Le 21/02/2016 20:52, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I also don't see a reason why this cannot be done now since otherwise users of
than languages would have to wait 2 more years until LyX 2.3.
I agree that this is unfortunate. But the same
Le 21/02/2016 08:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype
support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for
params) which would result into simple \usepackage[...]{microtype} in header?
Is there any opposition to
Dear all,
We still want to leave beta2 out there for some time to get more
feedback before moving to an RC, but I would like to get a feeling for
what issues others view as critical. Which issues do you view as
blockers?
We have 11 trac tickets with a 2.2.0 milestone. Any help with reducing
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 02:53:29AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 18.02.2016 um 05:04 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >Do we view them as critical for 2.2.0?
>
> The docs would look better if this would be fixed but this can be fixed any
> time. So I would say postpone to 2.2.x.
OK thanks for the
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:06:14PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> While advertising LyX to a business colleague I was asked if it can handle
> Macedonian. I was surprised that we don't support it yet and had a closer
> look.
I am surprised too, given the other languages that LyX already supports.
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lyx.org> writes:
>
> There is a link to 2.2.0-latest in the first section, along with a link
> to new features in 2.2.0. You should move it to the roadmap section, and
> merge it with what you wrote.
Sure, I overlooked this, it's done. Thanks for the hint.
--
Le 21/02/16 19:24, Jean-Pierre Chrétien a écrit :
Hello,
In the page on the subject line, I read
No release plans yet.
under the development version item.
As beta is out, I modified the page accordingly:
http://www.lyx.org/RoadMap
Hello Jean-Pierre,
There is a link to 2.2.0-latest in the
Hello,
In the page on the subject line, I read
No release plans yet.
under the development version item.
As beta is out, I modified the page accordingly:
http://www.lyx.org/RoadMap
I hope this is what expected.
--
Jean-Pierre
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:00:05PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> On 02/21/2016 10:59 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> >I'd say go ahead. I'm almost certain this is not the right way to fix
> >the bug.
>
> Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9979
>
> Do we need one for the first problem, as a reminder
While advertising LyX to a business colleague I was asked if it can
handle Macedonian. I was surprised that we don't support it yet and had
a closer look.
In fact Macedonian and Bosnian are official languages and babel supports
them for years (also in TeXLive).
I also encountered that
On 02/21/2016 10:59 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
I'd say go ahead. I'm almost certain this is not the right way to fix
the bug.
Done: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9979
Do we need one for the first problem, as a reminder to commit?
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:06:19PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Februar 2016 um 23:39:00, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> > Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Uwe still gets the following errors from the tar I sent to him:
> >
> >
Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> >> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex,
> >> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing lualatex/bibtex to
> >> misbehave.
>
>
On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex,
>> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing lualatex/bibtex to
>> misbehave.
>> 1.) bibtex does not like the string 'jacsat' (biblioExample.bib:61,
>> entry Arduengo1994).
On 02/21/2016 10:35 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote:
> On 02/20/2016 11:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> One solution would be to have Buffer::collectChildren make sure the
>> Buffers exist.
>
> I can confirm that your patch fixes the problem. Thanks, Richard!
>
> Scott, do you still want me to file the bug
On 02/20/2016 11:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
One solution would be to have Buffer::collectChildren make sure the
Buffers exist.
I can confirm that your patch fixes the problem. Thanks, Richard!
Scott, do you still want me to file the bug report?
Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 13:24:02, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 20:52:23, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> >
> > OTOH, I am pretty sure this has something to do with some of the used
> > LaTeX packages not beeing fit for Xe/LuaTeX.
Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 20:52:23, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> OTOH, I am pretty sure this has something to do with some of the used
> LaTeX packages not beeing fit for Xe/LuaTeX. Maybe you can bisect or we
> need to compare the complete list of included packages and
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Attached is the patch which is applicable against current master.
Slightly updated patch. P
diff --git a/development/FORMAT b/development/FORMAT
index 1d24d92..406f076 100644
--- a/development/FORMAT
+++ b/development/FORMAT
@@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ adjustments are made to tex2lyx
Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-02-19, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > LaTeX experts,
>
> > is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype
> > support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for
> > params) which would result into simple
20 matches
Mail list logo