Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error output of the child process is collected only if
Am 16.07.2010 um 08:13 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>
>>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
>> (SystemCall.cpp)
>> the error output of the child
Am 16.07.2010 um 08:13 schrieb Peter Kümmel:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>>
Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
>>>
Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error output of the child process is collected only if it's going to
an terminal.
I think it would be better to collect it unconditionally to show it in the
message window.
What
Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error output of the child process is collected only if it's going to
an terminal.
I think it would be better to collect it unconditionally to
Stephan Witt wrote:
i'm not sure what are side effects of kicking out
os::is_terminal(os::STDERR) tests.
when i shortly peeked to sources it seems to be little bit messy how we mix
variables
which govern whether we ouput err messages on console and on window.
the right thing might be
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error output of the child process is collected only if it's going to
an
Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
> >> (SystemCall.cpp)
> >> the error output of the child process is collected only if it's going to
> >> an terminal.
> >> I think it would be better to collect it unconditionally to show it in the
> >>
Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
(SystemCall.cpp)
the error output of the child process is collected only if it's going to
an terminal.
I think it would be better to collect
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > i'm not sure what are side effects of kicking out
> > os::is_terminal(os::STDERR) tests.
> > when i shortly peeked to sources it seems to be little bit messy how we mix
> > variables
> > which govern whether we ouput err messages on console and on window.
> > the right
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:31:26PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 15.07.2010 um 15:53 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
> > Stephan Witt wrote:
> I see in the constructor SystemcallPrivate::SystemcallPrivate
> (SystemCall.cpp)
> the error output of the child process is collected only if
Stephan Witt wrote:
Yes, but tex2lyx fails when run from LyX as converter. The output of this
operation I'm looking for.
E. g. with adding a -v to the converter config line or something similar.
But possibly there is some output already and it is lost somehow...
I see in the
Am 12.07.2010 um 13:43 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
Yes, but tex2lyx fails when run from LyX as converter. The output of this
operation I'm looking for.
E. g. with adding a -v to the converter config line or something similar.
But possibly there is some output already and it is
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Yes, but tex2lyx fails when run from LyX as converter. The output of this
> > operation I'm looking for.
> > E. g. with adding a -v to the converter config line or something similar.
> > But possibly there is some output already and it is lost somehow...
>
> I see in the
Am 12.07.2010 um 13:43 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Yes, but tex2lyx fails when run from LyX as converter. The output of this
>>> operation I'm looking for.
>>> E. g. with adding a -v to the converter config line or something similar.
>>> But possibly there is some output
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:12 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output
from tex2lyx.
Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
presentation
in message
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:12 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>>> The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output
>>> from tex2lyx.
>>> Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
>>> presentation
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
Von: LyX Ticket Tracker t...@lyx.org
Datum: 7. Juli 2010 09:01:23 MESZ
An: jer...@malcolm.id.au, st.w...@gmx.net
Kopie: sw...@lyx.org
Betreff: Re: #6805: Cannot convert file importing from RTF, but works on
the command line
Antwort an: lyx-devel
The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output from
tex2lyx.
Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
presentation
in message window?
When tex2lyx is run from the command line, the file is converted
correctly right ? So, I think
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output from
tex2lyx.
Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
presentation
in message window?
When tex2lyx is run from the command
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:12 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output
from tex2lyx.
Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
presentation
in message
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: "LyX Ticket Tracker" <t...@lyx.org>
> Datum: 7. Juli 2010 09:01:23 MESZ
> An: jer...@malcolm.id.au, st.w...@gmx.net
> Kopie: sw...@lyx.org
> Betreff: Re: #6805: "Cannot convert file" importing from RTF, but works
> The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output from
> tex2lyx.
> Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
> presentation
> in message window?
When tex2lyx is run from the command line, the file is converted
correctly right ? So, I
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output from
>> tex2lyx.
>> Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
>> presentation
>> in message window?
>
> When tex2lyx is run from
Am 07.07.2010 um 13:12 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 07.07.2010 um 13:02 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
>>> The import of rtf file fails at the tex2lyx step and there is no output
>>> from tex2lyx.
>>> Is there any possiblity to make it more verbose and collect the output for
>>> presentation
26 matches
Mail list logo