Le 21/11/2016 à 11:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:49, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
I agree, but I could not figure it out.
Do you have a MWE?
That's the point, I don't. I can add a terminal error message to help
find
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:49, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
I agree, but I could not figure it out.
Do you have a MWE?
That's the point, I don't. I can add a terminal error message to help
find one in the future if you think it is going to help.
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:45, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
I agree, but I could not figure it out.
Do you have a MWE?
That's the point, I don't. I can add a terminal error message to help
find one in the future if you think it is going to help.
Le 21/11/2016 à 11:40, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 21/11/2016 à 10:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Can you expand on when w<0 happens? I think that fixing problems (other
than with an explicit workaround) is often a better idea in the long run.
I agree, but I could not figure it out.
D
Le 21/11/2016 à 09:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:04:10AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
But with your recipe I got the attached (unrelated) segfault when
closing LyX.
A bisect led me to fb264663.
Thank you for doing that.
Le 21/11/2016 à 10:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Can you expand on when w<0 happens? I think that fixing problems (other
than with an explicit workaround) is often a better idea in the long run.
I agree, but I could not figure it out.
Le 21/11/2016 à 00:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Backtrace is attached.
Thank you for the trace. Does the attached patch help?
- if (w < 0)
- // this is not expected to happen (but it does)
+ if (w <= 0)
+ // w < 0 is not expected to happen (but it does
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:04:10AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > But with your recipe I got the attached (unrelated) segfault when
> > closing LyX.
A bisect led me to fb264663. I posted on that thread.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 01:04:10AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > Unfortunately I cannot reproduce.
> >
> > But with your recipe I got the attached (unrelated) segfault when
> > closing LyX.
>
> Sorry for the mix-up, only the last trace is relevant.
(short answer: your patch does fix the ass
Le 21/11/2016 à 00:51, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 20/11/2016 à 22:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
After this commit I get an assertion.
To reproduce:
1. Open lib/doc/Math.lyx
2. ctrl+a to select all.
3. Insert > Branch > Insert New Branch. Call it "hello" and press OK.
Hi Scott,
Unfortuna
Le 20/11/2016 à 22:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
After this commit I get an assertion.
To reproduce:
1. Open lib/doc/Math.lyx
2. ctrl+a to select all.
3. Insert > Branch > Insert New Branch. Call it "hello" and press OK.
Hi Scott,
Unfortunately I cannot reproduce.
But with your recipe I g
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:45:03PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> commit b30f8d3c4bffd04bbef16adfc0a5e59e32b160e0
> Author: Guillaume Munch
> Date: Sat Aug 13 19:03:02 2016 +0100
>
> On-screen justification: stretch in proportion with the em, up to a limit
>
> 1) Distinguish expan
12 matches
Mail list logo
