On 30-Apr-2002 Rod Pinna wrote:
Nothing in particular. Just if I have 20 or so floats, and do a spell
check, then then are all opened. I tend to prefer to work with them all
closed. I find it much easier to concentrate on the text.
They remain opened if you find some errors inside, isn't
On 30-Apr-2002 R. Lahaye wrote:
Oh, is there another mailinglist for discussing bugs, apart from lyx-devel?
It's getting really complicated then
I find this too sometimes a bit annoying especially if I want to publicy
discuss a problem on lyx-devel I have to recopy the discussion and
On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
buffer.C... so that the compability reading does not
I want a confirmation for any patch I send to the list. I now don't assume silence
is agreement. So Lars tell me ok and I'll commit tell me nok and I forget about
the patch AND the bug, tell me how you think it should be correctly fix (if you don't
have the time to do it yourself) and I'll have
On 30-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
You could just move your current source tree to, say, lyx-devel-for-1.3, do
a second checkout on lyx-devel and work there.
Andre', having four of these beasts hanging arounf by now
I know and I have at least 6 of them araound (a lot of them for
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I found these and thing they should be changed.
Does the following patch look ok?
| Dunno if it's this patch, but here's one way to crash :
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And this is a different bug from the one I answered to, right?
Nope! I copied it from your reply to this patch!
Anyway I think your patch looks ok.
I'll commit this one then!
Jug
--
On 30-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
It crashes also without your crash but I sent already a patch to fix
^patch
but you surely did understand what I meant, didn't you ;)
Jug
P.S.: In 10 minutes I'm gone so commits for not yet confirmed bugs have
On 29-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> By request, I have obtained the following backtraces from valgrind
> (attached) and gdb from a LyX 1.2.0CVS of today with Juergens patch
> applied compiled with --disable-optimization. They were both made doing
> the same thing as in my prior backtraces.
On 29-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
> I'm building with it now. Can you tell us how we could trigger the
> bug to see it's fixed ? Do you know ?
No I don't, therefore I said "should" (but I'm pretty confident seeing the
backtrace of the bug it can only be that we are going behind the paragraph
On 29-Apr-2002 John Levon wrote:
> Start a new par, and set it to Subsection. Now insert an index list
> in this par (this will reset to Standard). Now click before the index
> button, and reset it to Subsection. Now start typing. Observe drawing
> errors as the cursor is somehow on the line
On 29-Apr-2002 Mate Wierdl wrote:
> application/pdf
> application/postscript
> application/x-compress
> application/x-dvi
> application/x-latex
> application/x-tar
> application/x-tex
> image/gif
> image/jpeg
> image/png
> Plese leave/add those you want in the list, then I will implement it.
>
On 30-Apr-2002 Rod Pinna wrote:
> Nothing in particular. Just if I have 20 or so floats, and do a spell
> check, then then are all opened. I tend to prefer to work with them all
> closed. I find it much easier to concentrate on the text.
They remain opened if you find some errors inside, isn't
On 30-Apr-2002 R. Lahaye wrote:
> Oh, is there another mailinglist for discussing bugs, apart from lyx-devel?
> It's getting really complicated then
I find this too sometimes a bit annoying especially if I want to publicy
discuss a problem on lyx-devel I have to recopy the discussion and
On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
>> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
>> buffer.C... so that the compability reading
I want a confirmation for any patch I send to the list. I now don't assume silence
is agreement. So Lars tell me "ok" and I'll commit tell me "nok" and I forget about
the patch AND the bug, tell me how you think it should be correctly fix (if you don't
have the time to do it yourself) and I'll
On 30-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> You could just move your current source tree to, say, lyx-devel-for-1.3, do
> a second checkout on lyx-devel and work there.
>
> Andre', having four of these beasts hanging arounf by now
I know and I have at least 6 of them araound (a lot of them for
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> I found these and thing they should be changed.
>>> Does the following patch look ok?
>>
>| Dunno if it's this patch, but here's
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And this is a different bug from the one I answered to, right?
Nope! I copied it from your reply to this patch!
> Anyway I think your patch looks ok.
I'll commit this one then!
Jug
--
On 30-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> It crashes also without your crash but I sent already a patch to fix
^patch
but you surely did understand what I meant, didn't you ;)
Jug
P.S.: In 10 minutes I'm gone so commits for not yet confirmed bugs h
On 28-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Can be done with gcc 3.1 and glibc:
[snip]
You mean localize certain WorkArea strings (labels) on the selected
document language?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On 29-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
With emacs-bindings, type M-x
Well I guess with cua too. But I guess that won't be the solution :)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
| it.
I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think it's
On 24-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
ons, 2002-04-24 kl. 15:27 skrev John Levon:
Did that help?
No ! Look at the backtrace yourself then look at the source they are
completely different. Perhaps a valgrind bug ?
Thanks for your backtraces (and patience). Would it be possible for you to
Well as the subject tells us this should fix #350
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web:
Another one for people to have a look at!
Jug
P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
A: I don't want to risk my karma commiting them :P
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL
The last one for today have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
On 28-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Can be done with gcc 3.1 and glibc:
[snip]
You mean localize certain "WorkArea" strings (labels) on the selected
document language?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
On 29-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> With emacs-bindings, type M-x
Well I guess with cua too. But I guess that won't be the solution :)
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 29-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Even if this feature wasn't widely used, it is still bad to drop support for
>| it.
>
> I can agree with that.
It's the same for the indented paragraphs also. We droped that too and it doesn't
seem someone wants it back (appart from me as I think
On 24-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> ons, 2002-04-24 kl. 15:27 skrev John Levon:
>> > Did that help?
>>
>> No ! Look at the backtrace yourself then look at the source they are
>> completely different. Perhaps a valgrind bug ?
Thanks for your backtraces (and patience). Would it be possible
Well as the subject tells us this should fix #350
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web:
Another one for people to have a look at!
Jug
P.S.: Q: Why are you sending all this simple patches to the list?
A: I don't want to risk my "karma" commiting them :P
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL
The last one for today have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
On 26-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
1) It took long time when lyx changed line by line, took that blue
underscore away.
I would like to reemphasize this! Try it with the user's guide; it took 20
secs on my pIII 600.
1. open users guide
2. change language in document dialog
3. select
On 26-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> 1) It took long time when lyx changed line by line, took that blue
>> underscore away.
>
> I would like to reemphasize this! Try it with the user's guide; it took 20
> secs on my pIII 600.
>
> 1. open users guide
> 2. change language in document dialog
>
On 24-Apr-2002 Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
Hi,
I'm using the latest cvs.
Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
with it will lead to a crash.
Andre I think you forget to to a
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
with it will lead to a crash.
Andre I think
On 24-Apr-2002 Lasgouttes, J.M. wrote:
Juergen, I see you did not fix it_Customization.lyx. COuld you do it?
Yes I will have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
That's kind of you.
#:O)
But what is the additional 'if !mathcursor' in 'case 1' good for?
If we click in an inset for the very first time, we need to create the
cursor. Or is this done in the edit() call?
As I said, I am lost...
What do you drink
On 24-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
I'll attach you the file I have not enough karma to commit it myself.
Umm, sorry I should have send a patch!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
the number of rows to scroll, but then we have a hack in scrollDown
which set's this to the workarea-height - (defaultHeight)! IMO this
is pretty stupid.
On 24-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
| a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
| the number of rows to scroll, but then we have a hack
On 24-Apr-2002 Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the latest cvs.
>
> Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
> brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
> with it will lead to a crash.
Andre I think you forget
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> > Right clicking any math environment while the cursor isn't inside it
>> > brings the math panel up as expected, but then tring to insert any symbol
>> >
On 24-Apr-2002 Lasgouttes, J.M. wrote:
> Juergen, I see you did not fix it_Customization.lyx. COuld you do it?
Yes I will have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N
On 24-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That's kind of you.
#:O)
> But what is the additional 'if !mathcursor' in 'case 1' good for?
>
> If we click in an inset for the very first time, we need to create the
> cursor. Or is this done in the edit() call?
>
> As I said, I am lost...
What do
On 24-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
> I'll attach you the file I have not enough karma to commit it myself.
Umm, sorry I should have send a patch!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
the number of rows to scroll, but then we have a hack in scrollDown
which set's this to the workarea-height - (defaultHeight)! IMO this
is pretty stupid.
On 24-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| Lars could you please explain me the wheel_jump value? Shouldn't it be
>| a value in % of the workarea-height? As it is now it seems that it is
>| the number of rows to scroll, bu
On 22-Apr-2002 Michael Schmitt wrote:
at the weekend, I have noticed that LyX crashes eventually (about every
three to fives hours). Unfortunately, I cannot give you a detailed test
case. The only thing I can provide is the following backtrace. Any idea
what is going wrong? If I remember
On 23-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
Yes. Remember that I had to rewrite the code pretty-well from scratch and
that meant learning how it worked as I went along. I just came up with a
solution that was logically correct.
Storing the modified images in the graphics inset and use of
Does someone of you have some experience with valgring?
==30304== Invalid read of size 4
==30304==at 0x8139486: Row::previous(void) const (lyxrow.C:112)
==30304==by 0x816E337: LyXText::draw(LyXText::DrawRowParams , int ) (text.C:650)
==30304==by 0x8179678:
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 11:18 skrev Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
If you have time, you may want to try our valgrind
http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/
I tried it by simply invoking 'valgrind lyx'. The crash did NOT happen
Sorry again what version of LyX are
On 23-Apr-2002 jug wrote:
Modified files:
lyx-devel/src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl.C
BufferView_pimpl.h ChangeLog
Log message:
Remove wrong and unneeded insetSleep/Wakeup functions.
This fixes the bug that the cursor is set to the
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 14:10 skrev Juergen Vigna:
Sorry again what version of LyX are you using? Are you using the current
cvs tree? I seem to see differences in the backtraces valgrind gives and
the sourcecode (for example there is no row-previous
On 22-Apr-2002 Michael Schmitt wrote:
> at the weekend, I have noticed that LyX crashes eventually (about every
> three to fives hours). Unfortunately, I cannot give you a detailed test
> case. The only thing I can provide is the following backtrace. Any idea
> what is going wrong? If I
On 23-Apr-2002 Angus Leeming wrote:
> Yes. Remember that I had to rewrite the code pretty-well from scratch and
> that meant learning how it worked as I went along. I just came up with a
> solution that was logically correct.
>
> Storing the "modified" images in the graphics inset and use of
Does someone of you have some experience with valgring?
==30304== Invalid read of size 4
==30304==at 0x8139486: Row::previous(void) const (lyxrow.C:112)
==30304==by 0x816E337: LyXText::draw(LyXText::DrawRowParams &, int &) (text.C:650)
==30304==by 0x8179678:
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 11:18 skrev Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> If you have time, you may want to try our valgrind
>> http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/
>
> I tried it by simply invoking 'valgrind lyx'. The crash did NOT happen
Sorry again what version of LyX
On 23-Apr-2002 jug wrote:
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/src/: BufferView.C BufferView.h BufferView_pimpl.C
> BufferView_pimpl.h ChangeLog
>
> Log message:
> Remove wrong and unneeded insetSleep/Wakeup functions.
This fixes the bug that the cursor is set to
On 23-Apr-2002 Claus Hindsgaul wrote:
> tir, 2002-04-23 kl. 14:10 skrev Juergen Vigna:
>> Sorry again what version of LyX are you using? Are you using the current
>> cvs tree? I seem to see differences in the backtraces valgrind gives and
>> the sourcecode (for example ther
On 19-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
(Note: the old screenshot was inaccurate, since I faked the cursor (it
wasn't captured) just to show where I'm putting it logically. I've now
updated the screenshow to be perfectly accurate.)
The inset is one line below and 1 pixel to the right of the
On 22-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
Anyway, at least now we're in sync: the criterion is strictly visual, to
the level of single pixels. Got it. Please allow me to try your patience
and go back to the original example (ERT in footnote).
#:O)
Cursor at beginning of footnote (right before
On 22-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:31:16PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I may agree on this with you. The problem is that we cannot fix this and
it is REALLY a very special case, isn't it? The problem is that the inset
wants to go down sees there is no row below
On 21-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
- open new doc with any class
- choose enumeration layout style
- write a word
- insert a displayed formula with alt-m-d
- write something into the mathbox
- leave mathbox and hit control-enter to get a new line
- insert a word
-- the first character
On 22-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
A naive question of Bugzilla policy -- if this is an acknowledged by all
as a problematic issue, why mark it WONTFIX as opposed to setting a
far-away milestone or something? Definitely not 1.2.x stuff, but you do
want it addressed *sometime* by
On 22-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So it the item of a paragraph (think display math) is needfullrow, we
would always have this nasty empty line? I think this will confuse
people a lot.
No we will ONLY have it if we are on the LAST row of LyXText! Hmmm, no let
me see, hmmm, well
On 22-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
Did I mention drawing in two phases: one for metrics computation and one
for the actual drawing lately?
Well in a certain mode we do this already, we draw it so many times until
we got all metrics ready and this can be a multiple step and it can take
more
On 22-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen Do you think it is confusing to create an empty row to put
Juergen the cursor in when needed?
Can we experiment with it later? In 1.3.0?
Sure!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr.
On 19-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
> (Note: the old screenshot was inaccurate, since I faked the cursor (it
> wasn't captured) just to show where I'm putting it logically. I've now
> updated the screenshow to be perfectly accurate.)
>
> The inset is one line below and 1 pixel to the right of
On 22-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
> Anyway, at least now we're in sync: the criterion is strictly visual, to
> the level of single pixels. Got it. Please allow me to try your patience
> and go back to the original example (ERT in footnote).
#:O)
> >>Cursor at beginning of footnote (right
On 22-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 12:31:16PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> I may agree on this with you. The problem is that we cannot fix this and
>> it is REALLY a very special case, isn't it? The problem is that the inset
>> wants to go down
On 21-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> - open new doc with any class
> - choose enumeration layout style
> - write a word
> - insert a displayed formula with alt-m-d
> - write something into the mathbox
> - leave mathbox and hit control-enter to get a new line
> - insert a word
> --> the first
On 22-Apr-2002 Eran Tromer wrote:
> A naive question of Bugzilla policy -- if this is an acknowledged by all
> as a problematic issue, why mark it WONTFIX as opposed to setting a
> far-away milestone or something? Definitely not 1.2.x stuff, but you do
> want it addressed *sometime* by
On 22-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So it the item of a paragraph (think display math) is needfullrow, we
> would always have this nasty empty line? I think this will confuse
> people a lot.
No we will ONLY have it if we are on the LAST row of LyXText! Hmmm, no let
me see, hmmm, well
On 22-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Did I mention "drawing in two phases: one for metrics computation and one
> for the actual drawing" lately?
Well in a certain mode we do this already, we draw it so many times until
we got all metrics ready and this can be a multiple step and it can take
On 22-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Do you think it is confusing to create an empty row to put
> Juergen> the cursor in when needed?
>
> Can we experiment with it later? In 1.3.0?
Sure!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
Angus, I think Rob means that file-export-latex should not
write the original filename. for example:
\includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
exported texfile.
But can't we anymore have
On 19-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
Well have a look at your file and HOW we insert files in tabulars.
TAB's are column separators, NEWLINES are row separators (normally).
Indeed this is how it should be
Well I guessed so.
We could however don't check for the existence of
TAB's and honor
On 19-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
Anyway you didn't answer to my question! What did you paste and what did
you expect! As you wrote the bug-comment I just cannot figure out what is
wrong.
Paste?
Well I meant insert files as lines, but it's mainly the same as doing
a Paste of an external
It's easier to discuss this on lyx-devel so I go for that way.
As before, in a new document create a footnote and within it an ERT inset.
Don't enter any text.
Cursor right before footnote:
Down does nothing, should enter footnote
Why you are at the left of the footnote and press DOWN
On 19-Apr-2002 Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus, I think Rob means that file->export->latex should not
> write the original filename. for example:
> \includegraphics[...]{my.agr}
> is the original latex code. Rob wants it as my.eps in the
> exported texfile.
But can't we anymore have
On 19-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> Well have a look at your file and HOW we insert files in tabulars.
>> TAB's are column separators, NEWLINES are row separators (normally).
>
> Indeed this is how it should be
Well I guessed so.
>> We could however don't check for the existence of
>> TAB's
On 19-Apr-2002 Edwin Leuven wrote:
>> Anyway you didn't answer to my question! What did you paste and what did
>> you expect! As you wrote the bug-comment I just cannot figure out what is
>> wrong.
>
> Paste?
Well I meant "insert files as lines", but it's mainly the same as doing
a Paste of an
It's easier to discuss this on lyx-devel so I go for that way.
> As before, in a new document create a footnote and within it an ERT inset.
> Don't enter any text.
>
> Cursor right before footnote:
>does nothing, should enter footnote
Why you are at the left of the footnote and press DOWN
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| If you ask me we could just release it today! 1.2.0 is much more stable then
| 1.1.6 and has more features. So we could start 1.3.0 and Jean-Marc can trow
| away 1.1.6 and hack 1.2.0 for bugfixes ;)
I almost agree with this... but I want at least a
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I'll try to get a new prelease out today. (it is a but time consuming
since I want to check that a lot of make targets work as expected.
Especially clean and distclean. Also building where srcdir != builddir
and srcdir == builddir must be checked,
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Some compability reading failing. Is the file correct in the first
place? Does the file reading stop at this point or does it continue?
Well the first question coming to my mind is could the files be read with
1.1.6? If yes and we save them again in
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
Why doesn't lyx warn that this file format revision is not well
supported anymore?
I was quite sure you did
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
It probably should... but we have not made any guarantees with 1.2.0
towards 1.1.5.
Well but we should! A lot of people did not change because of the problems
with tabulars in 1.1.6. I think we have to support at least 1.1.5 file format!
Jug
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
In Parser::parse_into1() you check a lot of paterns
On 18-Apr-2002 Juergen Vigna wrote:
While investigating for the sk_??? read I saw that most probably the problem
lies in the mathed parser I will tell Andre when I see where, but for now I
saw just this (no bug just a bit strange handling)
Well it wasn't Andres, but Lars's fault #:O)
He
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
So this is a very old file, but 1.1.6 can read it. Should I just
convert it, or does somebody want to investigate why it does not work?
I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format to be sure!
If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do
On 18-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| He changed all \\end_float to \\end_inset without changing the check for
| this in other compatibility reads (say tabulars!).
So was it a cosmetic bug, or a real one?
Hmm, well, I let you decide if you change the fileformat and then give it
to a
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen I would say now just convert them, going over a 1.1.5 format
Juergen to be sure! If you don't have 1.1.5 anymore I can do it if
Juergen you want.
Yes, please do!
Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I did a
update
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Juergen Hmm well strange enough someone change it_Tutorial already. I
Juergen did a update recently and now the top of it_Tutorial tells
Juergen us:
I said it_Customization.lyx.
Oops ;), well then it is surely no 1.1.5 file as 1.1.5 had version
On 18-Apr-2002 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I do think too that it is one. But you know italian, don't you? This
was for this that I suggested you could take a look, for for your
hacking skills.
And for what should I look exactly? Anyway it seems really bad for me to
edit lyxfiles by hand
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 02:13:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
I cannot do anything with feelings (didn't I tell this already today) and
I learned to not care for them if people cannot give me facts for them!
You should practise not caring a bit.
Hmm
On 18-Apr-2002 Andre Poenitz wrote:
One item is:
- new doc
- click on table toolbar entry to create 'standard table'
- move cursor around in the cell
Cells touch by the cursor get a red box (which is ok) but retain it even
after the cursor left. Nothing serious, but
701 - 800 of 4844 matches
Mail list logo
