Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It seems to me that we have control over the contents of
> boost_concept_check.h,
Hmm, I need sudo if I want to change the contents of
/usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.3/c++/bits/boost_concept_check.h
This was incorporated into GCC and is not in lyx-devel
Andreas Vox wrote:
>> So this should absolutely be reported to apple. Then they can fix it.
>
> I just did that. (problem ID 3932345, if anyone cares)
>
> While we wait on Apple to fix this, couldn't we use the wonderful
> and apparently indispensable "-isystem" option of GCC?
>
> We could fix t
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> So this should absolutely be reported to apple. Then they can fix it.
I just did that. (problem ID 3932345, if anyone cares)
While we wait on Apple to fix this, couldn't we use the wonderful
and apparently indispensable "-isystem" option of GC
On Åroda 22 grudzieÅ 2004 05:45 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Kuba Ober wrote:
> >>for more than 10 years the latex world is waiting for a
> >>parser, which works ...
> >
> > TeX? I presume that the safest, if not very lightweight way would be to
> > use TeX itself.
> >
> > Reimplementing crux of TeX a
Kuba Ober wrote:
for more than 10 years the latex world is waiting for a
parser, which works ...
TeX? I presume that the safest, if not very lightweight way would be to use
TeX itself.
Reimplementing crux of TeX as far as macro processing goes isn't that hard if
one has TeXbook handy, but if on
> for more than 10 years the latex world is waiting for a
> parser, which works ...
TeX? I presume that the safest, if not very lightweight way would be to use
TeX itself.
Reimplementing crux of TeX as far as macro processing goes isn't that hard if
one has TeXbook handy, but if one could just
Georg Baum wrote:
\def\foo#1#2{baz #1 #2}
is also possible, and in also in other combination
Oh yes. Is anybody masochistic enough to look at the various \def variants?
I ignored them completely until now.
it is senseless to parse all these macro definitions.
\def\foo#1#2{...}
\def\foo#1:#2{...}
\
Angus Leeming wrote:
> To be specific, I don't see why
> 1. ExpandPath is needed at all.
> 2. What the thing inside the if block is meant to be achieving.
> 3. What the idea behind removing "/.libs/" is all about. Surely, the LyX
> executable is to be found at build_dir/src/lyx if it's being run i
Herbert Voss wrote:
> \def\foo#1#2{baz #1 #2}
>
> is also possible, and in also in other combination
Oh yes. Is anybody masochistic enough to look at the various \def variants?
I ignored them completely until now.
Georg
Here comes an early christmas gift: fix bug 1542.
The problem is that the math parser may try to add too many rows or columns
to equation types that don't support them, e.g the following two equations
do not work:
\begin{multline}
1&2\\
\end{multline}
\begin{equation}
1\\[2mm]
2\\
3
\end{equation
I'm trying to understand why all this is needed to ascertain the full path
to argv[0], passed to LyX from the command line.
string arg0 = internal_path(argv[0]);
// Expand "./" and "~/"
string expanded_arg0 = ExpandPath(arg0);
if (!os::is_absolute_path(expanded_arg0)) {
//
Georg Baum wrote:
The patch is not 100% correct, because it does ignore the scope of the
commands. This is only a problem if somebody does redefine a command with a
different number of arguments, e.g. something like the attached .tex file.
Implementing correct scoping would be some work, it would
The attached patch fixes bug 1750. The first problem was that the second
optional argument of \newcommand was not handled in the preamble. The
second problem was that self defined commands were not stored in
known_commands and therefore not parsed correctly when they had a optional
argument.
The pa
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This may be the kind of situation where we could have a --strict
> option to tex2lyx that uses ERT every time there is a tiny difference,
> the default being to use the translation that makes more sense.
Yes. One could even think of finer granularity (writer2latex ha
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> So there is a visible difference between the two. I am
Georg> therefore not changing tex2lyx and leave \underline in ERT.
This may be the kind of situation where we could have a --strict
option to tex2lyx that uses ERT every time ther
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Angus> Or are all warning messages just output in English until the
>> Angus> localedir and its po files is found? It all feels very 'chicken
>> Angus> and egg'-ish.
>>
>> Yes. I think that's good enough.
>
| Actually, the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Or are all warning messages just output in English until the
> Angus> localedir and its po files is found? It all feels very 'chicken
> Angus> and egg'-ish.
>
> Yes. I think that's good enough.
Actually, the 'real' solution would be for lyxerr to store a
vect
Andreas Vox wrote:
> The code is equivalent to
> \def\underbar#1{\underline{\sbox2{#1}\dp2 0\box2}}
>
> which stores its argument in box #2, sets the box' depth to zero and uses
> this box as an argument to \underline.
>
> This means that \underline puts the bar beneath any text while \underbar
>
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> This means that \underline puts the bar beneath any text
Andreas> while \underbar puts the bar at the baseline, cutting through
Andreas> ys, gs, qs, ps etc.
Andreas> \underbar looks more useful to me for emphasing text.
Thanks f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Changing LyX to use \underline instead of \underbar would
> be nice too, but I am not sure it is safe.
Or maybe switch to ulem or soul (which results of course in data change).
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> I think that the word count feature is the most important
Juergen> task for now. People will love you for this.
That was the idea (not having people love me, but doing something
about it).
Juergen> All other things can
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx:
>
> \def\underbar#1{\underline{\sbox\tw@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I do not understand this definition and need therefore help: Should tex2lyx
> recognize \underline as \underbar and print
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Yes, to me :-)
>
> What do you need? Just footnotes? All floats? If we output too much
> information, it will be more distracting than useful.
Maybe: Footnotes, Figure Floats, Table Floats. But see below.
>>> - length of sentences and paragraphs: that's no
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephan> ... and last but not least, the attached example file.
Thanks for the file. I really do not know what happens. Actually I did
my testing with 'Spacing above' in paragraph layout, and there a
custom value of 140pt does not lead t
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - number of floats, footnotes: is this really useful to anybody?
Juergen> Yes, to me :-)
What do you need? Just footnotes? All floats? If we output too much
information, it will be more distracting than useful.
>> - length o
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Or are all warning messages just output in English until the
Angus> localedir and its po files is found? It all feels very 'chicken
Angus> and egg'-ish.
Yes. I think that's good enough.
JMarc
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | -
Lars> edit time: how would we do that?
Lars> You would need to store when the doc was created in the doc.
But this does not count the time during which it was open (non
read
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> tex2lyx does not convert \underline, see
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594. This is correct
Georg> in a strict sense, because LyX uses \underbar, not \underline.
Georg> From /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Concerning the stats you propose:
>
> - paragraph count: should be easy, just count the number of times
> where dit.pos() == 0.
>
> - sentence count: how do you do this? Count each occurence of `.!?' ?
> Do : and ; close a sentence?
Never ask this question to a lin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> I have decided, therefore, to implement your desired 'package'
> Angus> class as a standalone program. It's certainly not finished
> Angus> (getting lost in the logic of system_lyxdir) but the bones are
> Angus> below.
>
> What you propose looks good to me.
No
Stephan Witt wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ snip ]
... and last but not least, the attached example file.
Thank you for taking this issue.
And now the included graphics... (I forgot it).
Regards,
Stephan
<>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephan> Dear LyX developers, today I managed to configure and compile
Stephan> latest 1.3.x lyx from CVS. While testing the resulting binary
Stephan> I detected a minor but serious problem: the lyxlength numbers
Ste
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| - edit time: how would we do that?
You would need to store when the doc was created in the doc.
>
| - length of sentences and paragraphs: that's not too difficult, but do
| we need it?
No, but some poeple like to see how complex their sentenc
tex2lyx does not convert \underline, see
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594. This is correct in a strict
sense, because LyX uses \underbar, not \underline.
>From /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@}}
I do not understand this definition
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> In frontends/qt2/ui/Makefile.am?
Lars> I am not sure. all .C files should already depend on PCH_FILE,
Lars> so I am not sure that it will make a difference anyway.
Lars> How come you get the gch with a path?
Lars> Is this src
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I was referring to Mandrake. If this is the latest and greatest
| Lars> why ship an old compiler.
>
| Well, Mandrakelinux 10.1 was released in october. Since gcc 3.4.2 was
|
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I think we should call the menu entry "Statistics", and prepare
Lars> not only tohave word cound but also paragraph cound, sentence
Lars> count. Number of floats, footnotes, edit time, length of
Lars> sentences lengt of paragrap
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For as long as LyX has been in use, or almost, people have been
| complaining that there is no word count feature. Since even abiword has
| that now ;), I thought it was a good idea to implement it.
>
| Using DocIterator, it is really straightforw
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> If each installed version had a different PACKAGE (which can be
Angus> specified explicitly at configure-time) then using PACKAGE
Angus> would be identical to the existing scheme.
Yes. I think I created the current scheme at the ti
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephan> Dear LyX developers, today I managed to configure and compile
Stephan> latest 1.3.x lyx from CVS. While testing the resulting binary
Stephan> I detected a minor but serious problem: the lyxlength numbers
Stephan> will be emitted
For as long as LyX has been in use, or almost, people have been
complaining that there is no word count feature. Since even abiword has
that now ;), I thought it was a good idea to implement it.
Using DocIterator, it is really straightforward. One can count words
in the whole document or in a sel
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I was referring to Mandrake. If this is the latest and greatest
Lars> why ship an old compiler.
Well, Mandrakelinux 10.1 was released in october. Since gcc 3.4.2 was
released in september, I guess they decided to play safe. Mor
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Hmm... gcc 3.4.1 is old..
>
| Jean-Marc> I knew this was coming...
>
| Note also that gcc is absolutely not run in this case. You should
| rather complain about the ver
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Why do we search for the system_lyxdir as // Path of
> Angus> binary/../share/name of binary/ but the user_lyxdir as //
> Angus> os::homepath() "/." + PACKAGE
>
> Angus> where PACKAGE is defined in config.h as (here) "lyx-1.3.6cvs".
>
> Angus> Why don't we use
44 matches
Mail list logo
