I don't recall seeing any mention of LaTeX3 on either developers or
users lists over the decade I've been following them. I "discovered"
LaTeX3 last year and was struck by how much easier it is to code in TeX
using the expl3 language of LaTeX3 rather than directly in TeX/LaTeX2e,
and also by th
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:00:19 +0100
From: Øyvind Sørbye
I am working on making a silent install/uninstall package of Lyx for our
organization. There is an annoying error in the uninstaller, when running
it, it removes _all_ icons under "C:\programdata\microsoft\windows\Start
Menu\Progr
Hy LyXers,
after Jürgen finished the font handling for LyX 2.1 I added all supported font packages to
chkconfig.ltx in order to install automatically all possible fonts on Windows. The idea was to
provide full-featured LyX so that you can go offline after the installation of LyX and work withou
So, Stephan has squashed the last of the bugs affecting the 2.0.7
release on OSX, so we are ready to package 2.0.7.1 and release that. The
question is how to do this on git. Other commits have been made to 2.0.x
since then, so I cannot just tag off that branch.
Here's what I think I can do.
Hi,
i'm pushing citations via pipe to lyx. In the lyx document i'm using
jurabib because of its flexible citation styles.
Now, when i'm inserting a citation via the lyx-menu i can select
different citation styles. But when the citation was pushed into the
document via pipe it is not possible
29/01/2014 09:59, Scott Kostyshak:
The conversion of image formats is already done because of LaTeX
(pdflatex) or at least it happens when I do Export > LaTeX
(pdflatex). I imagine the same is true for external material, although
I did not test. So to me it seems like latex=pdflatex belongs in t
On Jan 29, 2014, at 09:06 , Stephan Witt wrote:
> I've made a new disk image with a hopefully fixed LyX 2.0.7 and put it here:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.7-1%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.7-1%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig
>
> It's na
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-01-29 Scott Kostyshak
>
>> So in this case myfancyoutputformat would be used instead of LaTeX
>> (pdflatex)? If so, I now see why latex=pdflatex is needed.
>> What would be a use case for using myfancyoutputformat over LaTeX
>> (pdf
2014-01-29 Scott Kostyshak
> So in this case myfancyoutputformat would be used instead of LaTeX
> (pdflatex)? If so, I now see why latex=pdflatex is needed.
> What would be a use case for using myfancyoutputformat over LaTeX
> (pdflatex)? The only advantage I see would be control over the file
> f
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>
>> Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from
>> libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the
>> overhead of running an external command anyway.
>>
>> Wha
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> 2014-01-29 Scott Kostyshak
>
>> But aren't those already taken into account because of the "from" part
>> of a converter? For example, if it's from LaTeX (pdflatex) then the
>> output from LyX should already be set to pdflatex. But I gue
Le 29/01/14 06:01, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Makes sense. I was a little worried about performance from
libScriptSearch but I guess it is not an issue compared to the
overhead of running an external command anyway.
What about the substitutions of the other converter variables? Should
they also a
2014-01-29 Scott Kostyshak
> But aren't those already taken into account because of the "from" part
> of a converter? For example, if it's from LaTeX (pdflatex) then the
> output from LyX should already be set to pdflatex. But I guess there
> could be differences after pdflatex is run, such as how
13 matches
Mail list logo