Re: [PATCH] microtype

Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2016, 22:52 -0700 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > I let it in fonts, but no opposition in case others want to > push it into layout. Fine. Text layout would suit better technically, but I think most people will search it in fonts, indeed. Jürgen > > Pavel

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > PhilipPirrip wrote: > > Even Fonts section should be OK, as this makes use and/or changes features > > of individual glyphs and whole fonts. > > Yes, my life would be easier then. But no hard opinion on the issue. I let it in fonts, but no opposition in case others want to

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> > I just blindly copied what was there for other on-off packages, because >> > I have little clue what tex2lyx code does and zero comments in critical >> > sections does not help. I know it's not your fault ;) >> >> Actually the other packages are not

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Georg Baum wrote: > > I just blindly copied what was there for other on-off packages, because > > I have little clue what tex2lyx code does and zero comments in critical > > sections does not help. I know it's not your fault ;) > > Actually the other packages are not on-off, they are off-auto-on.

Re: [PATCH] microtype

PhilipPirrip wrote: > Even Fonts section should be OK, as this makes use and/or changes features > of individual glyphs and whole fonts. Yes, my life would be easier then. But no hard opinion on the issue. > Speaking of this: why is "Use justification in LyX work area" in Text > Layout of

Re: [PATCH] microtype

On 06/01/2016 02:12 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Anyway would you like to see it in text or page layout? Between these two, I say: Text layout definitely! Even Fonts section should be OK, as this makes use and/or changes features of individual glyphs and whole fonts. Microtype isn't ONLY about

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > I just blindly copied what was there for other on-off packages, because > I have little clue what tex2lyx code does and zero comments in critical > sections does not help. I know it's not your fault ;) Actually the other packages are not on-off, they are off-auto-on. This is

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> @@ -813,7 +814,7 @@ void Preamble::handle_package(Parser , string const > >> & name, > >> else if (name == "amsmath" || name == "amssymb" || name == "cancel" || > >> name == "esint" || name == "mhchem" || name == "mathdots" ||

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> @@ -813,7 +814,7 @@ void Preamble::handle_package(Parser , string const >> & name, >> else if (name == "amsmath" || name == "amssymb" || name == "cancel" || >> name == "esint" || name == "mhchem" || name == "mathdots" || >> name == "mathtools" || name

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > diff --git a/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp b/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp > index 24c403d..95212ae 100644 > --- a/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp > +++ b/src/tex2lyx/Preamble.cpp > @@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ Preamble::Preamble() : one_language(true), > explicit_babel(false), >

Re: [PATCH] microtype

On 01.06.16 16:21, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-06-01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > >> 2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller : > >>> Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable". > >>>

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > BTW, character protusion and font expansion are not so much a font > property, but a page layout property. I guess its both. Anyway would you like to see it in text or page layout? Pavel

Re: [PATCH] microtype

On 2016-06-01, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --] > 2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller : >> Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable". >> Instead of "Use microtype", the GUI should be something

Re: [PATCH] microtype

2016-06-01 11:43 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable". > > Instead of "Use microtype", the GUI should be something like "Enable > micro-typographic extensions" > > And the tooltip: > > "Activates micro-typographic

Re: [PATCH] microtype

2016-06-01 11:02 GMT+02:00 Pavel Sanda : > So updated patch for master. I decided to make fileformat change > instead of module. > > Will commit unless there are some comments. > Do not use LateXisms in the GUI -- we just got rid of "Use longtable". Instead of "Use microtype",

Re: [PATCH] microtype

So updated patch for master. I decided to make fileformat change instead of module. Will commit unless there are some comments. Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > > I got the same impression after some tests with a *.tex file here. > > This is also what the documentation tells: it

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Guenter Milde wrote: > I got the same impression after some tests with a *.tex file here. > This is also what the documentation tells: it works for all three of > pdflatex, xelatex, and lualatex but only pdflatex supports all features. > There is no error with "plain" latex (DVI, PS, PDF (ps2pdf),

Re: [PATCH] microtype

On 2016-02-21, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 21/02/2016 08:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit : is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for params) which would result into simple

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Le 21/02/2016 08:33, Pavel Sanda a écrit : is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for params) which would result into simple \usepackage[...]{microtype} in header? Is there any opposition to

Re: [PATCH] microtype

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Attached is the patch which is applicable against current master. Slightly updated patch. P diff --git a/development/FORMAT b/development/FORMAT index 1d24d92..406f076 100644 --- a/development/FORMAT +++ b/development/FORMAT @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ adjustments are made to tex2lyx

[PATCH] microtype

Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-19, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > LaTeX experts, > > > is there some obstacle I should be aware of before implementing microtype > > support via simple checkbox in document setting (plus maybe edit box for > > params) which would result into simple