Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think this should go in branch as well Jurgen.
OK.
Jürgen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:51:24AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Hm... not sure. I've been using the commercial version of Qt for three
years and now in the new job some in-house version from which both the
commercial and the OS versions are build. I think I never used the
OS
Jonathan Vogt wrote:
I got a layout file here, which I can't open either with 1.5.1 or 1.5.x
svn.
It looks like layout2layout is running in an endless loop. Could you create a
bugzilla entry for this please?
In the meantime, if you change
Format 2
to
Format 4
in the layout file, your
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I'm no TeXpert, but I think the logic here is that there is a baseline
for text in each row of the table. Vertical alignment is with
reference to the baseline. So setting middle in the fixed-width
column says that you want the middle of each cell in that column to
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a command not allowed message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
I know, Alfredo reported this already. It should work with the mouse as
a work-around. I cannot reproduce it in Windows but I know the origin of
the
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a command not allowed message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
By the way, do Ctrl-n works for you?
Abdel.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Of course it's a somewhat pathological example and we won't suddenly
compile 7 times faster within 1/146 diskspace when we kick anon
namespaces out. But the direction is clear...
That would be very fine with me but Lars would be displeased I guess...
Using the static
Quoting Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:38:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Aug 27 16:38:29 2007
New Revision: 19834
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19834
Log:
Remove the wide() hack. This simplifies quite a few
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:02:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:38:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Aug 27 16:38:29 2007
New Revision: 19834
URL:
Infact, a few weeks ago, I was told LyX were using unnamed
namespaces instead of statics, so I've got to the usual
TIC++vone.pdf, where it says:
If you put local names in an unnamed namespace, you don’t
need to give them internal linkage by making them static.
C++ deprecates the use of file
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
[...] the new C++ Standard reads in section 7.3.1.1 Unnamed Spaces,
paragraph 2: The use of the static keyword is deprecated when
declaring objects in a namespace scope, the unnamed namespace provides
a superior alternative.
Superior how - is the question. If all
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:33:23AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So anybody who remembers the reasons to use the anon namespace (for
_functions_)? [Rhetorical question...]
I seem to remember that Lars told us that it was a good thing (TM).
However,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:33:31AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Of course it's a somewhat pathological example and we won't suddenly
compile 7 times faster within 1/146 diskspace when we kick anon
namespaces out. But the direction is clear...
That would be very fine
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
Infact, a few weeks ago, I was told LyX were using unnamed
namespaces instead of statics, so I've got to the usual
TIC++vone.pdf, where it says:
If you put local names in an unnamed namespace, you don’t
need to give them
Attached. I'll put this in if people feel that this is the right direction.
Note that character styles still are not enabled by default. It has been my
long standing wish that at least Noun and Emph would replace the similar
named 'font-like' styles.
(What to do with underbar? Underlining is
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:45:15 Helge Hafting wrote:
That's a really stupid argument. Thw word static has too many meanings,
so lets disable some of them ??? The sane thing would be a
clean rename from static to several new keywords - one for each
use. And to keep the existing nice
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 07:35:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added:
lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-ams-withinsection.module
lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-ams.module
lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-std.module
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:34:40PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:45:15 Helge Hafting wrote:
That's a really stupid argument. Thw word static has too many meanings,
so lets disable some of them ??? The sane thing would be a
clean rename from static to several new
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a command not allowed message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
I know, Alfredo reported this already. It should work with the mouse
as a work-around.
Yes, I've got this.
I cannot reproduce it in
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Attached. I'll put this in if people feel that this is the right direction.
Very much so, but you already know how I feel about this.
Note that character styles still are not enabled by default. It has been my
long standing wish that at least Noun and Emph would
José Matos wrote:
Hi Richard,
I have some small (and probably pedantic) questions regarding you work on
modules:
Why are the new files called modules and how they differ from the
current .inc files internally? Are the modules supposed to superseed the
previous .inc files?
The .inc
Jose,
I don't know how much of this you've seen at this point, but here is
where this stands. The work is basically done, except for some lyx2lyx
and the accompanying format change.
Some re-arranging type stuff went in a few days ago. I've just committed
some re-factoring code in
As said. Saw this while testing some lyx2lyx.
Richard
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
New Revision: 19859
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
Log:
We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
* TextMetrics.cpp: CursorOnRow()
Quoting Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- bool cursor_on_row = CursorOnRow(pi, pit, rit, *text_);
-
// If selection is on, the current row signature differs
// from cache, or cursor is inside an inset _on this row_,
Forgot this comment? - Martin
Yes,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:02:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- bool cursor_on_row = CursorOnRow(pi, pit, rit, *text_);
-
// If selection is on, the current row signature differs
// from cache, or cursor is
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
New Revision: 19859
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
Log:
We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
* TextMetrics.cpp: CursorOnRow()
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
New Revision: 19859
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
Log:
We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
* TextMetrics.cpp:
Hi,
one reason is bug #4178:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4178
Regards,
Michael
Jürgen, all,
here comes a new edition of the 1.5.x patch candidate list. Patches
recommended by Abdel are marked with !.
Michael
PS: I will continue sending this list by email. It forces me (and you)
to stay active. Wiki pages are just to easy to ignore :-)
?
Abdel,
Know you're working on the drawing stuff, and not trying to make your
life more difficult...rather, trying to help.
Open a document, put the cursor at the beginning of a word in the middle
of a sentence, hit space (which you're not allowed to do). The line
becomes oddly darker. This
Michael Gerz wrote:
? http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19331 - Deal with a UI bug
Jurgen suggested this one could wait.
rh
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4170
The patch fixes the bug. Please test. We were returning early.
I think it's right to clear the AutosaveFile here even if the buffer
wasn't unnamed, but if not please let me know.
Richard
--
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4170
The patch fixes the bug. Please test.
I tested this and it works as expected.
regards Uwe
In this whole lengthy diatribe, nobody seems to mention the words
good programming practice;
perhaps it died with C++? Programing standards are not usually the
provence of good programming practice, no more than car technical
manuals provide instruction on good driving practice.
The only
On 8/24/07, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here is another one with some minor adjustments.
I will only look into this next Monday. :-(
I will be happy to spend more time with my kids this weekend, so take
your time. :-)
Forgotten?
Bo
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
New Revision: 19859
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
Log:
We are not
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I think this should go in branch as well Jurgen.
OK.
Jürgen
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:51:24AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Hm... not sure. I've been using the commercial version of Qt for three
years and now in the new job some in-house version from which both the
commercial and the OS versions are build. I think I never used the
OS
Jonathan Vogt wrote:
> I got a layout file here, which I can't open either with 1.5.1 or 1.5.x
> svn.
It looks like layout2layout is running in an endless loop. Could you create a
bugzilla entry for this please?
In the meantime, if you change
Format 2
to
Format 4
in the layout file, your
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I'm no TeXpert, but I think the logic here is that there is a baseline
for text in each row of the table. Vertical alignment is with
reference to the baseline. So setting "middle" in the fixed-width
column says that you want the middle of each cell in that column to
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a "command not allowed" message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
I know, Alfredo reported this already. It should work with the mouse as
a work-around. I cannot reproduce it in Windows but I know the origin of
the
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a "command not allowed" message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
By the way, do Ctrl-n works for you?
Abdel.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Of course it's a somewhat pathological example and we won't suddenly
compile 7 times faster within 1/146 diskspace when we kick anon
namespaces out. But the direction is clear...
That would be very fine with me but Lars would be displeased I guess...
Using the static
Quoting Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:38:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: younes
> > Date: Mon Aug 27 16:38:29 2007
> > New Revision: 19834
> >
> > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19834
> > Log:
> > Remove the wide() hack. This simplifies
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:02:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:38:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Author: younes
> > > Date: Mon Aug 27 16:38:29 2007
> > > New Revision: 19834
> > >
> > > URL:
Infact, a few weeks ago, I was told LyX were using unnamed
namespaces instead of statics, so I've got to the usual
TIC++vone.pdf, where it says:
"If you put local names in an unnamed namespace, you don’t
need to give them internal linkage by making them static.
C++ deprecates the use of file
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
[...] the new C++ Standard reads in section 7.3.1.1 Unnamed Spaces,
paragraph 2: "The use of the static keyword is deprecated when
declaring objects in a namespace scope, the unnamed namespace provides
a superior alternative."
Superior how - is the question. If all
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:33:23AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So anybody who remembers the reasons to use the anon namespace (for
> > _functions_)? [Rhetorical question...]
>
> I seem to remember that Lars told us that it was "a good thing" (TM).
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:33:31AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >Of course it's a somewhat pathological example and we won't suddenly
> >compile 7 times faster within 1/146 diskspace when we kick anon
> >namespaces out. But the direction is clear...
>
> That would be
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:45:57PM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Infact, a few weeks ago, I was told LyX were using unnamed
> namespaces instead of statics, so I've got to the usual
> TIC++vone.pdf, where it says:
>
> "If you put local names in an unnamed namespace, you don’t
> need to give
Attached. I'll put this in if people feel that this is the right direction.
Note that character styles still are not enabled by default. It has been my
long standing wish that at least Noun and Emph would replace the similar
named 'font-like' styles.
(What to do with underbar? Underlining is
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:45:15 Helge Hafting wrote:
> That's a really stupid argument. Thw word "static" has too many meanings,
> so lets disable some of them ??? The sane thing would be a
> clean rename from "static" to several new keywords - one for each
> use. And to keep the existing
On Tuesday 28 August 2007 07:35:43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Added:
>
>
lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-ams-withinsection.module
>lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-ams.module
> lyx-devel/branches/personal/rgheck/lib/layouts/theorems-std.module
>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:34:40PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 August 2007 15:45:15 Helge Hafting wrote:
> > That's a really stupid argument. Thw word "static" has too many meanings,
> > so lets disable some of them ??? The sane thing would be a
> > clean rename from "static" to
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
I'm getting a "command not allowed" message when trying to use
Alt-whatever to access the menu with no buffer open.
I know, Alfredo reported this already. It should work with the mouse
as a work-around.
Yes, I've got this.
I cannot reproduce it
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Attached. I'll put this in if people feel that this is the right direction.
Very much so, but you already know how I feel about this.
Note that character styles still are not enabled by default. It has been my
long standing wish that at least Noun and Emph would
José Matos wrote:
Hi Richard,
I have some small (and probably pedantic) questions regarding you work on
modules:
Why are the new files called modules and how they differ from the
current .inc files internally? Are the modules supposed to superseed the
previous .inc files?
The .inc
Jose,
I don't know how much of this you've seen at this point, but here is
where this stands. The work is basically done, except for some lyx2lyx
and the accompanying format change.
Some re-arranging type stuff went in a few days ago. I've just committed
some re-factoring code in
As said. Saw this while testing some lyx2lyx.
Richard
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==
Get my public
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
> New Revision: 19859
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
> Log:
> We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
>
> * TextMetrics.cpp:
Quoting Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - bool cursor_on_row = CursorOnRow(pi, pit, rit, *text_);
> > -
> > // If selection is on, the current row signature differs
> > // from cache, or cursor is inside an inset _on this row_,
>
> Forgot this comment? -
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 09:02:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > - bool cursor_on_row = CursorOnRow(pi, pit, rit, *text_);
> > > -
> > > // If selection is on, the current row signature differs
> > > // from
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
> New Revision: 19859
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
> Log:
> We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
>
> * TextMetrics.cpp:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
New Revision: 19859
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
Log:
We are not forced to redraw the row each time the cursor is moved.
* TextMetrics.cpp:
Hi,
one reason is bug #4178:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4178
Regards,
Michael
Jürgen, all,
here comes a new edition of the 1.5.x patch candidate list. Patches
recommended by Abdel are marked with "!".
Michael
PS: I will continue sending this list by email. It forces me (and you)
to stay active. Wiki pages are just to easy to ignore :-)
?
Abdel,
Know you're working on the drawing stuff, and not trying to make your
life more difficult...rather, trying to help.
Open a document, put the cursor at the beginning of a word in the middle
of a sentence, hit space (which you're not allowed to do). The line
becomes oddly darker. This
Michael Gerz wrote:
? http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19331 - Deal with a UI bug
Jurgen suggested this one could wait.
rh
--
==
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4170
The patch fixes the bug. Please test. We were returning early.
I think it's right to clear the AutosaveFile here even if the buffer
wasn't unnamed, but if not please let me know.
Richard
--
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4170
>
> The patch fixes the bug. Please test.
I tested this and it works as expected.
regards Uwe
In this whole lengthy diatribe, nobody seems to mention the words
"good programming practice";
perhaps it died with C++? Programing standards are not usually the
provence of "good programming practice", no more than car technical
manuals provide instruction on good driving practice.
The
On 8/24/07, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > And here is another one with some minor adjustments.
> >
> > I will only look into this next Monday. :-(
>
> I will be happy to spend more time with my kids this weekend, so take
> your time. :-)
Forgotten?
Bo
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:53:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 04:39:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>Author: younes
> >>Date: Tue Aug 28 18:39:46 2007
> >>New Revision: 19859
> >>
> >>URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/19859
74 matches
Mail list logo
