Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. Then the thing to do, I guess, is to add a check for each package
> one of our modules needs, and then I'll add the relevant code to pop
> up a warning whenever you try to use one that requires an unavailable
> package. As exams are just about over, I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, with an explanation that it is useful for the linguistics module.
> It may be put in a different section.
I think I will add a section "packages needed by modules" and add a
subsection "Linguistics". OK?
Jürgen
Richard Heck wrote:
>> And further: what can I do if only a few of the elements require a given
>> package?
>>
>>
> Nothing directly, so far as I can see.
Hm. How about a "requires" tag?
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
OK, good. Is there a simple mechanism for getting new things checked by
chkconfig? Or is that the hard part? I'd guess we should at least check
for the packages needed by our own modules.
This is easy. It's described in chkconfig.ltx:
%%% If
rgheck wrote:
> OK, good. Is there a simple mechanism for getting new things checked by
> chkconfig? Or is that the hard part? I'd guess we should at least check
> for the packages needed by our own modules.
This is easy. It's described in chkconfig.ltx:
%%% If you want to add new packages/docum
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
>> None, despite that I miss the entry for covington in LaTeXConfig.lyx and
>> the check for it in chkconfig.ltx.
>
> What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules?
Yes, with an explanation that it is useful for the lingu
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
rgheck wrote:
I agree that this would be nice, but at present there is no mechanism
for checking whether the packages a given module needs are actually
installed. I would suppose that this could be done by adapting
chkconfig.ltx, but I'm useless when it comes to t
rgheck wrote:
> I agree that this would be nice, but at present there is no mechanism
> for checking whether the packages a given module needs are actually
> installed. I would suppose that this could be done by adapting
> chkconfig.ltx, but I'm useless when it comes to that kind of LaTeX
> progra
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module
shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does
this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the result to LaTeXConfig.lyx.
For MiKTeX, the covington pac
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module
> shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does
> this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the result to LaTeXConfig.lyx.
> For MiKTeX, the covington package will automatically be
> When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module
> shouldn't be available, therefore we need to check this. configure.py does
does 'not available' mean that it won't be enabled or that ot won't visible at
all?
pavel
> What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules?
When the users don't have corvington installed, the covington module shouldn't be available,
therefore we need to check this. configure.py does this by accessing chkconfig.ltx and writes the
result to LaTeXConfig.lyx.
For MiKTeX, the covin
rgheck wrote:
> I didn't test it, but this looks great. This is exactly the kind of
> thing for which modules are useful.
Yes. modules very much pay off here.
Jürgen
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> None, despite that I miss the entry for covington in LaTeXConfig.lyx and
> the check for it in chkconfig.ltx.
What is the policy? Do we need this for the modules?
Jürgen
> Objections?
None, despite that I miss the entry for covington in LaTeXConfig.lyx and the check for it in
chkconfig.ltx.
regards Uwe
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
I'd like to add the attached linguistics.module to trunk. It adds support for
numbered examples and glosses (using covington.sty) as well as for some
frequently used character styles (expression, meaning, concept).
I've also written an example file that demonstrates t
I'd like to add the attached linguistics.module to trunk. It adds support for
numbered examples and glosses (using covington.sty) as well as for some
frequently used character styles (expression, meaning, concept).
I've also written an example file that demonstrates the use of the module.
Objec
17 matches
Mail list logo
