Hi Brian,
I use Lyx at my workplace. I may not quote my company (my contract
forbids it), but let's say we write Ada software to control big
hardware.
Brian Proffitt wrote:
> Regarding LyX overall, what are some of the features you think users will
> appreciate the most when they use this applic
John Levon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 03:27:53PM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> > One problem with XML is that a full parser carries a pretty big
> > foot-print along with it, and it also introduces Yet Another
> > Dependency. Finally, no good free C++ XML parsers are really
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
> Perhaps the xml writer should be written first? and then the xml
> parser could be created/implemented later?
>
A writer is already available and I test it against the reader to check
that I am not making too many mistakes. But as you suggest I started
with the wr
Hello,
I would like to work on XML support for LyX again. I had reached a point
where I could write and read files before my long holidays . I still
need to work a lot on the mathed part since it uses specific code to
read its data.
But first, I need to sync back with LyX development, should I u
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Because it is not finished yet.
>
So, what is your advice, should I work with NEW_INSETS defined or
without it ? I prefer to work with NEW_INSETS since the code is nicer,
but I am ready to work on older code to make something that works.
Also, is there a list
Hello,
I have currently reached the point where I can read back XML-Lyx data
(fonts, tables and a few simple things).
But it seems that there are many things I do not understand :
- why is NEW_INSETS not the default ?
- when I define NEW_INSETS, I cannot create frames anymore. This is
trouble
Hello,
As I thought the original code by Juergen was also wrong it should be
as follows (I do the diff by hand, sorry):
os << "\n\n";
+"/>\n\n";
You could also write :
+ ">\n\n";
Which is equivalent but somewhat more verbose.
Sincerely,
P.O. Gaillar
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option
> > stuff couldn't that be handled with something like ,
> > as this seems much nicer too me!
>
This is precisely why this output is handled by a small function that I
can redefine at will.
> I think Pi
Hello,
Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX
copy.
This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses
XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so
please bear with the poor formatting). I have added XMLWrite methods to
classes tha
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Gaillard Pierre-Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | XMLAttributes is a subclass of map that defines a method
> | "set(string name, int value)".
>
> By adding a [] operator you can at least make things a bi
Hello,
I would need to add a directory inside src :
xml
And inside this directory :
XMLSAXHandler.h
XMLSAXPrettifier.h
XMLSAXPrettifier.C
I have made a simple Makefile.am by adapting xtl/Makefile.am. Then I ran
automake but the result is strange (make does nothing). It seems that I
should buil
Hello,
I noticed that the change was both backward and forward compatible (I
did not need to change the methods for reading) so I did it.
I have added 2 local methods to write attributes because using "<<"
would have been awkward : there would have been so many "\"" all around.
I believe it wou
Hello,
After looking at the changebar package I decided the chbar.sh was not OK
(it does not spot differences
in included eps figures, has some problems with tables and cross-layout
differences and works on Latex files while working on Lyx files would be
nicer).
So I wrote a Python script operati
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> Dear LyX developers,
>
> 5) One of the major advantages of Microsoft Word currently often
> quoted in my environment is the group features. I.e. if I send a word
> document to a colleague it is possible for him to make changes, and if
> he sends it back, I see the chang
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
> | Why not with good old "%"? I do not see the need for the comment
> | environment to write "remember to re-read this section later" or some
> | other stuff notes are for. This should be configurable in some way
> | (two sorts of comments?). There could also be a ch
15 matches
Mail list logo
