Re: first step of merging the Win installers

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4de9a690.2020...@web.de... - I used the custom LaTeX installer page from my installer, only because this is already translated to 22 languages. The page design is a matter of taste, so we can also use yours if you prefer it for a certain reason.

Re: first step of merging the Win installers

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4de9a690.2020...@web.de... - I used the custom LaTeX installer page from my installer, only because this is already translated to 22 languages. The page design is a matter of taste, so we can also use yours if you prefer it for a certain

Re: first step of merging the Win installers

Hi Uwe, Below are my comments/concerns. I guess in the future it's better to have a little discussion on the devel list first so things don't have to be reverted. Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dd9dfbf.2080...@web.de... - you installed LyX's sty-files always to MiKTeX's

Re: first step of merging the Win installers

Hi Uwe, Below are my comments/concerns. I guess in the future it's better to have a little discussion on the devel list first so things don't have to be reverted. "Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dd9dfbf.2080...@web.de... > - you installed LyX's sty-files always to

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote in message news:4dd58dae.5040...@gmx.net... Yes, I see. Only when the entry is also set in the cache the gui shows the correct value. The problem was, when a option is implicitly set, like HUNSPELL when INSTALL is set, HUNSPELL would be still ON even

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4dd58dae.5040...@gmx.net... > Yes, I see. Only when the entry is also set in the cache the gui shows the > correct value. > The problem was, when a option is implicitly set, like HUNSPELL when > INSTALL is set, > HUNSPELL would be still

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dd51e0b.3010...@web.de... It is the same, but doesn't work, neither in trunk nor branch. I have to set it manually. Perhaps because it is only set on Win32, but I am on Win64. IIRC it does work but it doesn't show in the CMake UI. Joost

Re: still not possible to compile LyX 2.0.x with CMake

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dd51e0b.3010...@web.de... > It is the same, but doesn't work, neither in trunk nor branch. I have to > set it manually. > Perhaps because it is only set on Win32, but I am on Win64. IIRC it does work but it doesn't show in the CMake UI.

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools -Preferences-Path, there was the path to C:\Program Files\LyX16\python which didn't

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools -Preferences-Path, there was the path to C:\Program Files\LyX16\python which didn't

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... > The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the > preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools > ->Preferences->Path, there was the path to > C:\Program Files\LyX16\python

Re: [HELP] Windows 7, 64 bit Bug

"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4dd16a18.1080...@lyx.org... > The reason was that the installer configured LyX using the > preferences of LyX 1.6. In particular this meant that in Tools > ->Preferences->Path, there was the path to > C:\Program Files\LyX16\python

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dcebf92.8010...@web.de... I'm using Joost#s dependency package for MSVC 2010. Any ideas? Did you follow the instructions in INSTALL.Win32? Joost

Re: How to compile LyX with MSVC 2010?

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcebf92.8010...@web.de... > I'm using Joost#s dependency package for MSVC 2010. > > Any ideas? Did you follow the instructions in INSTALL.Win32? Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4dcd44ce.6090...@lyx.org... I'd have to understand what the actual patch is. I did not find it at first glance in the zip file. The subdirectories in the zip file contain the patches. There are quite a lot of them. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" wrote in message news:4dcd44ce.6090...@lyx.org... > I'd have to understand what the actual patch is. I did not find it at > first glance in the zip file. The subdirectories in the zip file contain the patches. There are quite a lot of them. Joost

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Peter Kümmel syntheti...@gmx.net wrote in message news:4dcb63e3.6070...@gmx.net... Joost, how do you compile libintl? With Mingw or does it work with msvc? Couldn't we use the libintl shipped with lyx? libintl is also compiled with MSVC 2010. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

On 05/12/2011 10:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Could we in general depend on gnome dependencies instead of ours? AFAIK those binaries are all based on MinGW. We use MSVC. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4dcb8b0d.6090...@lyx.org... AFAIK Joost maintains such a dll. Joost could you please update the intl directory with whatever fixes you have? AFAIK2 the gettext developpers have dropped msvc support a long time ago. Yes there's no MSVC

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Peter Kümmel" wrote in message news:4dcb63e3.6070...@gmx.net... Joost, how do you compile libintl? With Mingw or does it work with msvc? Couldn't we use the libintl shipped with lyx? libintl is also compiled with MSVC 2010. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

> On 05/12/2011 10:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could we in general depend on gnome dependencies instead of ours? AFAIK those binaries are all based on MinGW. We use MSVC. Joost

Re: Directory cleanup

"Abdelrazak Younes" wrote in message news:4dcb8b0d.6090...@lyx.org... > AFAIK Joost maintains such a dll. Joost could you please update the intl > directory with whatever fixes you have? > AFAIK2 the gettext developpers have dropped msvc support a long time ago. Yes there's no

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dcb1094.2020...@web.de... For multi-user installations it's also impossible to download them directly to the program files because of the need for administrator privileges. Sure, a normal user cannot set up things for other users on the PC.

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dcb0acc.20...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? If possible I don't want to switch to MSVC 2010 because I tested it last year and it was unstable. It also requires much more disk space (which

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dcb36a7.4090...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? However, I can successfully compile LyX with the linked hunspell. Hunspell probably works because it's a C library, although now you need

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb1094.2020...@web.de... For multi-user installations it's also impossible to download them directly to the program files because of the need for administrator privileges. Sure, a normal user cannot set up things for other users on the

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb0acc.20...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? If possible I don't want to switch to MSVC 2010 because I tested it last year and it was unstable. It also requires much more disk space

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dcb36a7.4090...@web.de... Why is MSVC 2010 required? What feature do we use that is not in MSVC 2008? However, I can successfully compile LyX with the linked hunspell. Hunspell probably works because it's a C library, although now you need

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... I tried to resolve the known issues in the new 2.0 version of the Metafile 2 EPS converter. Joost fixed this yesterday. I made some more improvements to metafile2eps today. I'll prepare updated installers. 7. It

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... Am 10.05.2011 02:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Seems to be a problem of the MiKTeX repositories: LyX's first run of configure.py runs through without installing any LaTeX-package. That's why I couldn't see in this case no

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc9f3f7.90...@web.de... OK, there was indeed a problem with my MiKTeX installation residues in the registry. now the installation runs through as expected, but there are thing we should improve: a. When LyX is installed together with MiKTeX we

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc9f4fd.9020...@web.de... So - maybe full offline installation wasn't all that convenient, but it was at least possible - please don't cut off this way. We won't cut that of. But note, to have a fully functional LaTeX installation, you at

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc9f19f.3030...@web.de... Btw., can you please send me the hunspell.lib, iconv.lib and intl.lib files? Currently I cannot compile LyX against hunspell for that reason and i can also not use the new versions of intl and iconv you ship with your

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... I tried to resolve the known issues in the new 2.0 version of the Metafile 2 EPS converter. Joost fixed this yesterday. I made some more improvements to metafile2eps today. I'll prepare updated installers. 7.

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9150a.9060...@web.de... Am 10.05.2011 02:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Seems to be a problem of the MiKTeX repositories: LyX's first run of configure.py runs through without installing any LaTeX-package. That's why I couldn't see in this case no

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f3f7.90...@web.de... OK, there was indeed a problem with my MiKTeX installation residues in the registry. now the installation runs through as expected, but there are thing we should improve: a. When LyX is installed together with

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f4fd.9020...@web.de... So - maybe full offline installation wasn't all that convenient, but it was at least possible - please don't cut off this way. We won't cut that of. But note, to have a fully functional LaTeX installation,

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc9f19f.3030...@web.de... Btw., can you please send me the hunspell.lib, iconv.lib and intl.lib files? Currently I cannot compile LyX against hunspell for that reason and i can also not use the new versions of intl and iconv you ship with

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... the last days I tested your new installer. You have done a good job!: the installer code is much more understandable and contains more comments to be able to understand the code. Thanks. As we once agreed, we should

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Jim Oldfield jim_...@yahoo.co.uk wrote in message news:868476.20267...@web29206.mail.ird.yahoo.com... Personally, am I happy to sacrifice 40MB of disk space if it means that uninstalling other programs doesn't suddenly stop LyX from working. This is the Windows way sadly - since there is no

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... 5. The latest version of the metafile2eps printer gives an error message when it is first used: When I compile a LyX file containing a wmf-image, I get the error message that the printer could not be successfully be

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... the last days I tested your new installer. You have done a good job!: the installer code is much more understandable and contains more comments to be able to understand the code. Thanks. As we once agreed, we

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Jim Oldfield" wrote in message news:868476.20267...@web29206.mail.ird.yahoo.com... > Personally, am I happy to sacrifice 40MB of disk space if it means that uninstalling other programs doesn't suddenly stop LyX from working. This is the "Windows way" sadly - since there

Re: merging status of the Windows installer for LyX 2.0

"Uwe Stöhr" wrote in message news:4dc7ddbe.2020...@web.de... 5. The latest version of the metafile2eps printer gives an error message when it is first used: When I compile a LyX file containing a wmf-image, I get the error message that the printer could not be successfully

Re: Trunk is completely frozen for any commits [unfrozen]

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110505061312.ga15...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Joost do you have time to fix (in another words should i wait with announce for the new version)? I was just able to reproduce the problem. Compiling new installers now. Joost

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

At the time I stepped in and added this dataDirectory relative to lyx's system and user directories there was only one path for hunspell available: the one in preferences. This one now is the first one visited. The idea to add the other paths was to incorporate some dictionary download into LyX

Re: Trunk is completely frozen for any commits [unfrozen]

"Pavel Sanda" wrote in message news:20110505061312.ga15...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... Joost do you have time to fix (in another words should i wait with announce for the new version)? I was just able to reproduce the problem. Compiling new installers now. Joost

Re: Dictionaries location for LyX on Linux

At the time I stepped in and added this dataDirectory relative to lyx's system and user directories there was only one path for hunspell available: the one in preferences. This one now is the first one visited. The idea to add the other paths was to incorporate some dictionary download into LyX

Re: Pdf problem

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110413211218.ga8...@sirio.sssup.it... My wild guess is that that pdfview thingie is using DDE commands for opening pdf files. As Adobe changed the servername in Reader X, it does not work anymore. LyX is not the only software which was

Re: Pdf problem

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110413211218.ga8...@sirio.sssup.it... My wild guess is that that pdfview thingie is using DDE commands for opening pdf files. As Adobe changed the servername in Reader X, it does not work anymore. LyX is not the only software which was

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote in message news:banlktinv39cbo6klvortkyfodtymtka...@mail.gmail.com... I've found this bug when I installed Adobe Acrobat X also (when you click to view PDF, the Adobe Acrobat app starts as well but the file is not oppened), but it is not exactly

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

Diego Queiroz queiroz.di...@gmail.com wrote in message news:BANLkTim6fQ-7u+04_zMnOf5Zb2vh1=e...@mail.gmail.com... Here is the screenshot of C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 10.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe. You're talking about Adobe Acrobat, right? Not Adobe Reader? If yes please also send the info of

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

"Diego Queiroz" wrote in message news:banlktinv39cbo6klvortkyfodtymtka...@mail.gmail.com... I've found this bug when I installed Adobe Acrobat X also (when you click to view PDF, the Adobe Acrobat app starts as well but the file is not oppened), but it is not exactly

Re: LyX 2.0 RC2 for Windows

"Diego Queiroz" wrote in message news:BANLkTim6fQ-7u+04_zMnOf5Zb2vh1=e...@mail.gmail.com... Here is the screenshot of C:\Program Files\Adobe\Reader 10.0\Reader\AcroRd32.exe. You're talking about Adobe Acrobat, right? Not Adobe Reader? If yes please also send the info

Re: Package not initialized under Win32 with CMake

veno...@arcadiaclub.com wrote in message news:65388B121D284A0088A95CB71C14A75F@venomobile... OK, sorry :P I was using Qt compiled with MSVC2008 and using MSVC2008. Are you aware that the package of pre-compiled dependencies requires MSVC2010? Joost

Re: "Package" not initialized under Win32 with CMake

wrote in message news:65388B121D284A0088A95CB71C14A75F@venomobile... OK, sorry :P I was using Qt compiled with MSVC2008 and using MSVC2008. Are you aware that the package of pre-compiled dependencies requires MSVC2010? Joost

Re: r38036 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake

Kornel kor...@lyx.org wrote in message news:201103250733.23097.kor...@lyx.org... Why everything instead of adding only *.R? lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib lyx2lyx *.py .) +lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib scripts *.R .) Kornel Yes that's also fine. Joost

Re: Final round for UI changes

Edwin Leuven e.leu...@gmail.com wrote in message news:AANLkTi=+t2HRjX4oZCoozDFo760_Mo0uVPZ4j5C_x=k...@mail.gmail.com... i guess only the new toolbar layout is left... Yes. I did upload the new toolbar (with optional classic toolbars in addition), but Enrico reverted this. I'm not sure why.

Re: Final round for UI changes

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110324030315.ga29...@sirio.sssup.it... Here is another possible set of icons to be considered. I just noticed the last minute work on the new liber icon set. Perhaps we should delete the oxygen and old sets so only one style of icons

Re: Final round for UI changes

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325144230.gj29...@sirio.sssup.it... Because it was broken. Apart from artifacts in the upper left corner, after starting LyX with no document open, the toolbars where not responding when clicked. That's probably because your session

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it... On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote: Why did you revert this? What was broken? See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive and only through

Re: Error in clean_dvi.py in Lyx 2.0 RC1

Ola Ringdahl ringd...@cs.umu.se wrote in message news:4d8c95d6.7080...@cs.umu.se... There seems to be an error in clean_dvi.py in the windows version of Lyx 2.0 RC1. When trying to produce a dvi output (ctrl-D, dvipdfm or ps2pdf) Lyx gives an error (see the atached screenshot). Replacing

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325161616.gm29...@sirio.sssup.it... Yep, that did the trick. However, it is going to surprise many people. BTW, why the View button appears twice? Even if it is in two different toolbars, they are the default ones. Because many users

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325162427.gn29...@sirio.sssup.it... Hmmm... the artifacts are now gone, but the toolbars are still unrensposive. No problems here. Did you try a clean user directory? Perhaps there's still some session info left. Joost

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it... I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute some icons. If an icon is missing, the one from the default set will be used. So, there's no maintaining burden as only those

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote in message news:201103251748.53062.sp...@lyx.org... Now having the same item twice (even if one toolbar can be disabled) is *really* bad UI design. A better idea would be to introduce OptItem for the toolbar to let the master-buffer-* items disappear if

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org wrote in message news:201103251812.22547.sp...@lyx.org... The whole thing is not for 2.0. Bad luck. People had two years time to come up with UI proposals. Perhaps it's better to postpone all the UI stuff to a future release. It seems like discussions with a

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4d8cd11d.8000...@lyx.org... Why is this post-2.0 stuff. This is not so difficult ? I think Jurgen's concern is the RC status. As a final suggestion for 2.0: Maybe the UI file could be linked to an icon directory (instead of the

Re: r38036 - lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake

"Kornel" wrote in message news:201103250733.23097.kor...@lyx.org... Why everything instead of adding only *.R? lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib lyx2lyx *.py .) +lyx_install(${TOP_SRC_DIR}/lib scripts *.R .) Kornel Yes that's also fine. Joost

Re: Final round for UI changes

"Edwin Leuven" wrote in message news:AANLkTi=+t2HRjX4oZCoozDFo760_Mo0uVPZ4j5C_x=k...@mail.gmail.com... i guess only the new toolbar layout is left... Yes. I did upload the new toolbar (with optional "classic" toolbars in addition), but Enrico reverted this. I'm not sure

Re: Final round for UI changes

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110324030315.ga29...@sirio.sssup.it... Here is another possible set of icons to be considered. I just noticed the last minute work on the new "liber" icon set. Perhaps we should delete the "oxygen" and "old" sets so only one style of

Re: Final round for UI changes

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325144230.gj29...@sirio.sssup.it... Because it was broken. Apart from artifacts in the upper left corner, after starting LyX with no document open, the toolbars where not responding when clicked. That's probably because your

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Enrico Forestieri" <for...@lyx.org> wrote in message news:20110325142851.gd29...@sirio.sssup.it... On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Joost Verburg wrote: Why did you revert this? What was broken? See attached screen shot. Moreover, the toolbars where unrensposive

Re: Error in clean_dvi.py in Lyx 2.0 RC1

"Ola Ringdahl" wrote in message news:4d8c95d6.7080...@cs.umu.se... There seems to be an error in clean_dvi.py in the windows version of Lyx 2.0 RC1. When trying to produce a dvi output (ctrl-D, dvipdfm or ps2pdf) Lyx gives an error (see the atached screenshot). Replacing

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325161616.gm29...@sirio.sssup.it... Yep, that did the trick. However, it is going to surprise many people. BTW, why the "View" button appears twice? Even if it is in two different toolbars, they are the default ones. Because many

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325162427.gn29...@sirio.sssup.it... Hmmm... the artifacts are now gone, but the toolbars are still unrensposive. No problems here. Did you try a clean user directory? Perhaps there's still some session info left. Joost

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Enrico Forestieri" wrote in message news:20110325143448.ge29...@sirio.sssup.it... I don't agree. As you can see, additional icon sets may simply subsitute some icons. If an icon is missing, the one from the default set will be used. So, there's no maintaining burden as only

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201103251748.53062.sp...@lyx.org... Now having the same item twice (even if one toolbar can be disabled) is *really* bad UI design. A better idea would be to introduce OptItem for the toolbar to let the master-buffer-* items disappear

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Jürgen Spitzmüller" wrote in message news:201103251812.22547.sp...@lyx.org... The whole thing is not for 2.0. Bad luck. People had two years time to come up with UI proposals. Perhaps it's better to postpone all the UI stuff to a future release. It seems like discussions with

Re: r38037 - lyx-devel/trunk/lib/ui

"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:4d8cd11d.8000...@lyx.org... Why is this post-2.0 stuff. This is not so difficult ? I think Jurgen's concern is the RC status. As a final suggestion for 2.0: Maybe the UI file could be linked to an icon directory (instead of the

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote in message news:AANLkTi=91sdj0xspvtseutxq5iddc7hivpmw8ygta...@mail.gmail.com... Iconv.dll depends on msvcr90.dll. An old file somehow ended up in the dependency package. I'll update the installers. Joost

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

Michal ms-li...@ms.sebdan.com wrote in message news:20110321074737.2ec3@ms-dual... This might also be somehow related to http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg85707.html, though I haven't checked LyX 1.6.9 at all. No, LyX 1.6.9 contains the right file. Windows 2000 is

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4d87341c.5050...@lyx.org... I am not sure this is wise... might even be a good reason to step back to MSVC2008... at least until Qt switches to MSVC2010... But you are the one to decide. Windows 2000 is 12 years old and no longer receives

Re: Conversion Error

Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Since yesterday, I've run into a new problem as well. I will occasionally get another error which says: Undefined Flex inset The description says: Flex inset Code is undefined because of

Re: Conversion Error

Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Undefined Flex inset Also, after going to the document settings I'm no longer able to view the PDF output. These class switch errors come back as export errors, although they are

Re: Conversion Error

Rob Oakes lyx-de...@oak-tree.us wrote in message news:000b01cbe7fa$547ab800$fd702800$@oak-tree.us... Any idea as to what might be causing them? The export errors bug is fairly new. I thought that it might be specific to Mac OS X, but after updating the SVN version on my Linux box this morning,

Re: Conversion Error

Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote in message news:AANLkTinV1z9NZR2pe_GXk08aB5vF2+gMPG=owm7fx...@mail.gmail.com... Wild guess: is it possible that after a class change the modules previously loaded get unloaded? Have you tried removing and re-inserting all the used modules? It also

Re: Conversion Error

Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote in message news:4d87a8cf.2070...@comcast.net... Can you please repeat for me exactly what the error is and how I can reproduce it? There was a bug along these lines a while ago. I'm not sure why it has resurfaced. 1) Create any module with an inset, e.g.:

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

"Vincent van Ravesteijn" wrote in message news:AANLkTi=91sdj0xspvtseutxq5iddc7hivpmw8ygta...@mail.gmail.com... Iconv.dll depends on msvcr90.dll. An old file somehow ended up in the dependency package. I'll update the installers. Joost

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

"Michal" wrote in message news:20110321074737.2ec3@ms-dual... This might also be somehow related to http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg85707.html, though I haven't checked LyX 1.6.9 at all. No, LyX 1.6.9 contains the right file. Windows 2000

Re: ANNOUNCE: Windows installer for RC1

"Abdelrazak Younes" wrote in message news:4d87341c.5050...@lyx.org... I am not sure this is wise... might even be a good reason to step back to MSVC2008... at least until Qt switches to MSVC2010... But you are the one to decide. Windows 2000 is 12 years old and no longer

Re: Conversion Error

"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Since yesterday, I've run into a new problem as well. I will occasionally get another error which says: Undefined Flex inset The description says: "Flex inset Code is undefined

Re: Conversion Error

"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:c27fccf8-7391-4fe2-87f0-ab02ae46c...@oak-tree.us... Undefined Flex inset Also, after going to the document settings I'm no longer able to view the PDF output. These "class switch errors" come back as "export errors", although they are

Re: Conversion Error

"Rob Oakes" wrote in message news:000b01cbe7fa$547ab800$fd702800$@oak-tree.us... Any idea as to what might be causing them? The export errors bug is fairly new. I thought that it might be specific to Mac OS X, but after updating the SVN version on my Linux box this

Re: Conversion Error

"Liviu Andronic" wrote in message news:AANLkTinV1z9NZR2pe_GXk08aB5vF2+gMPG=owm7fx...@mail.gmail.com... Wild guess: is it possible that after a class change the modules previously loaded get unloaded? Have you tried removing and re-inserting all the used modules? It

Re: Conversion Error

"Richard Heck" wrote in message news:4d87a8cf.2070...@comcast.net... Can you please repeat for me exactly what the error is and how I can reproduce it? There was a bug along these lines a while ago. I'm not sure why it has resurfaced. 1) Create any module with an inset,

Re: Final round for UI changes (was: Towards rc2)

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110319155427.gd25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... ok, so at this moment we know the new default is going to be oxygen. Should I upload the new icons? Joost

Re: LyX 2.0.0 release candidate 1 - (Non official Win32 binaries)

Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote in message news:20110316165005.go25...@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz... rc1 installer is announced by Joost in one week, so for this moment things are ok, but it would be good if you can try to reproduce the buidling process and let us know whether the instructions can

Re: Final round for UI changes (was: Towards rc2)

Edwin Leuven e.leu...@gmail.com wrote in message news:aanlktikf5+pazt7uj+cga+wkt1kj+3hpsc_xfpkkg...@mail.gmail.com... imo, 4 good reasons to go for it now I agree. Updating the icons and toolbar together makes much more sense. If we put it in now, there's enough time left for fine tuning.

Re: CMake issues

Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote in message news:4d863447.70...@lyx.org... The problem is that cyggomp-1.dll is missing. I guess this should be included in the msvc10-deps package. Thanks. Will fix that. Joost

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >