Re: beta2?

Am 11.02.2016 um 21:40 schrieb Georg Baum : > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> Should we do a quick beta2 release? If so, is everything set on master >> so we just need to tag and tar it? Or is something else missing? > > The tar ball must be generated after

Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

Hi all: I use in command line psbook, psnup, psselect to print books or pamphlets and need the printer when printing individual chapters or sections. This I can make in 2.1.4, but no in 2.2.0beta1. How I can get these? Thanks advanced Miguel

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Buenas Noticias wrote: > Hi all: > > I use in command line psbook, psnup, psselect to print books or pamphlets > and need the printer when printing individual chapters or sections. This I > can make in 2.1.4, but no in 2.2.0beta1. How I can

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/02/2016 19:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> index ff4068a..fae083f 100644 >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ The \SpecialChar LyX >> \end_layout >> >>

beta2?

Should we do a quick beta2 release? If so, is everything set on master so we just need to tag and tar it? Or is something else missing? From what I understand, the situation is the following: It is not possible to compile LyX 2.2.0beta1 for Windows from the tar ball. In order to add files to the

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 09/02/2016 19:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> index ff4068a..fae083f 100644 > >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >>

Re: 2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

Jürgen Lange wrote: > Hello, > thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1. > Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The > format is PDF (XeTeX). > The error-message is: > Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden. > Einige Zeichen Ihres

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:49:59PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > > > > > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P > > > > diff: > > --- runtime.output 2016-02-10

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Hi Scott, > > the tarball is incomplete. There are several 3rdparty files missing: Thank you very much for building from the tar ball! The procedure did its job: It found out that we did some mistakes when adding files

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf >> Author: Guillaume Munch >> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 >> >> New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs >> >> Simply

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:53:34PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf > >> Author: Guillaume Munch > >> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100

2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

Hello, thank you very much for 2.2.0 beta 1. Compiling one of my documents does not work anymore in 2.2.0 beta 1. The format is PDF (XeTeX). The error-message is: Kann keinen Latex Befehl für das Zeichen ḫ (Code-Punkt 0x1e2b) finden. Einige Zeichen Ihres Dokuments sind mit der gewählten

2.2.0 beta 1: Xetex not working

The PDF Producer changed from Xetex 0.2 in 2.1.4. to MikTex-xdvipdfmx (20150315) in 2.2.0beta1.

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: update language files

Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 um 23:29:55, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > diff --git a/development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/slovak.nsh > b/development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/slovak.nsh > index 64a2879..abfef3e 100644 > ---

Please re-generate po/pt_BR.gmo from po/pt_BR.po in lyxgit

I have submitted some updates for the Brazilian Portuguese translation and I'd like to see those make it in 2.2.0. Best regards, Georger

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. >> > >> > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P >> >> diff: >> --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800 >> +++ Length 2015-07-22

Re: beta2?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Should we do a quick beta2 release? If so, is everything set on master > so we just need to tag and tar it? Or is something else missing? The tar ball must be generated after ff9ba203ff6d, otherwise it would miss the files again. Comparing the complete 3rdparty

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: update language files

Am 12.02.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Kornel Benko: -#-*-coding: windows-1250;-*- May I ask, why did you remove this line? This should not happen. I reverted this now. thanks and regards Uwe

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

Le 11/02/2016 02:40, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : On 11/02/2016 1:28 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: I built an installer for beta 1 and uploaded it: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-1/ regards Uwe I've downloaded and installed this on a windows 7 machine. Initial impressions are good. In particular,

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

Le 24/01/2016 15:53, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: Looks like http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21541a07/lyxgit and http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/a25c946b/lyxgit have to be backported as well. OK. The autoconf version (a25c946b) has already been

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 um 18:07:06, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 24/01/2016 15:53, Richard Heck a écrit : > > On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > >> Looks like http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21541a07/lyxgit and > >>