Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>>
>> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>
| The problem seems to be that automake fails
I do not know whether anybody cares, but compilation fails with
lyxstring and compaq cxx as follows:
mycxx -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src
-I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel -I../..
-I../../../lyx-devel/boost
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> w/files?
This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
./autogen ; cd ../lyx-build ; ../lyx-devel/configure'
[no script, typed by
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 am, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I'd like to see what you come up with instead in QPreferences though...
>
> I don't believe it! You are proposing to work around the abuse of
> input() by adding an extra way of handling inputs (what you
> euphamistically call "Suspects")
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I do not know whether anybody cares, but compilation fails with
| lyxstring and compaq cxx as follows:
>
| mycxx -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src
|-I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel -I../..
I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
really don't know what I am doing there...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | As far as I understand these ipfx0() and isfx() methods are nowhere to
> | be found in the standard. If this is intended, compilation with
> | lyxstring should only be allowed with gcc.
>
> and older dec
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
>> w/files?
>
| This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
| ./autogen ; cd
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
| really don't know what I am doing there...
That is not where you want to change things.
--
Lgb
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | As far as I understand these ipfx0() and isfx() methods are nowhere to
>> | be found in the standard. If this is intended, compilation with
>> | lyxstring
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It is not really a matter of 'older', but of funky GNU extension.
> | I thought you were a standards guy.
>
> Yes I am: "Ditch lyxstring now!"
Tssk, tssk... You really need this bit of vacation.
JMarc
--
-
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:06:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> rpm -q automake
> automake-1.5-8
Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Building Makefile templates...
.
src/Makefile.am:12: LIBS was set with `+=' and is now set with `='
Hello PAP, I send my answer to lyx-devel too, because
I do not have much time right now.
I do not understand why the change to kluwer.layout may
help figure captions, but maybe someone else will :)
Concerning latexconfig.yx, I think the problem you see has
been corrected some time ago. Did you
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:50:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (unless some qt2 stuff uses things from it)
No. Nuke away (after ignoring my nuking patch twice I believe :P)
john
--
"It is very difficult to prophesy, especially when it pertains to the
future."
- Patrick
Hi all,
I just fell across a problem when I loaded an old (1.1.6) file into
lyx 1.2pre5:
It's a very ugly file, as I had to work alot with ERT. The old file
contained
\latex latex
\backslash
begin{multicols*}{2}[
\backslash
section*{
\color blue
{
\backslash
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:20:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> (partly to keep the cycle shorter, partly to work out what hierarchy
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one worried about 1.3. With the
current stuff slated for it, it won't be out until 2004 :(
regards
john
--
"It is very difficult
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:35:36PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Where do we document this ?
Thou must use 1.5.1. No more, no less. 1.5.1 must be the number thou
must use, and the number of the use must be 1.5.1. 1.6 shalt thou not
use, nor either use thou 1.4, excepting that
On Thursday 16 May 2002 3:21 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:20:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > (partly to keep the cycle shorter, partly to work out what hierarchy
>
> I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one worried about 1.3. With the
> current stuff slated for it, it won't be
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:12:18AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Is there anything special required to run this?
>
> I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
>
>
> make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
> make[4]: *** No rule to make
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> > w/files?
>
> This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
>
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Isn't that what branches are for? Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play
> there. Ditto André/Jürgen could set up a RewriteCursorCodeToUseMetrics
> branch. It isn't too hard to maintain a branch against changes in head if the
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> And are they ? (in spec file)
Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
development/lyx.spec?
There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
How does rpm now what spec file to use?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > And are they ? (in spec file)
>
> Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
>
> development/lyx.spec?
>
> There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Isn't that what branches are for?
To a degree. But big changes like GUII and not going to play well with
other big changes.
> Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play there.
Yes please, at least temporarily. I need some help
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In the end everything will be a big mess, and we declare "fix up time",
Isn't this what happened with the abandoned development tree ?
I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
minor changes, and
On Thursday 16 May 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Isn't that what branches are for?
>
> To a degree. But big changes like GUII and not going to play well with
> other big changes.
>
> > Why don't we set up a GUII branch and
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
>
> It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake 1.5
(neither 1.4 nor 1.6). Should be documented somehow. Maybe even some
On Thursday 16 May 2002 4:36 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: I've put a lyx-1.2.0pre5-1-suse73.i386.rpm into yur incoming/forlyx.
> Actually it was called lyx-1.3.0cvs-1.i386.rpm, but we are not in the
> 1.3.0series, are we?
Since Lars moved 1.2 off into it's own branch, we are yes.
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:19:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
> minor changes, and trying to keep to it.
Ok... a few things on my agenda:
global
- context sensitive keybindings
- better .tex -> .lyx coversion
-
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
> >
> > It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
>
> Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake
I haven't paid any attention to these different make targets. Could someone
tell me which one I should use if I wanted to make a tarball for the DEC
Alpha users out there? "make dist"?
And can I build that with src dir != build dir?
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> It is now in ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel
I just noticed that the dependencies are "redhat like".
There is neither tetex-latex nor tetex-dvi on SuSE, the stuff is in
te_latex and tetex proper.
[OTOH, SuSE users a used
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> We should gradually filter your own personal tree into the branch.
Would that it were so easy, unless you are prepared to take merges that
leave an uncompilable lyx. The nature of the beast makes it near
impossible to split
On Thursday 16 May 2002 5:23 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > We should gradually filter your own personal tree into the branch.
>
> Would that it were so easy, unless you are prepared to take merges that
> leave an uncompilable lyx. The
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:28:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> That's what I meant. One logical change at a time, then does it work with
> xforms and with Qt? Great, let's make the next logical change.
But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
Anyway, Qt is NOT important
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> - context sensitive keybindings
Already this is likely to clash with GUII :(
How seriously I don't know.
> - better .tex -> .lyx coversion
Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
> - the "cursor stuff"
can someone confirm?
- open new doc
- choose document->class->book(koma class)
- choose document->language->spanish
- write a word
-> dvi-view gives an error
the command
\addto\extrasspanish{\bbl@deactivate{~}}
is unknown
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Thursday 16 May 2002 5:43 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:28:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > That's what I meant. One logical change at a time, then does it work with
> > xforms and with Qt? Great, let's make the next logical change.
>
> But how can we tell it works
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
>
> Well that's it. I'd like to get each logical change up and running properly.
This will certainly be slow, although I doubt it will be sure.
I suppose this is the
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:01 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
> >
> > Well that's it. I'd like to get each logical change up and running
> > properly.
>
> This will certainly
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:14:05PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But will mean that you can take people along with you. Dumping a huge change
> on us will mean that you're the only one who knows what's going on at all.
Perhaps. But bear in mind that in fact the changes are conceptually very
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 pm, John Levon wrote:
> So, Lars, can we have a branch ??
Hes' on holiday I believe. Why don't you see if you can create one and commit
to it...
Angus
Would it seem a good idea to merge the CJK patch for support of
multibyte character sets with the main trunk sometime in the near
future (such as for 1.3)?
Supporting a whole extra version of LyX is probably a pain in the
rear. Moreover, merging it in would be a good step towards Unicode/Omega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 16 May 2002 18:53, Herbert Voss wrote:
> can someone confirm?
No, working here.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQCVAwUBPOQRZbewfbDGmeqhAQGD0AQAiWs0Vcrb+9Z2qSkkFirMDidcToKfnNyt
Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Thursday 16 May 2002 18:53, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>can someone confirm?
>>
>
> No, working here.
ok, I see,
thanks
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:47:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > - better .tex -> .lyx coversion
>
> Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
Yes. That's mine.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan
Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> Would it seem a good idea to merge the CJK patch for support of
> multibyte character sets with the main trunk sometime in the near
> future (such as for 1.3)?
No. The CJK patch is not something we want to see merged with its
current status, and xforms-0. is not
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:18:12AM +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
> I am going to submit a patch for xforms when I can find a time, but
> on the second thought, an OS/2 support patch I sent a year and a half
> ago was not been incorporated in xforms-0.
This was before the proper merge of
Herbert et al,
This works on my file. I now get the same output as 1.1.6. Haven't had an
extensive play with it though, so I can't comment on anything else the
patch does.
Rod
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> >
> > Just opened a file of mine, from 1.1.6fix4,
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Isn't that what branches are for? Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play
> > there. Ditto André/Jürgen could set up a RewriteCursorCodeToUseMetrics
> > branch. It isn't too hard to
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 am, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> > Allan. (ARRae)
>
> Why don't you read the bloody code before talking a pile of crap?
Not all the pile was crap but after reading the code I now see that
some of it might have been.
> There
reading the attached 1.1.6 file with latest cvs gives
a lot of errors. maybe most of them are math-related??
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
test.tgz
Description: Binary data
Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> This works on my file. I now get the same output as 1.1.6. Haven't had an
> extensive play with it though, so I can't comment on anything else the
> patch does.
>
>>
>>>Just opened a file of mine, from 1.1.6fix4, which has a number of
>>>non-floating eps files. The output
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:19:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
> > minor changes, and trying to keep to it.
>
> Ok... a few things on my agenda:
>
>
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
