Re: System for continuous integration (CI) of LyX master branch, compiled on Ubuntu

On 24 January 2017 at 10:25, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > The job that builds with autotools and qt4 fails during 'make distclean' > > within 'make distcheck'. > > Here's a link to the console output: > > I looked into the issue and it is caused by the fact that you use new > autotools

Re: #10481: Hardening LyX against potential misuse

On 22/01/2017 05:13, Scott Kostyshak wrote: But I still think that the dialog should be an error, not a warning. There is 0% chance that the export was correct. To me this suggests an error. Tommaso, what are your thoughts? agree, see [eaa3ddaf/lyxgit]. Also, highlighted that it's a

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

Le 24/01/2017 à 23:57, Richard Heck a écrit : I agree with Enrico that we should revert to the previous behavior. What we could also do, though, is provide SOME easy way (a shortcut?) for people to insert \textemdash, if that is what they want to do. Alternatively (yes, I know it is a terrible

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On 01/24/2017 05:50 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:31:11PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 24/01/2017 à 23:07, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : >>> The first two that come to mind are xypic and tikz. As regards xypic, >>> in lyx 2.1 you could write a code fragment,

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:31:11PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/01/2017 à 23:07, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > The first two that come to mind are xypic and tikz. As regards xypic, > > in lyx 2.1 you could write a code fragment, select it and then hit > > Ctrl-M to have it nicely

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

Le 24/01/2017 à 23:07, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : The first two that come to mind are xypic and tikz. As regards xypic, in lyx 2.1 you could write a code fragment, select it and then hit Ctrl-M to have it nicely previewed. Now no more. You mean that hitting Ctrl-M before writing the code

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

Enrico Forestieri wrote: > The first two that come to mind are xypic and tikz. As regards xypic, > in lyx 2.1 you could write a code fragment, select it and then hit > Ctrl-M to have it nicely previewed. Now no more. :(

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:35:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 24/01/2017 à 21:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : > > But packages that expect to see two hyphens instead of \textendash > > are not broken... > > Out of curiosity: what packages are these? The first two that come to mind

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

Le 24/01/2017 à 21:11, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : But packages that expect to see two hyphens instead of \textendash are not broken... Out of curiosity: what packages are these? JMarc

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:00:02PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2017-01-24, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:14:39PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > >> Below is an incomplete patch (see FIXME). > >> Could someone with more C++ knowledge complete and test, please? > > >

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On 2017-01-24, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:14:39PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> Below is an incomplete patch (see FIXME). >> Could someone with more C++ knowledge complete and test, please? > This would be a step forward. However, I am more radical and would like >

Re: System for continuous integration (CI) of LyX master branch, compiled on Ubuntu

Le 24/01/2017 à 10:25, Pavel Sanda a écrit : which has to obviously fail because we deleted tests/.deps already. JMarc, do you have idea about the fix? I suspect this is related to our SUBDIRS variable SUBDIRS = support frontends . $(CLIENT) tex2lyx I am not sure why . is added explicitly

Re: EmDash Problems (patch)

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:14:39PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > Below is an incomplete patch (see FIXME). > Could someone with more C++ knowledge complete and test, please? This would be a step forward. However, I am more radical and would like that the automatic transformation of -- and ---

Re: System for continuous integration (CI) of LyX master branch, compiled on Ubuntu

Christian Ridderström wrote: > > > Yes, it will, hopefully we will get this fixed within next few days. > > > > distcheck works for me right now. > > > > The job that builds with autotools and qt4 fails during 'make distclean' > within 'make distcheck'. > Here's a link to the console output: I

Re: Empty source package when building with CMake?

Am Montag, 23. Januar 2017 um 23:15:46, schrieb Christian Ridderström > Hi, > > When building LyX using CMake (and Qt5), the resulting source packages (?) > are empty, which seems wrong to me... See e.g. the "workspace" of this job: > >