[PATCH] Bug 9907: Master-Child Closing Crash

(should!) actually make no difference at all. The advantage is that we can now check, in GuiView::closeBuffer, whether the child is open as a child of some other Buffer before trying to close it. Richard >From d749c635dce01418b8623710d4287d1c9fd62cb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck &

Re: [patch] My first LFUN

On 12/20/2015 06:12 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 20/12/2015 22:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Le 17/12/2015 01:36, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Here's a version with tabular-feature instead of table-modify (and no >>> change to Shortcuts.lyx given that the docs are now frozen). >> >> A

Re: [LyX/master] Work around bug #9841

On 12/20/2015 01:45 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > If what we need is a format change, then it is better to implement the > solution n°3 (attached) described at > . > On the one hand, the format change is very simple. On the

Re: [patch] My first LFUN

On 12/16/2015 07:36 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 16/12/2015 13:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Le 11/12/2015 23:36, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Dear list, >>> >>> >>> Following the discussions in , >>> here >>> are a series of patches meant to

Re: [PATCH] three bugfixes

On 12/20/2015 09:42 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 20/12/2015 04:43, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 12/19/2015 06:35 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> >>> Let me ask naively, what is the expected difference with unchecking >>> "Select master document"?

[CRASH] Master-Child Closing Crash in Master

On 12/20/2015 09:51 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/20/2015 09:42 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Yes, all this parent/child relationship seems quite complicated and ad >> hoc. While testing what would happen when a document has two parents, I >> found the following crash: <

[PATCH] Re: [CRASH] Master-Child Closing Crash in Master

On 12/20/2015 11:48 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/20/2015 09:51 AM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 12/20/2015 09:42 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> Yes, all this parent/child relationship seems quite complicated and ad >>> hoc. While testing what would happen when a

Re: [PATCH] three bugfixes

On 12/19/2015 06:35 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > Let me ask naively, what is the expected difference with unchecking > "Select master document"? I assume you mean "Select default master document"? > (apart from the fact that we need to close the master document and > reopen the child after

Re: #9717: "Insert regular expression" menu is always visible

On 12/16/2015 10:35 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 17/12/2015 03:00, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 12/16/2015 08:30 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:40:17PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>>> Le 11/12/2015 18:27, Richard Heck a

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/16/2015 06:31 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > By the way, Richard are you able to run the tests? You can just build > with CMake: > # better to build from a separate build directory. Then instead of '.' > # give the path to the repo. > cmake . && make > and then run with > ctest -R "lyx2lyx"

Re: [PATCH] three bugfixes

On 12/17/2015 08:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 17/12/2015 03:40, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> Dear list >> >> >> Here are three small bugfixes, all of which are quite straightforward >> (and none change the file format): >> >> 1) Limit the size of navigation menus for performance, which

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/17/2015 05:38 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:41:08AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> The file 'development/mathmacros/testcases_master_child.lyx' is a zipped >> file. >> Removing from tests. > I see. Thanks. > > All lyx2lyx tests pass now for me with Richard's patch.

Re: [PATCH] three bugfixes

On 12/17/2015 08:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 17/12/2015 03:40, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> 3) Use the parent's preamble to preview the child. See >> . I could test that the previews in >> my child document display correctly now. > I can predict

Re: [PATCH] three bugfixes

These look good, but I'd like an opportunity to study them before them are committed. I'll try to get to that tomorrow. Time is tight right now, due to end of semester. And we are trying to sell one house and buy another during the holiday season, which is not easy. Richard On 12/16/2015

Re: #9717: "Insert regular expression" menu is always visible

On 12/16/2015 08:30 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:40:17PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Le 11/12/2015 18:27, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> Hide it. >> I was not proposing to do the fix though. I only relayed Scott's question. > Guillaume

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/14/2015 03:48 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 13/12/2015 17:10, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> On 12/13/2015 04:28 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>>> Richard Heck wrote: >>>> >>>>> Patch. >>>&g

Re: #9875: Problem with alt-modifier. LyX 2.2alpha, OSX El Capitain

Looks reasonable to me. On 12/14/2015 07:29 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 14.12.2015 um 17:39 schrieb Stephan Witt : > >> Am 13.12.2015 um 21:46 schrieb LyX Ticket Tracker : >> >>> #9875: Problem with alt-modifier. LyX 2.2alpha, OSX El Capitain >>>

Re: layout conversion failing

On 12/14/2015 08:26 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Montag, 14. Dezember 2015 um 12:50:39, schrieb Guillaume Munch > >> Le 14/12/2015 11:52, Kornel Benko a écrit : >>> Many tests are failing ATM, because of problem converting layout files from >>> Format 58 to 59. >>> >>> Try to load

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/13/2015 04:28 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> Patch. > Why is font_math not required? In current master it is always written, and > if this was not required in former versions, then there should be some > lyx2lyx step to add it (like for \use_xetex). T

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/12/2015 02:16 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 um 22:15:07, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> >>> Directory: /home/scott/lyxbuilds/master/CMakeBuild/autotests/out-home >>> "_lyx2lyx/mathmacros/architecture" start time: Dec 11 13:09

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

On 12/12/2015 02:54 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Le 06/12/2015 18:18, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > is it > possible to implement the format change

Re: _lyx2lyx tests failing

On 12/12/2015 12:02 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 12. Dezember 2015 um 10:28:35, schrieb Richard Heck > <rgh...@lyx.org> >> On 12/12/2015 02:16 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Kornel Benko wrote: >>> >>>> Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 um 22:15:07

Re: LyX docs are frozen

On 12/12/2015 07:19 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Dear LyXers, > > in order to give the translators the chance to translate the po- and > the doc-files, I hereby freeze the doc files. > > Please add changes you want to make to the changelog files in the git > folder /lib/doc/attic to the/a ToDo section.

Re: compilation fails with gnu make

On 12/12/2015 03:46 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/12/15 21:37, Guenter Milde a écrit : >> Most times it is not necessary to run configure. Just "make" suffices. >> How can I tell when autogen and configure are required? Or is it good >> practice to try them whenever compilation fails? >

Re: lyx.org down?

On 12/11/2015 06:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:54:43PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> It was working fine 5 minutes ago but it has not been working the last 5 >> minutes for me. I normally wait a few hours before sending this email, >> but I've learned that it's good

Re: \origin handling

On 12/11/2015 04:02 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Citing myself: >> I edited now Math.lyx, and not only \origin variable changed, but also some >> graphic insets became absolute path. I had to edit with an editor again. >> This happens with lyx from build-dir and also with installed lyx. > I found the

Re: #9717: "Insert regular expression" menu is always visible

Hide it. On 12/11/2015 12:48 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. Dezember 2015 um 17:41:34, schrieb Guillaume Munch > >> Le 11/12/2015 11:35, LyX Ticket Tracker a écrit : >>> > #9717: "Insert regular expression" menu is always visible >>>

Re: Style question

On 12/10/2015 03:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 10:10:42AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 09/12/2015 06:54, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> Regarding the following code: >>> >>> - >>> void Text::selectWord(Cursor & cur, word_location loc) >>> { >>>

Re: #8796: theorems-named module incompatible with some theorem numbering modules

On 12/09/2015 10:52 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > > > On 12/07/2015 01:38 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 12/07/2015 10:08 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: >>> Thanks. I've been getting ticket updates from the issue tracker. Not >>> sure what your "little proble

Re: 2 compilation questions

On 12/09/2015 04:17 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Mittwoch, 9. Dezember 2015 um 07:49:40, schrieb Stephan Witt >> >>> Sorry, I cannot see the benefit. Yes, it was not wise to name the folder >>> qt4. But the misname doesn't hurt that much. When one does the

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

On 12/08/2015 01:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to older > The root reason for this is that we do *not* support converting layouts to >

Re: 2 compilation questions

On 12/08/2015 06:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 08.12.2015 um 07:47 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >> Indeed libintl is not used anymore since 2.1. > > Thanks. > > So the the remaining point is to rename our Qt4 folder to "Qt", right? > This is not important but since we agreed to rely on Qt 5 we

Re: Style question

On 12/09/2015 12:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Regarding the following code: > > - > void Text::selectWord(Cursor & cur, word_location loc) > { > LBUFERR(this == cur.text()); > CursorSlice from = cur.top(); > CursorSlice to = cur.top(); > getWord(from, to, loc); > - > > It is not

Re: Should we release 2.2.0 with Qt 5.5.1?

On 12/08/2015 05:48 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > my goal is (or I should say it was) that as many people as possible > use LyX. On over 90% of all desktop PCs Windows is used as OS so to > reach my goal I have to focus on Windows, no matter if I like that OS > or not. This may be true in a global

Re: #8796: theorems-named module incompatible with some theorem numbering modules

On 12/07/2015 10:08 AM, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > Thanks. I've been getting ticket updates from the issue tracker. Not > sure what your "little problem" was, but ignorance is usually bliss. :-) All user names got deleted a few months ago. As in: ALL. Does the solution I committed look right to you?

Re: merging of po files done? Send email to translators?

On 12/06/2015 05:50 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:36:17PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> >>> I could not find any wrong looking translations by a quick glance at the >>> resulting diff, so I would recommend to run this command and commit the >>> result

Re: #9873: lyx.org does not support https

On 12/06/2015 06:41 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Christian Ridderström wrote: > >> Note: The LE client needs root access, e.g. to stop/start apache, and to >> do other stuff in order to prove to the LE servers that we (i.e. the >> server) really are the one controlling www.lyx.org and wiki.lyx.org. The

Re: Link to latest pre-release

On 12/05/2015 03:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 06:26:41PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> I just > saw a report of someone who just installed alpha1. This was >> because I had put a link to alpha1 in the bug report a few weeks ago so >> it was natural that they click on

Re: #9873: lyx.org does not support https

On 12/05/2015 05:44 PM, Christian Ridderström wrote: > I'm for enabling HTTPS, and have actually thought it's something we > ought to have... > So I took a look at letsencrypt tonight. It seems doable, but I'm a > little concerned it'll take more work than its worth. > Roughly: > - Ensure

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 12/05/2015 04:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> is it >> > possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for >> 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1 or 2.2.2? > > I am fine with this

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/05/2015 07:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:16:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 24/11/2015 18:57, Richard Heck a écrit : >>> I was mostly thinking that (a) if we're going t

Re: [LyX/master] Add new ProvideStyle tag, which adds a new style only if it does not already exist. This will allow for a proper fix for bug #8796, though that may or may not get fixed before 2.2.0.

On 12/05/2015 07:58 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 12:12:27AM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: >> commit > 4d94460ce32cd086206c4764687457f0c7133922 >> Author: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >> Date: Thu Dec 3 21:06:28 2015 -0500 >> >>

Re: Latest changes in manuals

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/03/2015 08:11 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Don't know, if I should really wonder. > This 18 tests now fail. > 722 - MANUALS_export/doc/el/Intro_pdf2 (Failed) > 726 - MANUALS_export/doc/el/Intro_pdf5_texF (Failed) > 727 -

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

öhr <uwesto...@web.de> >>>> Am 30.11.2015 um 02:35 schrieb Richard Heck: >>>> >>>>> Note also that the use of higher formats does NOT mean the document >>>>> cannot be exported. It means one will have to do manual fixup of local >>&g

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/30/2015 06:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:35:32PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On > 11/29/2015 06:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> Am 29.11.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Richard Heck: >>> >>>> There is no reversion in layout2layout,

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/29/2015 08:38 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 30.11.2015 um 02:35 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> Note also that the use of higher formats does NOT mean the document >> cannot be exported. It means one will have to do manual fixup of local >> layout, to reduce the format number

Just Noticed...

https://www.brown.edu/information-technology/software/catalog/lyx

Re: [LyX/master] Customization.lyx: update localLayout format

On 11/29/2015 11:26 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 29. November 2015 um 17:15:19, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > >> commit 7499b14b50bf528547c5585cbb0f7e2de11b8a8a >> > Author: Uwe Stöhr >> Date: Sun Nov 29 17:15:15 2015 +0100 >> >> Customization.lyx:

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/29/2015 11:52 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 29/11/2015 16:20, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 11/29/2015 06:51 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Richard Heck wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/28/2015 10:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>>> >>>>> B

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/29/2015 03:33 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.11.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> Well, this has a drawback: If we do this, then all files using local >> layouts >> are not longer exportable to version 2.1. > > Oh, that is a big problem in my opinion. I mean we promise backwards >

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 11/29/2015 01:26 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 09:13:46PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:49:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> >>> Le 11 novembre 2015 19:10:05 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak >>> a écrit : What

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/29/2015 02:45 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 29/11/2015 5:38 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 04:17:01AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >>> Am 29.11.2015 um 03:00 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: >>> Your alpha2 installer appeared *very* promptly. Did it incorporate the

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/29/2015 09:35 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 29. November 2015 um 12:20:27, schrieb Georg Baum > <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de> >> Richard Heck wrote: >>> We should presumably make a point of converting this stuff before a >>> release.

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/28/2015 11:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:18:50PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >>> Today I > found out that the LocalLayout in Additional.lyx was still in >>> the very old format 7. I stumbled over this because in the Spanish >

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/29/2015 06:51 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 11/28/2015 10:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> >>> Besides this it seems that I built the lyx.exe including this patch. >>> This was not the plan and I hate git for this. It is hard to figure &g

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/29/2015 06:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.11.2015 um 22:13 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> There is no reversion in layout2layout, so this is not possible. That's >> why I suggested issuing a warning. > > That is bad. You see that my argumentation against backward >

Re: [LyX/master] UserGuide.lyx and Math.lyx: update version number

On 11/28/2015 12:06 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:44:48AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> Am 28.11.2015 > um 03:33 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >>> This is the first of dozens of such changes, where an empty line has >>> been removed.

Re: [PATCH] Fix #9507 now or after 2.2?

On 11/28/2015 06:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I have made a new patch for #9507, which has to do with creating > previews when they are turned on in preferences: > > http://www.lyx.org/trac/attachment/ticket/9507/0001-Update-previews-when-turned-on-in-prefs-9507.patch > > I am slightly worried

Re: alpha2 uploaded and ready for packaging

On 11/28/2015 01:28 PM, Ian Wilder wrote: > On 2015-11-27 08:57:45 +, Scott Kostyshak said: > >> alpha2 tarballs can be found here: >> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0alpha2/ >> >> I will announce it once Windows and Mac installers are available. >> >> Scott >> >> > > Who is

Re: [patch] support for 'solution' in theorems

On 11/28/2015 02:44 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.11.2015 um 04:58 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> Yes, well, we have had that discussion, and you know how it went. > > I know. And you know that I did nt forget solution* purposely. Of course. >> And honestly, it is not that

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/28/2015 09:43 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 03:25:44AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, > 28. November 2015 um 21:06:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >>> Why doesn't LyX take care of updating the layout just as it takes care >>> of updating the

Re: [PATCH] Handle Solution* in lyx2lyx

On 11/28/2015 09:56 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.11.2015 um 04:46 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> Sorry, please try the attached. > > Many thanks. > > I could not apply them or I made a mistake. > I therefore took some of your code and put it in. > > In your patch was

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/28/2015 10:17 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.11.2015 um 03:00 schrieb Andrew Parsloe: > >> Your alpha2 installer appeared *very* promptly. Did it incorporate the >> late commit from Richard about updating bind and ui formats? > > You mean this one?: > >

Re: Why don't we use layout2layout to update local layout?

On 11/28/2015 10:34 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.11.2015 um 03:06 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > >> Why doesn't LyX take care of updating the layout just as it takes care >> of updating the .lyx file format? I ask this for both forwards and >> backwards directions. I guess this means that lyx2lyx

Re: [LyX/master] installer: install Qt plugin DLLs correctly

On 11/27/2015 12:52 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> commit 2bd2aa27811ab08d832f37354e3d2a6f0cbfda8c >> Author: Uwe Stöhr >> Date: Fri Nov 27 00:39:38 2015 +0100 >> >> installer: install Qt plugin DLLs correctly >> >> - also remove support

Re: SIGSEV in alpha1

On 11/27/2015 05:33 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/11/2015 04:45, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 11/26/2015 10:12 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:21:19PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >>>> I will fix this, but can't do so tonig

Re: [LyX/master] UserGuide.lyx and Math.lyx: update version number

There seem to have been some possibly unintended changes with this commit. > commit 695399b062441aceb9c3a1fb29fbe18edf6ba55c > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Sat Nov 28 03:23:38 2015 +0100 > > UserGuide.lyx and Math.lyx: update version number > > diff --git

Re: [LyX/master] installer: remove residues of metafile2eps

On 11/27/2015 09:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.11.2015 um 03:21 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> You might want to read lyx-devel before doing any more of this sort of >> thing. We're not supposed to be making ANY commits without the approval >> of at least one other deve

Re: [LyX/master] Update format of bind and ui files.

On 11/27/2015 08:02 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:27:09PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On > 11/27/2015 01:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: >> commit 1bf01a8ad307729fa486563

Re: [patch] support for 'solution' in theorems

On 11/27/2015 02:08 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 08:00:53PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> Scott > Kostyshak wrote: >> >>> Oops. I take responsibility for this for releasing with unreviewed >>> stuff. Would you recommend I stop the release of alpha2? >> >> No IMHO, since

Re: [PATCH] Handle Solution* in lyx2lyx

On 11/27/2015 10:01 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 27.11.2015 um 23:06 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> The attached patch corrects an oversight in the lyx2lyx code for the >> Solution and Solution* environments, namely, that the latter was not >> handled. Someone please have a look.

Re: [LyX/master] Update format of bind and ui files.

On 11/27/2015 01:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Richard Heck wrote: >> commit > 1bf01a8ad307729fa486563d600ba9d8c2320368 >> Author: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >> Date: Fri Nov 27 11:56:17 2015 -0500 >> >&

Re: [patch] support for 'solution' in theorems

On 11/27/2015 10:10 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 28.11.2015 um 03:48 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> I found a bug: You forgot to revert Solution* in the lyx2lyx code. It >> was completely accidental that I found this, too. > > OK, but this is no reason to stop shipping alpha2. A

Re: [patch] support for 'solution' in theorems

On 11/27/2015 09:35 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 27.11.2015 um 18:55 schrieb Georg Baum: > >>> I don't know if there are problems (apart from the copy-paste error >>> found >>> by Guillaume)... > > Guys, please! If you find a problem then shout but not if there is no > real problem. Jürgen reviewed

[PATCH] Handle Solution* in lyx2lyx

about lyx2lyx tests Richard >From 5d3e7c4b79f2fecc27ee7a0f2f4ec6085622c00b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 17:02:53 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Handle Solution* environment in lyx2lyx. --- lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_

Re: instead of KeepEmpty, force empty?

On 11/27/2015 08:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > We have a way of allowing a layout to be empty via the KeepEmpty tag. > But > do we have a way of _forcing_ a layout to be empty? For example, in > IEEEtran-Conference.lyx we have a note that says "Don't add text here!" > > I also ran across this

Re: SIGSEV in alpha1

On 11/26/2015 05:13 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Now that I have all the icons available, I notice there is still one > there for printing (at least in windows). Clicking it produces a > SIGSEGV. (So does Ctrl+P.) Have you customized the shortcuts, etc, in any way? Richard

Re: SIGSEV in alpha1

On 11/26/2015 06:12 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 26/11/2015 22:47, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : >> On 27/11/2015 11:36 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >>> On 11/26/2015 05:13 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >>>> Now that I have all the icons available, I notice there is sti

Re: SIGSEV in alpha1

On 11/26/2015 10:12 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:21:19PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> I will fix this, but can't do so tonight (Thanksgiving holiday in US). >> It should be considered an alpha2 blocker. > OK good thing you mentioned this explicit

Re: SIGSEV in alpha1

On 11/26/2015 10:52 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:45:53PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On > 11/26/2015 10:12 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 08:21:19PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >>>> I will fix this, but can't do

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/26/2015 05:31 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > On 26/11/2015 11:09 p.m., "Uwe Stöhr" wrote: >> > I've downloaded both and put them in the LyX 2.2/bin folder >> (alongside lyx.exe etc.). Alas it makes no difference. >> >> I can reproduce now your problem. I found the solution: >> >> - create a

Re: Am I the only one not to receive e-mails from Trac anymore?

On 11/26/2015 12:58 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > It happens since Monday. Yet my settings are correct. > I have fixed the problem. Well, maybe that's too ambitious. What's true is that the emails are working again. I assume postfix wil try to send

Re: alpha2

On 11/25/2015 06:32 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:01:04PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >>> - Was qt compiled with zlib support? > > I use the precompiled Qt version for MSVC it is compiled as DLL > including zlib. > >>> - If it was compiled as a dll, is the qsvg.dll installed in

Re: Fwd: LyX 2.2 alpha1

On 11/25/2015 05:27 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:54:15PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 10:08:45AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >>> Same behaviour here on Windows XP: only Classic icons (and yes, I am a >>> dinosaur) >> OK good to know. Seems

Re: alpha2

On 11/25/2015 02:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks to Georg for clearing up the regex situation. > > It would be nice to > make an attempt at a fix for the Windows icon issue > that Andrew has reported. Any opinions on putting this patch in alpha2? > >

Re: Lower case mathcal

On 11/24/2015 02:58 PM, Christopher Menzel wrote: > Dear LyX folk, > > Quick question — what would it take to get display support for lower case > calligraphic letters, which you can get in your rendered PDF via a package > like BOONDOX-cal. Currently, typing lower case letters inside a \mathcal

Re: 'make check' still fails

On 11/24/2015 02:37 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 06:40:45PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> Le 22/11/2015 17:38, Georg Baum a écrit : It is now also clear that the MSVC workaround is not needed, so I deleted it. Is the attached patch OK to

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/24/2015 03:05 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Of course tex2lyx should either do a perfect roundtrip, or create > proper ERT for the new feature. If it does not, then this has to be > fixed. However, if there is a bug in tex2lyx that makes it produce > invalid output for the new feature, which can

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 10:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:10:23PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > >> Uwe, please test that this new patch does what you want it to do. I've >> tested it, but only minimally. >> >> Another issue is that \verbatim* is

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 11:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le > 23/11/2015 01:59, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : >>> Am 23.11.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: >>> I wish I had the knowledge to review the patch but I do not >>> >>> I

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

On 11/23/2015 02:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On > 11/23/2015 11:41 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:35:24AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 23/11/2015 01:59,

Re: simple [patch] support for verbatim*

r 2.2, then it seems to me that we should also have tex2lyx support. What's worse is that tex2lyx makes a total mess of that other file I've attached. Richard >From 029b07ecd0711753095031c375eefe3c6ad05f05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Date: Mon,

Re: Updating LyX.py after a format change

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/23/2015 09:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Should this step be added to the steps we have in Development.lyx? > > For example, something like: > > 4. Update the range of file formats in the array format_relation in > lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py. Yes.

Re: #9841: Preferences specific to the user and not to the file should not be recorded in the file

On 11/22/2015 07:29 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 17/11/2015 21:36, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Guillaume Munch wrote: >> >>> Le 08/11/2015 16:16, Georg Baum a écrit : If I understood Vincent correctly then it would not be a file format change IMHO: As I understood it, he

Re: 'make check' still fails

On 11/22/2015 12:38 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > It is now also clear that the MSVC workaround is not needed, so I deleted it. > Is the attached patch OK to go in? Just one question: The regex that caused the original crash I reported is all right now? I.e., no conditional compilation needs to be

Re: Let's update our 2.2.0 release plan in a week

On 11/21/2015 12:02 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 08:06:16PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck > wrote: >>>> Did Guillaume's regex patch fix the crash you are talking about? >>> >>> Yes, it did. You actually cou

Re: 'make check' still fails

On 11/21/2015 10:40 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/21/2015 10:19 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Le 20/11/2015 19:43, Georg Baum a écrit : >>> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> >>>> I was hoping the recent commit fixing regex issues would fix the >>>>

Re: 'make check' still fails

On 11/21/2015 10:19 AM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 20/11/2015 19:43, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >>> I was hoping the recent commit fixing regex issues would fix the >>> failing >>> test (test_biblio) of 'make check'. I just wanted to confirm that the >>> test fails for

Re: Let's update our 2.2.0 release plan in a week

On 11/20/2015 04:02 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > Binaries for 2.2.0alpha1 have been uploaded and the pre release > has been > announced on lyx-users and twitter. If anyone has a twitter account, > please consider retweeting to get the word out. > > I propose that we wait a week to

Re: Let's update our 2.2.0 release plan in a week

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/20/2015 01:32 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:04:15PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 11/20/2015 04:02 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Dear all, > > Binaries for 2.2.0alpha1 have been uploaded

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >