Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 24/01/2016 11:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : Thanks, I tested the patch and it works well. The new method GuiPainter::path method seems safe because it is very similar to other ones in GuiPainter. The other changes look ok, as for the symbol choice Richard seemed positive about it. Please

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

On 02/02/16 09:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 01/02/2016 20:13, pdv a écrit : On 01/02/16 15:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What version of Mac OS X is that? I had to add -std=c++11 to CPPFLAGS because the clang preprocessor needs it to select the proper libc++ stuff. Without it some

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

On 02/02/16 09:19, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 01.02.2016 um 21:39 schrieb pdv : On 01/02/16 15:54, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 01.02.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 30/01/2016 09:55, pdv a écrit : Hi, Build under OS X fails with: CXX

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

Le 24/01/2016 23:08, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 06:36:03PM -0500, Guillaume Munch wrote: Maybe we can go with the improvements you already made for beta, and commit this particular patch to master

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 25/01/2016 00:32, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 25.01.2016 um 00:28 schrieb Guillaume Munch: > Georg's commit indeed fixed the alignment, but not the width of the column, which sometimes makes it hard to see that the first line is left-aligned and the last one right-aligned. So you are saying

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Am 02.02.2016 um 21:05 schrieb pdv : > > On 02/02/16 09:19, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 01.02.2016 um 21:39 schrieb pdv : >>> >>> On 01/02/16 15:54, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 01.02.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :

Re: Request for DIFFERENT reset button in LyX: Text Style window.

On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 10:49:29AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/02/2016 02:32 PM, Michael Cwikel wrote: > > > > Dear Developers: > > > > I currently use LyX 2.4.1 under Windows 8.1. > > > > Please consider developing the following feature: > > > > A new reset button in the LyX: Text Style

Re: Proposal for releasing beta quickly

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:07:52PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 01.02.2016 um 20:49 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >I propose that we resolve the situation in master as soon as possible by > >reverting the commit that is under discussion. > > I don't understand the problem. A fix is in AND it

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Le 25/01/2016 23:49, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 25.01.2016 um 07:21 schrieb Stephan Witt: I cannot apply your patch. I get the 2 attached errors and the TortoiseGit crashes. It tells me that it cannot find the revision 12e871a for InsetMathGrid.cpp. And indeed this revsion does not exists.

Re: Proposal for releasing beta quickly

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 12:19:47PM +, José Matos wrote: > On Monday, February 01, 2016 10:07:52 PM Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Wasn't it our goal in the past to keep the fileformat stable with the > > first beta release? > > I do not remember that. > > As I wrote before the last possible moment

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Am 02.02.2016 um 19:31 schrieb Georg Baum: The particular case we are discussing is a good example for both items: convert_ACM_siggraph() in lyx2lyx does currently delete document contents without telling the user It told the user with a red note at the beginning of the document. It also

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

Am 02.02.2016 um 22:02 schrieb Guillaume Munch: I am sceptical, since the other patches which made your software crash were based against master. You can try again with the same diff since InsetMathGrid.cpp with hash 12e871a... is now in master. I tried your patch again and now it applied

Re: Proposal for releasing beta quickly

Am 02.02.2016 um 23:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The final 2.2.0 release will be out sooner if you revert and we release beta as soon as possible, instead of waiting until we come to an agreement and then releasing beta. I reverted it now. Of course I want to have JMarc's fix for the table

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Why do you want to revert a fix for a real problem? I fixed it the way > we always did in the past. If it is more important for you to be > bureaucratically correct than fixing issues, be it. I am too old for this. My motivation for insisting that the +1 rule is followed is

Re: Proposal for releasing beta quickly

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:11:56AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 02.02.2016 um 23:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>Of course I want to have JMarc's fix for the table crash in before beta and > >>my patch for the box issue is in my opinion safe as well. > > What is your decision here? JMarc's

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Le 01/02/2016 20:13, pdv a écrit : On 01/02/16 15:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What version of Mac OS X is that? I had to add -std=c++11 to CPPFLAGS because the clang preprocessor needs it to select the proper libc++ stuff. Without it some autoconf tests would fail. This is with OS X

Re: clang doesn't like -std=c++11 for Objective C files

Am 01.02.2016 um 21:39 schrieb pdv : > > On 01/02/16 15:54, Stephan Witt wrote: >> Am 01.02.2016 um 15:49 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >>> >>> Le 30/01/2016 09:55, pdv a écrit : Hi, Build under OS X fails with: CXX

Re: ACM-siggraph failing with newest class/style files

Le 01/02/2016 22:01, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Why do you want to revert a fix for a real problem? I fixed it the way we always did in the past. If it is more important for you to be bureaucratically correct than fixing issues, be it. I am too old for this. I volunteered to improve the situation

Re: Proposal for releasing beta quickly

On Monday, February 01, 2016 10:07:52 PM Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Wasn't it our goal in the past to keep the fileformat stable with the > first beta release? I do not remember that. As I wrote before the last possible moment (within reasonable limits) for the file format change is the x.y.0 release.