Hi,
following the usual procedure now, I send to list the patch that is docbook
related.
I know that I have several issues merged under the same roof, but most of it
are one liners.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/ChangeLog
Hi,
following the usual procedure now, I send to list the patch that is docbook
related.
I know that I have several issues merged under the same roof, but most of it
are one liners.
--
José Abílio
Index: src/ChangeLog
On Monday 29 April 2002 15:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Another one for people to have a look at!
Jug
P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
A: I don't want to risk my karma commiting them :P
You are so afraid that you even forgot to send the patch.
On Monday 29 April 2002 15:50, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Another one for people to have a look at!
>
> Jug
>
> P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
> A: I don't want to risk my "karma" commiting them :P
You are so afraid that you even forgot to send the
On Sunday 14 April 2002 15:58, John Levon wrote:
Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in
lyx, or is it a simple matter of providing the export methods for
everything ?
Something like that. That is why I have proposed 1.3 for it.
The LDP lists are discussing
On Sunday 14 April 2002 15:58, John Levon wrote:
> Are there major difficulties in providing support for DocBook XML in
> lyx, or is it a "simple" matter of providing the export methods for
> everything ?
Something like that. That is why I have proposed 1.3 for it.
> The LDP lists are
On Friday, 5. April 2002 11.58,
I am still unable to produce correct postscript or pdf
autoput for LyX-document of the Docbook article (SGML)
class, as it seems that jadetex does not handle unicode
fonts correctly.
Do you know if the the xml toolchain ( with fop for the print backend)
> On Friday, 5. April 2002 11.58,
> I am still unable to produce correct postscript or pdf
> autoput for LyX-document of the "Docbook article (SGML)"
> class, as it seems that jadetex does not handle unicode
> fonts correctly.
Do you know if the the xml toolchain ( with fop for the print
On Friday 05 April 2002 15:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
No. Having same shortcut for different things is not possible
currently. I am confident that it will soon, since ANdre' since
excited about it, and there is not much we can do to stop him.
Ok. BTW you are lucky since André isn't
On Friday 05 April 2002 15:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> No. Having same shortcut for different things is not possible
> currently. I am confident that it will soon, since ANdre' since
> excited about it, and there is not much we can do to stop him.
Ok. BTW you are lucky since André
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 17:56, claus_h wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Claus The unit drop-down menus share the same flaw (cm, mm, in,
Claus text%...)
Do we want to translate them? We have to be careful here.
Inches are called tommer in Danish.
And polegadas in portuguese, if
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 17:56, claus_h wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> > Claus> The unit drop-down menus share the same flaw (cm, mm, in,
> > Claus> text%...)
> >
> > Do we want to translate them? We have to be careful here.
>
> Inches are called "tommer" in Danish.
And "polegadas" in
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 11:01, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:43:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
It also barfs at natbib citation for example.
So would converting the document to docbook and using some sgml tool be
more helpful?
Most of the time is that what I use. To
On Tuesday 26 March 2002 11:01, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:43:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > It also barfs at natbib citation for example.
>
> So would converting the document to docbook and using some sgml tool be
> more helpful?
Most of the time is that what I
Hi all,
the next LyX meeting will be here in Porto (Portugal), from 13 to 18 of
June. (2002 of course :-)
All LyX users and developers are invited.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
Hi all,
the next LyX meeting will be here in Porto (Portugal), from 13 to 18 of
June. (2002 of course :-)
All LyX users and developers are invited.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
On Monday 11 March 2002 18:48, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Thank you very much for your hint. But this behaviour
violates the Principle of least surprise, which I think
is usually appropriate for a user interface. E.g. I often
begin sketching my ideas with just one or two words in a
description.
On Monday 11 March 2002 18:48, Niklaus Giger wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for your hint. But this behaviour
> violates the "Principle of least surprise", which I think
> is usually appropriate for a user interface. E.g. I often
> begin sketching my ideas with just one or two words in a
>
I get this error with latest cvs
Making all in lib
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/lib'
Making all in reLyX
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
I get this error with latest cvs
Making all in lib
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/lib'
Making all in reLyX
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[2]: Leaving directory
Hi,
when I select some test and then paste it, I get, even for a new document,
this:
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x402d7ae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
Current language: auto; currently c
(gdb) bt
#0 0x402d7ae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#1
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 12:20, you wrote:
I hate to reply to my messages but the bug is gone with latest cvs.
My luck is that we aren't on friday. ;-)
--
José Abílio
Hi,
when I select some test and then paste it, I get, even for a new document,
this:
Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0x402d7ae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
Current language: auto; currently c
(gdb) bt
#0 0x402d7ae1 in __kill () from /lib/i686/libc.so.6
#1
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 12:20, you wrote:
I hate to reply to my messages but the bug is gone with latest cvs.
My luck is that we aren't on friday. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, ben wrote:
Hello,
[...]
BG
PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved the
configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere?
Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it in cvs, and
from there fix the
On Monday 04 March 2002 09:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jose m4 is not my favorite language, you know? ;-)
Feel free to ask me for some help.
Thanks, I will do. :-)
JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Monday 04 March 2002 13:16, Angus Leeming wrote:
Since LyX version 1.1 the Standard Template Library (STL) is being used for
most data structures. See some online references recommended by our
developers. We also have some simple coding rules that we try and adhere
to. See
On Monday 04 March 2002 15:06, Yann MORERE wrote:
directory make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/lyxdevel/lyx-devel/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/lyxdevel/lyx-devel/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]:
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, ben wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
[...]
> BG
>
> PS : Jose, you looked at db2lyx some time ago; have you improved the
> configuration process? Have you committed something somewhere?
Not yet. I'm expecting for 1.2.0 to be released to insert it in cvs, and
from there fix
On Monday 04 March 2002 09:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Jose> m4 is not my favorite language, you know? ;-)
>
> Feel free to ask me for some help.
Thanks, I will do. :-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Monday 04 March 2002 13:16, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> Since LyX version 1.1 the Standard Template Library (STL) is being used for
> most data structures. See some online references recommended by our
> developers. We also have some simple coding rules that we try and adhere
> to. See
On Monday 04 March 2002 15:06, Yann MORERE wrote:
> directory make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/lyxdevel/lyx-devel/src'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/lyxdevel/lyx-devel/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
>
On Thursday 28 February 2002 13:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John THe question is, if this can happen, what sense does looking at
John niceFile there make ??
It seems that the idea is to use full path when trying to run latex.
I use it in linuxdoc and docbook with the same purpose.
On Thursday 28 February 2002 13:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> THe question is, if this can happen, what sense does looking at
> John> niceFile there make ??
>
> It seems that the idea is to use full path when trying to run latex.
I use it in linuxdoc and docbook with the same
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 15:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I have little experience with hevea, but it seemed to me at the time
that it got right some things l2h got wrong. But maybe was my l2h
version too old.
Yes, hevea analyses the .aux files, that is the reason why it is my
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 15:11, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I have little experience with hevea, but it seemed to me at the time
> that it got right some things l2h got wrong. But maybe was my l2h
> version too old.
Yes, hevea analyses the .aux files, that is the reason why it is my
On Saturday 23 February 2002 16:39, Niklaus Giger wrote:
What is in your preamble?
--
José Abílio
Just the following line:
\usepackage{hangul}
Then remove it and all should be fine.
The preamble is for docbook related stuff.
Regards
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 23 February 2002 18:10, Niklaus Giger wrote:
I had a LyX-file based on the LinuxDoc class. It had some
Itemize, Description paragraphs. Then I changed the layout
to DocBook class and I got quit a few errors like this:
/usr/bin/jade:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:228:12:E: end tag for element
On Saturday 23 February 2002 16:39, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> > What is in your preamble?
> >
> >--
> >José Abílio
>
> Just the following line:
> \usepackage{hangul}
Then remove it and all should be fine.
The preamble is for docbook related stuff.
> Regards
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 23 February 2002 18:10, Niklaus Giger wrote:
> I had a LyX-file based on the LinuxDoc class. It had some
> Itemize, Description paragraphs. Then I changed the layout
> to DocBook class and I got quit a few errors like this:
>
> /usr/bin/jade:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:228:12:E: end tag for
On Friday 22 February 2002 12:55, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
btw. I changed some initialization reordering in some constructors as
well.
in insetgraphics.C: graphic_label needs to be initialized first.
It was me who added this variable this week, so I'm the guilty part here.
--
José
On Friday 22 February 2002 12:55, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> btw. I changed some initialization reordering in some constructors as
> well.
>
> in insetgraphics.C: graphic_label needs to be initialized first.
It was me who added this variable this week, so I'm the guilty part here.
--
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 20:44, Niklaus Giger wrote:
[...]
Two question:
- Are your planning to integrate CJK-LYX? When?
- Can I help to fix the SGML problem with CJK-LYX ?
If there are bugs that are related to the linuxdoc or docbook output, feel
free to report them. I would be glad
On Thursday 21 February 2002 07:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
When I try to view a lyx file with DocBook article class, which also
contains tex style files in the Layout-LaTeX Preamble, it gives me, while
executing db2dvi, the error,
character \ not allowed in declaration subset'.
On Friday 22 February 2002 04:42, cghan wrote:
If I apply db2dvi to the exported sgml file, it gives the same error.
Doesn't this mean that there is something wrong in the exported sgml file?
Nope. What I intend to say is that your preamble is a latex preamble, not a
valid docbook
On Thursday 21 February 2002 23:49, Niklaus Giger wrote:
Docbook class can be exported to sgml, but trying to
generate html or postscript results in the following error:
/usr/bin/jade:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:3:E: character \ not
allowed in declaration subset
What is in your preamble?
--
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 20:44, Niklaus Giger wrote:
[...]
> Two question:
> - Are your planning to integrate CJK-LYX? When?
> - Can I help to fix the SGML problem with CJK-LYX ?
If there are bugs that are related to the linuxdoc or docbook output, feel
free to report them. I would be
On Thursday 21 February 2002 07:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I try to view a lyx file with "DocBook article" class, which also
> contains tex style files in the Layout->LaTeX Preamble, it gives me, while
> executing db2dvi, the error,
> "character "\" not allowed in
On Friday 22 February 2002 04:42, cghan wrote:
>
> If I apply "db2dvi" to the exported sgml file, it gives the same error.
> Doesn't this mean that there is something wrong in the exported sgml file?
Nope. What I intend to say is that your preamble is a latex preamble, not a
valid docbook
On Thursday 21 February 2002 23:49, Niklaus Giger wrote:
>
> Docbook class can be exported to sgml, but trying to
> generate html or postscript results in the following error:
>
> /usr/bin/jade:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:3:E: character "\" not
> allowed in declaration subset
What is in your preamble?
Hi,
there is currently a bug with docbook and graphics, when the graphic is
located in a slave document. The location of the graphics exported is
relative to the graphics owner, but it should be relative to the master's
location.
I have 2 solutions:
a) Always export
Hi,
answering my own question. The following patch does it, any objection?
--
José Abílio
patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Hi,
there is currently a bug with docbook and graphics, when the graphic is
located in a slave document. The location of the graphics exported is
relative to the graphics owner, but it should be relative to the master's
location.
I have 2 solutions:
a) Always export
Hi,
answering my own question. The following patch does it, any objection?
--
José Abílio
patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Jean-Marc,
this seems to be a result of you last commit. What do you say?
$make
Making all in intl
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/intl'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/intl'
Making all in po
make[1]:
On Monday 18 February 2002 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I say try again.
Done. Now Oll Kright.
JMarc
--
José Abílio
Jean-Marc,
this seems to be a result of you last commit. What do you say?
$make
Making all in intl
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/intl'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/intl'
Making all in po
make[1]:
On Monday 18 February 2002 18:17, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I say "try again".
Done. Now Oll Kright.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 23 January 2002 22:22, Michael Koziarski wrote:
At 10:43 PM 1/23/02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Ok, how do we handle these in bugzilla?
I guess you could say thanks when you mark the bug INVALID.
No way. I don't mark it as WON'T FIX? ;-)
Cheers
Koz
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 23 January 2002 22:22, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> At 10:43 PM 1/23/02 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >Ok, how do we handle these in bugzilla?
>
> I guess you could say thanks when you mark the bug INVALID.
No way. I don't mark it as WON'T FIX? ;-)
> Cheers
>
> Koz
--
José
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 15:20, Alain Castera wrote:
- I didn't checked that it was safe for SGML.
Don´t worry we don´t check this too we normaly give more work to José by
changes to the code, but he likes coding so he´s always happy if he can
add new stuff, isn´t it #:O)
Hi
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 15:20, Alain Castera wrote:
> > > - I didn't checked that it was safe for SGML.
> >
> > Don´t worry we don´t check this too we normaly give more work to José by
> > changes to the code, but he likes coding so he´s always happy if he can
> > add new stuff, isn´t
Hi,
#23 says:
The document language isn't preserved.
Also, other other document options aren't preserved
like paper margins,
some papersize options (e.g. a3, or a4wide),
separation (skip/indent) etc.
I would like to have some example files for it. I have tried to fix most of
these
Hi,
#23 says:
"""
The document language isn't preserved.
Also, other other document options aren't preserved
like paper margins,
some papersize options (e.g. a3, or a4wide),
separation (skip/indent) etc.
"""
I would like to have some example files for it. I have tried to fix most of
On Thursday 17 January 2002 11:12, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I'm glad that you ask this although you will be soon on vacations.
#:O)
I hope you enjoy it. :-)
For latex Standard can have two different meanings. Sometimes it acts
as a paragraph, and sometimes as a place to put latex
On Thursday 17 January 2002 16:07, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 17-Jan-2002 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
I hope you enjoy it. :-)
Well you know we'll visit parents in Argentina and IMO you all follow the
news there. So I only hope it will not be too caotic.
I hope not.
The problem
On Thursday 17 January 2002 11:12, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > I'm glad that you ask this although you will be soon on vacations.
>
> #:O)
I hope you enjoy it. :-)
> > For latex Standard can have two different meanings. Sometimes it acts
> > as a paragraph, and sometimes as a place to put
On Thursday 17 January 2002 16:07, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 17-Jan-2002 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> > I hope you enjoy it. :-)
>
> Well you know we'll visit parents in Argentina and IMO you all follow the
> news there. So I only hope it will not be too
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 11:11, Juergen Vigna wrote:
And one other question couldn't we just have Standard layout defaulting
to layout-no == 0? This would simplify things (when for example I want to
force Standard layout on a paragraph how can I do this now?) IMO.
I'm glad that you ask
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 11:11, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> And one other question couldn't we just have "Standard" layout defaulting
> to layout-no == 0? This would simplify things (when for example I want to
> force Standard layout on a paragraph how can I do this now?) IMO.
I'm glad that you
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 09:24, Angus Leeming wrote:
[...]
Morning, José. Try with $LYX_XFONTS as an absolute directory path. Does
that make a difference?
Nope.
I have tried a little further and using xset -q I noticed that
~/.kde/share/fonts belongs to the font path. since the
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
What is your OS/X-server ?
Red Hat 7.2/ the xfs that comes with that version.
Did you use 'xset +fp' before ?
No.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:53, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
What is your OS/X-server ?
Red Hat 7.2/ the xfs that comes with that version.
xfs is obviously the font server.
Regarding the X-server:
$rpm -qi XFree86
Name
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:31, Angus Leeming wrote:
From the xset man page
+fp or fp+
The +fp and fp+ options prepend and append elements to the current
font path, respectively. They must be followed by a comma-separated list
of entries. The entire font path must be valid; if
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 16:29, Angus Leeming wrote:
Notice that I had the same problem as Angus.
Thanks Dekel and Angus, now it looks really neat. :-)
José, I've just improved mathed.lyx so that the fonts-xlfd file how
contains the right fonts. Perhaps you'd throw in a few lines
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 09:24, Angus Leeming wrote:
[...]
> Morning, José. Try with $LYX_XFONTS as an absolute directory path. Does
> that make a difference?
Nope.
I have tried a little further and using xset -q I noticed that
~/.kde/share/fonts belongs to the font path. since the
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> What is your OS/X-server ?
Red Hat 7.2/ the xfs that comes with that version.
> Did you use 'xset +fp' before ?
No.
--
José Abílio
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:53, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:28, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > What is your OS/X-server ?
>
> Red Hat 7.2/ the xfs that comes with that version.
xfs is obviously the font server.
Regarding the X-server:
$rpm -
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:31, Angus Leeming wrote:
> From the xset man page
> +fp or fp+
> The +fp and fp+ options prepend and append elements to the current
> font path, respectively. They must be followed by a comma-separated list
> of entries. The entire font path must be valid;
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 16:29, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Notice that I had the same problem as Angus.
> >
> > Thanks Dekel and Angus, now it looks really neat. :-)
>
> José, I've just improved mathed.lyx so that the fonts-xlfd file how
> contains the right fonts. Perhaps you'd throw in a
When I follow the instructions in mathed.lyx I always get an error when I
call xset:
xset +fp $LYX_XFONTS
X Error of failed request: 86
Major opcode of failed request: 51 (X_SetFontPath)
Serial number of failed request: 9
Current serial number in output stream: 11
Since the script
When I follow the instructions in mathed.lyx I always get an error when I
call xset:
xset +fp $LYX_XFONTS
X Error of failed request: 86
Major opcode of failed request: 51 (X_SetFontPath)
Serial number of failed request: 9
Current serial number in output stream: 11
Since the script
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I think that the docbook export should be done as the LaTeX one and that
is in the paragraph buffer. Have a look how I made the LaTeX code work.
IMO a similar aproch should be done for all InsetText export code in ANY
format. So
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:09:35AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I think that the docbook export should be done as the LaTeX one and that
> is in the paragraph & buffer. Have a look how I made the LaTeX code work.
> IMO a similar aproch should be done for all InsetText export code in ANY
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:15:19AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Ben == Ben Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ben But, als while we are at it, can someone explain to me why a
Ben Paragraph is not some kind of Inset? I suppose it's historical...
An inset is something one can insert
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So you will be able to insert a paragraph in a paragraph. How will
that look like? You need some kind of wrapper around it, and it's
called an inset nowadays.
Imagine a section inside a chapter. Why not.
The you
Hi,
If I copy some text outside ERT and paste it inside, then I can't
change the paragraph styles inside ert. The styles that are shown are
the same the I had before.
This haappens both using the menu or the keystrokes.
To change it again I need to do those operations outside.
Is
When I try to export some document from the command line it crashes
with the following output:
$~/lyx/lyx-devel/src/lyx --export docbook master.lyx
About to handle -x 'buffer-export docbook'
imageConverted, conversion succeeded.
Loading XPM Image...
lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught
Sorry, you have
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:26:08AM +, John Levon wrote:
what do you mean by style ?
read style as layout.
You should only be allowed standard normal text inside ert ...
Makes sense, but then the layout should be automatically changed to
standard and not left as it is.
regards
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:56:50AM +, John Levon wrote:
I will add it to bugzilla if not known.
please do, and make it bug 53 depend on your bug please
done.
regards
john
--
Of all manifestations of power, restraint impresses the most.
- Thucydides
--
José Abílio
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:21:36AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
And don't assume that Standard means the first style. This may be the
same problem I reported with the hollywood layout, where the first style
is Dialogue, and my ERT's ended up with that style.
Yep. That is hardocoded in
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:07:40AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
One examples is when inserting the include inset. It always reverts
the layout to the first layout. If it is not Standard...
Oops, spoke too soon.
In the Insert menu, the TeX and Insert File entries have
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:15:19AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ben> But, als while we are at it, can someone explain to me why a
> Ben> Paragraph is not some kind of Inset? I suppose it's historical...
>
> An inset is something
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> So you will be able to insert a paragraph in a paragraph. How will
> that look like? You need some kind of wrapper around it, and it's
> called an inset nowadays.
Imagine a section inside a chapter. Why not.
The
Hi,
If I copy some text outside ERT and paste it inside, then I can't
change the paragraph styles inside ert. The styles that are shown are
the same the I had before.
This haappens both using the menu or the keystrokes.
To change it again I need to do those operations outside.
Is
When I try to export some document from the command line it crashes
with the following output:
$~/lyx/lyx-devel/src/lyx --export docbook master.lyx
About to handle -x 'buffer-export docbook'
imageConverted, conversion succeeded.
Loading XPM Image...
lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught
Sorry, you have
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:26:08AM +, John Levon wrote:
>
> what do you mean by "style" ?
read "style" as layout.
> You should only be allowed standard normal text inside ert ...
Makes sense, but then the layout should be automatically changed to
standard and not left as it is.
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:56:50AM +, John Levon wrote:
> > I will add it to bugzilla if not known.
>
> please do, and make it bug 53 depend on your bug please
done.
> regards
> john
>
> --
> "Of all manifestations of power, restraint impresses the most."
> - Thucydides
--
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 06:21:36AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> >
> And don't assume that Standard means the first style. This may be the
> same problem I reported with the hollywood layout, where the first style
> is Dialogue, and my ERT's ended up with that style.
Yep. That is hardocoded
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:07:40AM +, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> One examples is when inserting the include inset. It always reverts
> the layout to the first layout. If it is not Standard...
Oops, spoke too soon.
In the Insert menu, the TeX and Insert File ent
1 - 100 of 767 matches
Mail list logo
