On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> If you try to design your library in C using OO techniques then you will
> probably find it becomes considerably less useful and maintainable than if
> you implemented it as C++ and provided a simple wrapper inter
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
[...]
> > If this is what you want, you might want to go elsewhere. The LyX
> > team is a C++ team, and I think we can admit that we do not have
> > the necessary expertice in wrapping C++ in a C sett
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> >
> > Yes most certanly but I want it to be generic enough that ANY project
> > can use it. I want to use C as it the most portable and will allow pure C
> > projects to use it. Using C++ would defeat the purpose
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> We don't need any foreigners! We could just have a National LDM ourselves!
>
> Of course, none of us actually know the LyX core well enough to get anything
> done, but we could certainly get together and drink cheap American beer!
There's always document
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote:
[...]
> Well, the question is then how this will work with the proposed
> integration of Signal/Slot for GUII. Much of what I wrote earlier was
> to help me understanding how things work in LyX. I realize that
> LyXFunc plays a central role in LyX
Hi
(if this gets to a list moderator: please forward this to the list if you
see fit. Feel free to edit it if you do)
I'm sending this to the list after I got an error in reply to a message I
tried to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Anyway - I'm now trying the hebrew lyx patch. Looks good.
To allow
> Of course, none of us actually know the LyX core well enough to get anything
> done, but we could certainly get together and drink cheap American beer!
Hey! Hey!
Even if beer is expensive in Norway, we *will* get together and drink it!
Greets,
Asger
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:27:08AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> I'm happy to announce that the LyX-User-Web has already partially been
> translated to italian BY Claudio Coco!
>
> You may try it out on: http://www.it.lyx.org/it
Great!
I'll mention it on the lyx.org i18n page.
Incidentally,
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 01:31:35PM -0600, Dr. Ing. Roland Krause wrote:
[lots of useful and intelligent discussion of LyX snipped]
> > Remember that we still have the LyX developers meetings to give the
> > program the huge bursts that any open source project needs from time
> > to time. At thos
Asger,
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
> > LyXFunc::Dispatch() is a monster if I ever saw one :-)
> ...
> > Yes - I see know why Dialogs is necessary though. But somehow I cant stop the
> > feeling that something is wrong with this design.
>
> What we have chosen to do is to split LyXFunc::Di
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> I confess to being subscribed to the aspell mailing list, so I'm
> probably the person Kevin is referring to.
>
> Regarding a generic reusable spell checker interface:
>
> I think the specs were already completed in the old discussion...
> W
> This is the latest version of my patch.
> Is the plan to apply it after 1.1.4 is out?
Yes, this is the plan.
Greets,
Asger
> Why the heights of the Combox lists are so small?
> For example, in the Citation popup, the list shows only 5 keys at a time,
> which makes it very difficult to use if you have large bibliography database.
> This can be fixed by changing line 87 of insets/insetbib.C from
> bibcombox->add(80,
> string ChangeExtension(string const & oldname, string const & extension,
> bool no_path)
> {
> string::size_type last_slash = oldname.rfind('/');
> string::size_type last_dot;
This is fine.
> if (last_slash != string::npos)
> last_dot = o
> LyXFunc::Dispatch() is a monster if I ever saw one :-)
...
> Yes - I see know why Dialogs is necessary though. But somehow I cant stop the
> feeling that something is wrong with this design.
What we have chosen to do is to split LyXFunc::Dispatch into separate
dispatchers. We'll have one in
I confess to being subscribed to the aspell mailing list, so I'm
probably the person Kevin is referring to.
Regarding a generic reusable spell checker interface:
I think the specs were already completed in the old discussion...
What remained in that discussion was just the final synthesis
and po
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 01:20:25PM +0100, Paul Seelig wrote:
> ii lyx 1.1.4-0pre1 High Level Word Processor
BTW when can we expect 1.1.4? Does it make sense to update to pre2 or shall
I wait? I did put the pre version in because
a) our 1.1.2 release was more a 1.1.3 because of bug fixes I ba
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 09:49:27AM +0100, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> I used LyX on RedHat without problems, but on Debian it works as well, but
> can't use Latex. It says while compiling that latex was found (it is
> there) but it is not usable.
Do you use a self compiled lyx? Or do you use
On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> Yes most certanly but I want it to be generic enough that ANY project
> can use it. I want to use C as it the most portable and will allow pure C
> projects to use it. Using C++ would defeat the purpose of my goals.
>
I guess if you have a nice API in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I used LyX on RedHat without problems, but on Debian it works as
> well, but can't use Latex. It says while compiling that latex was
> found (it is there) but it is not usable.
>
Is your tetex setup configured correctly?
> Do you know that as common problem ?
>
No,
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> >> That doesn't matter. Whatever you implement you can use that for other
> >> projects too. I don't think we are interested in working on other project
> >> too, as we already have little time for LyX right now
On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. Whatever you implement you can use that for other
>> projects too. I don't think we are interested in working on other project
>> too, as we already have little time for LyX right now (at least me ;)
>
> So you are saying you are not
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > The diffrence here is that you are only thinking of LyX I am thinking of
> > the bigger picture here.
> That doesn't matter. Whatever you implement you can use that for other
> projects too. I don't think we are interested in working on other project
>>
>> Well as much as I can see we have aspell support in LyX.
>
> Ok I have not taken a good look at the source but right now it seams
> that you still use ispell/aspell through a pipe interface.
>
Yes that's true!
>
> The diffrence here is that you are only thinking of LyX I am thinking of
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> Hi Kevin!
>
> On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > Back in February of 1999 I posted A proposal to integrate Aspell into
> > Lyx. I attached the relevant parts of the conversation as a text file
> > for quick review of those who where here and to bring those new to
Hi Kevin!
On 02-Feb-2000 Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> Back in February of 1999 I posted A proposal to integrate Aspell into
> Lyx. I attached the relevant parts of the conversation as a text file
> for quick review of those who where here and to bring those new to this
> list up to speed.
>
Well as
Back in February of 1999 I posted A proposal to integrate Aspell into
Lyx. I attached the relevant parts of the conversation as a text file
for quick review of those who where here and to bring those new to this
list up to speed.
However since then I have releases that all to many programs are n
Hi All!!!
I'm happy to announce that the LyX-User-Web has already partially been
translated to italian BY Claudio Coco!
You may try it out on: http://www.it.lyx.org/it
Hope you like it!
Jürgen
P.S.: This is work in progress only a few pages have been translated yet!!!
-._-._-._-._-._-._
Hi,
I used LyX on RedHat without problems, but on Debian it works as well, but can't use
Latex.
It says while compiling that latex was found (it is there) but it is not usable.
Do you know that as common problem ?
Every thing is installed fine regarding my Debian system.
Marko
29 matches
Mail list logo
