Allan Rae wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Allan Rae wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Just tried to make. Attached is the log.
xforms .88, gcc-2.95.2 libc2.1.3
Garst
D'oh! Fixed the fix now. Try again.
Allan. (ARRae)
It
Miyata Shigeru [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Since the current CVS does not use XmbLookupString(), LyX only receives
| raw keyboard events and there is no event processed by IM server.
Hmm, not quite true? 0.88 does not use XmbLookupString and we use the
LyXLookupString as we did earlier, but at
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
|
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
|
| Well to answer you what I think: [...]
| Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not NEW_INSETS: [...]
| My vote is 1.1.6 with ONLY NEW_TABULAR activated!
I think I'd be willing to do this for 1.1.6.
Ok then I'll do my best to fix all the "missing-feature" reports
I got till now (when time permits).
BTW.: Are you working on LyXGui-Class? I had in mind to remove all
xforms calls from
On 19-Aug-2000 Baruch Even wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
Whoever did the new FormDocument, I BLAME YOU!
Sorry for this harsh language, I'm too tired to think anymore. I apologize
You shouldn't be sorry it was friday, wasn't it ;)
Anyway I've seen Allan fixed this
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only static variables at file scope?)
Lgb
On 20-Aug-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
I thought that alt+enter (break paragraph, keep layout) would do what you
want (i.e., start a new paragraph, but keep it in the minipage)
but it doesn't. I consider this a bug, and it can be fixed by removing the
if condition in LyXParagraph::SetPExtraType
Baruch Even [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I've been given (read) access to the main cvs reposistory, however now
| thatg I'm on my aging computer I don't remember the CVSROOT required to
| access it (I've got the user and passwd).
|
| Can anyone refresh my memory? (It's working much like regular
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only
Hi!
before porting these dialogs to gnome frontend I would like to ask the
following questions:
FormCitation: I think that there is an important functionality missing in
this dialog. Namely, I really miss "Search" and bibtex parser. In my work,
I use bibtex database which has more than 1000
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
Finally, how can I fire up FormGraphics? Menu?
I'm the one who wrote it (and still do), so I'll answer.
This dialog is started up for the new insetgraphics, which is not yet at a
finished state so it doesn't appear in the menu. However you can do:
Hi Marko!
FormTabular: It looks like the functionality of this dialog box is
duplicated (partly) by Edit/Table menu. What is an expected evaluation of
this dialog? Will it be just used for borders or we will have two way
to add/remove columns ... ? Or maybe we will have a special toolbar
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (or is this only static variables at file scope?)
|
| Lgb
|
|
| Is this a c++ thing ?
No.
Try this:
#include stdio.h
static
int test1;
int test2;
int main()
{
int test3;
printf("test1: %d\n", test1);
printf("test2:
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No.
That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
embarrass myself C++-wise.
Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
BSS (or equivalent) is zeroed out on load. So it would be better IMHO not
to
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| No.
|
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
| BSS (or
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| No.
|
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't
If you use a filename with a % in it (mine was comps10%.lyx), the
following error occurs:
In ParsePup [xpopup.c 298] Unknown sequence %.
In PupParse [xpopup.c 304] Error while parsing pup entry
Everything still appears to work in spite of this message.
Kenneth
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
Hello Baruch,
At 06:35 AM 8/19/00 +0300, you wrote:
I'm the developer who works on the Graphics Inset, that is the component
that is responsible for the insertion of graphics into LyX documents and
emiting the LaTeX code for them. That is I'm
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 19-Aug-2000 Baruch Even wrote:
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
Whoever did the new FormDocument, I BLAME YOU!
Sorry for this harsh language, I'm too tired to think anymore. I apologize
You shouldn't be sorry it was friday,
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
|
| On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
|
| Well to answer you what I think: [...]
LyX seems to have developed acne. There are pimples everywhere now.
I think there is at least one we can squeeze out: the GUIRuntime pimple.
I can't see that it serves any useful purpose to have an extra class here
(other than helping extend compile times by a second or so). Why not just
share
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bj nes) wrote:
Hmm, not quite true? 0.88 does not use XmbLookupString and we use the
LyXLookupString as we did earlier, but at a different point in the X
callback chain. In 0.89 XForms uses XmbLookupStrin internally and we
only use XLookupString to get hold of
Allan Rae wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
>
> > Allan Rae wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > > > Just tried to make. Attached is the log.
> > > > xforms .88, gcc-2.95.2 libc2.1.3
> > > > Garst
> > >
> > > D'oh! Fixed the fix now. Try
Miyata Shigeru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Since the current CVS does not use XmbLookupString(), LyX only receives
| raw keyboard events and there is no event processed by IM server.
Hmm, not quite true? 0.88 does not use XmbLookupString and we use the
LyXLookupString as we did earlier, but
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
|
| >
| > On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > >
| > > NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
| >
| > Well to answer you what I think: [...]
| > Why activate NEW_TABULAR and not
>| > My vote is 1.1.6 with ONLY NEW_TABULAR activated!
>
> I think I'd be willing to do this for 1.1.6.
Ok then I'll do my best to fix all the "missing-feature" reports
I got till now (when time permits).
BTW.: Are you working on LyXGui-Class? I had in mind to remove all
xforms calls
On 19-Aug-2000 Baruch Even wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
>
>> Whoever did the new FormDocument, I BLAME YOU!
>
> Sorry for this harsh language, I'm too tired to think anymore. I apologize
You shouldn't be sorry it was friday, wasn't it ;)
Anyway I've seen Allan fixed this
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only static variables at file scope?)
Lgb
On 20-Aug-2000 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> I thought that alt+enter (break paragraph, keep layout) would do what you
> want (i.e., start a new paragraph, but keep it in the minipage)
> but it doesn't. I consider this a bug, and it can be fixed by removing the
> if condition in
Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've been given (read) access to the main cvs reposistory, however now
| thatg I'm on my aging computer I don't remember the CVSROOT required to
| access it (I've got the user and passwd).
|
| Can anyone refresh my memory? (It's working much like
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
> | would never use such, would you?
>
> Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
> (or is this
Hi!
before porting these dialogs to gnome frontend I would like to ask the
following questions:
FormCitation: I think that there is an important functionality missing in
this dialog. Namely, I really miss "Search" and bibtex parser. In my work,
I use bibtex database which has more than 1000
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Marko Vendelin wrote:
> Finally, how can I fire up FormGraphics? Menu?
I'm the one who wrote it (and still do), so I'll answer.
This dialog is started up for the new insetgraphics, which is not yet at a
finished state so it doesn't appear in the menu. However you can do:
Hi Marko!
>
> FormTabular: It looks like the functionality of this dialog box is
> duplicated (partly) by Edit/Table menu. What is an expected evaluation of
> this dialog? Will it be just used for borders or we will have two way
> to add/remove columns ... ? Or maybe we will have a special
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > (or is this only static variables at file scope?)
| >
| > Lgb
| >
|
| Is this a c++ thing ?
No.
Try this:
#include
static
int test1;
int test2;
int main()
{
int test3;
printf("test1: %d\n", test1);
printf("test2:
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No.
>
That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
embarrass myself C++-wise.
Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
BSS (or equivalent) is zeroed out on load. So it would be better IMHO not
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > No.
| >
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
| BSS (or
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > No.
> | >
> |
> | That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
> | embarrass myself C++-wise.
> |
> | Anyway, my point being,
If you use a filename with a % in it (mine was comps10%.lyx), the
following error occurs:
In ParsePup [xpopup.c 298] Unknown sequence %.
In PupParse [xpopup.c 304] Error while parsing pup entry
Everything still appears to work in spite of this message.
Kenneth
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Martijn Brouwer wrote:
> Hello Baruch,
> At 06:35 AM 8/19/00 +0300, you wrote:
> >I'm the developer who works on the Graphics Inset, that is the component
> >that is responsible for the insertion of graphics into LyX documents and
> >emiting the LaTeX code for them. That is
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Aug-2000 Baruch Even wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> >
> >> Whoever did the new FormDocument, I BLAME YOU!
> >
> > Sorry for this harsh language, I'm too tired to think anymore. I apologize
>
> You shouldn't be sorry it
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> |
> | >
> | > On 17-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > >
> | > > NEW_INSETS should be enabled at the same time, because:
> | >
> | > Well to answer you
LyX seems to have developed acne. There are pimples everywhere now.
I think there is at least one we can squeeze out: the GUIRuntime pimple.
I can't see that it serves any useful purpose to have an extra class here
(other than helping extend compile times by a second or so). Why not just
share
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bj nes) wrote:
> Hmm, not quite true? 0.88 does not use XmbLookupString and we use the
> LyXLookupString as we did earlier, but at a different point in the X
> callback chain. In 0.89 XForms uses XmbLookupStrin internally and we
> only use XLookupString to get
44 matches
Mail list logo
