
Hello everybody,
I tried to see how the latest LyX 1.0.3 will work on Linux/Alpha.
A system on which the experiment was conductucted is based on Red Hat
5.2 distribution with all erratas and other bug fixes; xforms library
is xforms-0.88-6 from Power Tools 5.2 set.
The first minor thing - spec
I found that I had several loose spaces before commas. I tried to use
find/replace to replace " ," with ",", but while it found them
correctly, it leaves the initial space, and places an additional space
*after* the comma (generally harmless, as it goes away), leaving the
offending space in
> mathed's lexer has some really stupid hacks in it. Following TeX on what is a
> macro makes the code *much* simpler and would eliminate even more if I could
> rebuild math_hash.C (the CVS sources seem to lack to input to gperf). All the
> change required is to put the first character after
> I am working on a LyX client, and I have suggested a small change in the
> LyX server in order to make client implementation easier.
> If you think it's worth it, I will submit the following to this list:
[Lots of great stuff]
Of course it is worth it! The earlier you send this, the better
Can anybody think of a worse word to put on the first page tutorial
besides
DANGER?
How about something more redundant than repeating et cetera three times
in a row?
> Can anybody think of a worse word to put on the first page tutorial
> besides
> DANGER?
Microsoft?
> How about something more redundant than repeating et cetera three times
> in a row?
It would have to be both repetitively redundant, and say the same thing
twice.
--
16 matches
Mail list logo
