On 01-Oct-99 Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>
>> I wonder whether there is a non-zero probability that LyX's "native"
>> format will be dropped entirely at some point in the future.
>
> IMO the probability is high, but don't hold your breath.
>
If
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> I wonder whether there is a non-zero probability that LyX's "native"
> format will be dropped entirely at some point in the future.
IMO the probability is high, but don't hold your breath.
Alejandro
> You missed my point. With SGML and XML as the new standard for document
> interchange (even MS says they are moving Office to use it) then we won't
> have to worry about Word-binary-formats anymore.
I wonder whether there is a non-zero probability that LyX's "native"
format will be dropped ent
Hi,
If LANG=es, all spaces are converted to ñ in LyX code mode. Is it really
necessary to export all spaces as ~ under this layout?
Greets,
Alejandro
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 27 Sep, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I believe that as soon as LyX has a nice enough document
> >> importer-exporter it can become a major plater in the
> >> "word-proccessing" business.
>
> > Sorry if this has already been mentioned (I haven't been keeping up with the
> > list, I'm afraid). I just grabbed 1.0.4 as per Lars' announcement. I noticed
> > that, when converting a file to tex format, the filename is changed somewhat.
> > For example, 219f99-8-part1.lyx was exported as
> > Thus, my serious consideration to be a mercenary and taint the
> > pristine waters of Open Source code with filthy lucre ...
>
> I don't think anyone has ever really said Free software had to be free.
> (No, Stallman doesn't oppose paying for software its the not sharing
> code and ideas he d
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
> > > Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet
> > > Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a
> >
> > I have been looking into this although I haven't much time to d
> Sorry if this has already been mentioned (I haven't been keeping up with the
> list, I'm afraid). I just grabbed 1.0.4 as per Lars' announcement. I noticed
> that, when converting a file to tex format, the filename is changed somewhat.
> For example, 219f99-8-part1.lyx was exported as 219f99_
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Allan Rae wrote:
> > Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet
> > Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a
>
> I have been looking into this although I haven't much time to do the
> implementation. So far I've found at least twen
Sorry if this has already been mentioned (I haven't been keeping up with the
list, I'm afraid). I just grabbed 1.0.4 as per Lars' announcement. I noticed
that, when converting a file to tex format, the filename is changed somewhat.
For example, 219f99-8-part1.lyx was exported as 219f99_8_part1.
On 30 Sep 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mike> I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten.
> Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet
> Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:53:14PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > - there's a separate cookie for each directory. Sorry. I don't really think
> > it is changeable.
>
> The problem with this is that the customization feature is a
> per-directory thing, rather than a per-site thing.
On 30-Sep-99 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> If you insert that, it would be an error.
>
> Your patch is the correct fix.
>
> Greets,
>
> Asger
Okay, the binaries for SGI are now ready. One dynamic, one static against
XForms, as static linking against Xpm caused problems last time I did
> Besides, I
> would be much more excited about it if my pet \citet/\citep mechanism were
> implemented; I think that is a serious deficiency in LyX for use with
> AASTeX, and thus the AASTeX stuff is more of a toy than a real paper
> writing tool (sorry guys). I hate telling people "Yeah, LyX i
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mike> I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten.
Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet
Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a
Mike> serious deficiency in LyX for use with AASTeX,
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Amir Karger wrote:
> How come aastex isn't mentioned though? Mike might get offended that the
> physicists are considered more important than the astro-folk.
I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten. Besides, I
would be much more excited about it if my pe
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 09:31:51AM +0200, Thomas Steffen wrote:
> hi,
>
> ok, i'm still using lyx 1.0.1, which is a bit outdated, but maybe the
> bug is present in newer versions also. it is easy to reproduce:
>
> C-m ^ k [<-] [<-] \ a [BS] [BS]
>^ Crash here
>
> > And if we decide to use it, we would have to move it to one of our
> > machines. Maybe Lars has plans for that...
>
> I don't think so. sunsite.dk hosts a number of linux projects. I think asger
> had it set up with them so we could have cvs access.
Yes, sunsite is ready to go, but I think w
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And if we decide to use it, we would have to move it to one of our
>> machines. Maybe Lars has plans for that...
Amir> I don't think so. sunsite.dk hosts a number of linux projects. I
Amir> think asger had it set up with them so we could
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> We didn't update WHATSNEW! My suggestion:
>
> When is the last time you ran 'cvs up'?
Wow. Amir gets the stupid prize twice in two weeks.
How come aastex is
Just for the record, 'till somebody has some spare time:
Maybe due to recent reshuffles the php links are broken, LyX design
documents on suggested readings page provoke file not found error.
Greets,
Arnd
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:53:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Amir> So, since it contains more information, is (arguably) better
> Amir> structure, is easier to update (php3), and will be easier to
> Amir> access (sunsite dk vs
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> We didn't update WHATSNEW! My suggestion:
When is the last time you ran 'cvs up'?
JMarc
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amir> So, since it contains more information, is (arguably) better
Amir> structure, is easier to update (php3), and will be easier to
Amir> access (sunsite dk vs. via), I say let's start using it already!
Huh? We are not using via for www,
> - there's a separate cookie for each directory. Sorry. I don't really think
> it is changeable.
The problem with this is that the customization feature is a
per-directory thing, rather than a per-site thing.
> - Resurrect José's FAQ, update it, and put it on there? (Lars had talked
> about
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:34:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> Ok, this is an academic discussion, but I'm in an Academy so
> Jose> that is no trouble to me, if the value isn't used it certainly
> Jose> is
OK, folks.
Jean-Marc asked why we never switched over to the new LyX web site that
(Asger and) I worked so hard on building. The only answer I could come up
with was that I've been lazy and haven't mentioned it to anyone since July.
So, I did a minor update (mention v1.0.4 and the new languages)
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Jose> wrote:
>> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Jose> As a code style should I initialize that variables to som
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:21:18PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose> As a code style should I initialize that variables to some
> Jose> silly value, just to silent the warnings?
>
> Yes, But a not silly value i
> "Jose" == Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose> That's my code, and I have checked it now. That is not
Jose> possible, those initialization depends on several conditions
Jose> that are mutually exclusive, that is, or the variables are
Jose> initializated or the var
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:01:06PM +0100, Arnd Hanses wrote:
> > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready.
>
> Small footnotes:
>
> 2. spurious? warning:
> ---
> buffer.C: In method `void Buffer::DocBookHandleFootnote(struct _FILE *,
> class LyXParagraph *&, int)':
> buffer.C:2321: warning: `
We didn't update WHATSNEW!
My suggestion:
What's new in 1.0.4 compared to LyX version 1.0.3?
--
LyX 1.0.4 is a minor update to LyX 1.0.3. Besides fixing some bugs
compared to version 1.0.3 and enhancing stability, it adds the following
features:
> Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready.
Small footnotes:
1. Maybe it's a good idea to search first of all others in /intl for
include and lib files, in case included gettext is used. I recently
installed slightly incompatible libgettext header and lib in standard
locations and had to change t
> "Panu" == Panu Hällfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Panu> (Please CC: me when responding, I'm not subscribed to the list)
Panu> I'm currently translating the latest LyX to Finnish. (Yes,
Panu> trying to hurry - btw. what's the situation with 1.0.4? Am I in
Panu> a HURRY?-)
Well, you are no
(Please CC: me when responding, I'm not subscribed to the list)
I'm currently translating the latest LyX to Finnish.
(Yes, trying to hurry - btw. what's the situation with
1.0.4? Am I in a HURRY?-)
It has been somewhat problematic since I haven't managed
to get a developement version that compil
> "Thomas" == Thomas Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> hi, ok, i'm still using lyx 1.0.1, which is a bit outdated,
Thomas> but maybe the bug is present in newer versions also. it is
Thomas> easy to reproduce:
Thomas> C-m ^ k [<-] [<-] \ a [BS] [BS] ^ Crash here ^ Cursor left ^
Thom
> diff -u lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C lyx-new/src//table.C
> --- lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C Thu Sep 23 15:13:53 1999
> +++ lyx-new/src//table.CThu Sep 30 11:53:34 1999
> @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@
> return ret;
> }
>
> -const char *LyXTable::getDocBookAlign(int cell, bool isColumn=false)
>
Hi,
thanks a million for lyx 1.0.4!
greetings, Reinhard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reinhard Borek
Exp. Phys I
Fachbereich Physik
Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg
Friedemann-Bach-Platz 6
06108 Halle/Saale
On 30-Sep-99 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>> > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready.
I'm creating a binary of this for SGI's. To get it to compile, I have to
make the following minor change:
diff -u lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C lyx-new/src//table.C
--- lyx-1.0.4/src//table.C Thu Sep 23 1
> > Finally we have LyX version 1.0.4 ready.
Hi,
I have submited this to freshmeat.
--
José
41 matches
Mail list logo
