On Sunday 03 June 2007 08:42:23 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
the thread anymore.
Stefan
Yes, I do. In cases like this I expect a clear conclusion from the thread. An
as it seems the exchange of arguments is still going.
--
Am 04.06.2007 um 14:33 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 08:42:23 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
the thread anymore.
Stefan
Yes, I do. In cases like this I expect a clear conclusion from the
thread. An
as it seems
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
--
José Abílio
Am 04.06.2007 um 16:54 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
The patches in the new
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 04.06.2007 um 16:54 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
On Monday 04 June 2007 17:19:07 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Yes, the patches in the new thread from this morning
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/86583) are all OKed
by me.
Stefan, you can proceed with those.
--
José Abílio
Am 04.06.2007 um 20:07 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 17:19:07 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Yes, the patches in the new thread from this morning
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/86583) are all
OKed
by me.
Stefan, you can proceed with those.
Thanks!
Stefan
On Sunday 03 June 2007 08:42:23 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
> the thread anymore.
>
> Stefan
Yes, I do. In cases like this I expect a clear conclusion from the thread. An
as it seems the exchange of arguments is still going.
Am 04.06.2007 um 14:33 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 08:42:23 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
the thread anymore.
Stefan
Yes, I do. In cases like this I expect a clear conclusion from the
thread. An
as it seems
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
> ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
--
José Abílio
Am 04.06.2007 um 16:54 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
The patches in the new
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 04.06.2007 um 16:54 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 14:06:59 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
There are several patches we were discussing. Those posted are the
ones both me and Dov agreed on.
And are those present in the new thread you have opened today?
On Monday 04 June 2007 17:19:07 Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Yes, the patches in the new thread from this morning
> (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/86583) are all OKed
> by me.
Stefan, you can proceed with those.
--
José Abílio
Am 04.06.2007 um 20:07 schrieb José Matos:
On Monday 04 June 2007 17:19:07 Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Yes, the patches in the new thread from this morning
(http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/86583) are all
OKed
by me.
Stefan, you can proceed with those.
Thanks!
Stefan
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition if (cur.boundary() !
bidi.isBoundary..., it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos() + 1, true, false);
(the + 1 is wrong; see what happens at the end of
José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
the thread anymore.
Stefan
Am 03.06.2007 um 09:36 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition if (cur.boundary() !
bidi.isBoundary..., it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true,
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL-LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is
discussed in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/
80783. An illustration of the current situation and the one after
this patch are visible at
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of the
logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def
abc [ WERBEH]|def
abc|[WERBEH ]def
abc[|WERBEH] def
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space should be inserted. The last
two don't fulfill the condition that the previous
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of the
logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def
abc [ WERBEH]|def
abc|[WERBEH ]def
abc[|WERBEH] def
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space should be inserted. The last
two don't fulfill the
Am 03.06.2007 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Gerz:
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of
the logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def
abc [ WERBEH]|def
abc|[WERBEH ]def
abc[|WERBEH] def
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space should
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition if (cur.boundary()
!bidi.isBoundary..., it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos() + 1, true, false);
(the + 1 is wrong; see
Am 03.06.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition if (cur.boundary() !
bidi.isBoundary..., it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(),
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 03.06.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition if (cur.boundary()
!bidi.isBoundary..., it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL-LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is discussed
in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/80783. An
illustration of the current situation and the one after this patch
are
Am 03.06.2007 um 23:12 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL-LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is
discussed in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/
80783. An illustration of the
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov But then you have a somewhat weird situation, where you're at the
Dov end of a line, and pressing delete deletes from the beginning of
Dov the next line, where the cursor isn't. That does not seem
Dov natural to me... (Of course it's the
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition "if (cur.boundary() && !
bidi.isBoundary...", it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos() + 1, true, false);
(the + 1 is wrong; see what happens at the end
José, what is your opinion about all that. I guess you don't follow
the thread anymore.
Stefan
Am 03.06.2007 um 09:36 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition "if (cur.boundary() && !
bidi.isBoundary...", it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(),
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL<->LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is
discussed in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/
80783. An illustration of the current situation and the one after
this patch are visible at
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of the
logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def"
abc [ WERBEH]|def"
abc|[WERBEH ]def"
abc[|WERBEH] def"
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space should be inserted. The last
two don't fulfill the condition that the previous
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of the
logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def"
abc [ WERBEH]|def"
abc|[WERBEH ]def"
abc[|WERBEH] def"
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space should be inserted. The last
two don't fulfill the
Am 03.06.2007 um 15:29 schrieb Michael Gerz:
Stefan Schimanski schrieb:
Slight correction of the EPM patch: there are these exceptions of
the logic to avoid double spaces:
abc [WERBEH|] def"
abc [ WERBEH]|def"
abc|[WERBEH ]def"
abc[|WERBEH] def"
All 4 should be possible, i.e. a space
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition "if (cur.boundary() &&
!bidi.isBoundary...", it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos() + 1, true, false);
(the + 1 is wrong;
Am 03.06.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition "if (cur.boundary() && !
bidi.isBoundary...", it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(),
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 03.06.2007 um 21:28 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
1) In Text2.cpp, in the condition "if (cur.boundary() &&
!bidi.isBoundary...", it should be:
return setCursor(cur, cur.pit(), cur.pos(), true, false);
and not, as you have:
return
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL<->LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is discussed
in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/80783. An
illustration of the current situation and the one after this patch
are
Am 03.06.2007 um 23:12 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
* rtlspaces.patch: There is a inconsistency between the font of
spaces at RTL<->LTR boundaries. The whole space problem is
discussed in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/
80783. An illustration of the
> "Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> But then you have a somewhat weird situation, where you're at the
Dov> end of a line, and pressing delete deletes from the beginning of
Dov> the next line, where the cursor "isn't". That does not seem
Dov> natural to me... (Of course
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
I cleaned up the patches to prepare them for committing: Again there are
three, which are half depending on each other. Together the RTL behavior
is correct (a lyx2lyx patch is still missing to convert LyX 1.3's
wrong encoding of RTL paragraphs into the new one).
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
I cleaned up the patches to prepare them for committing: Again there are
three, which are half depending on each other. Together the RTL behavior
is correct (a lyx2lyx patch is still missing to convert LyX 1.3's
"wrong" encoding of RTL paragraphs into the new
Hi!
I cleaned up the patches to prepare them for committing: Again there
are three, which are half depending on each other. Together the RTL
behavior is correct (a lyx2lyx patch is still missing to convert LyX
1.3's wrong encoding of RTL paragraphs into the new one).
* rtlboundary.patch:
Hi!
I cleaned up the patches to prepare them for committing: Again there
are three, which are half depending on each other. Together the RTL
behavior is correct (a lyx2lyx patch is still missing to convert LyX
1.3's "wrong" encoding of RTL paragraphs into the new one).
*
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan I will make a clean patch tomorrow morning. It adds another
Stefan return value to cursorPos which tell whether insets in deeper
Stefan slices will be put to the left or right of the returned
Stefan position.
This is indeed one of
As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes our
former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic on RTL-
boundaries.
@Dov: For the example where your patch was wrong, make a selection,
starting in an RTL paragraph, ending in a LTR paragraph. One of the
two
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:36:13PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:29 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
Dov It fixes issue (3) of
Dov
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes
Stefan our former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic
Stefan on RTL- boundaries.
A few comments: first, I am not sure I like
+bool Text::isRTL(Buffer const
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes our
former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic on
RTL-boundaries.
I don't understand what I'm supposed to apply this patch against.
@Dov: For the example where your patch was wrong, make
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line 279(?) of
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on
line 347 of the
Am 31.05.2007 um 21:57 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the next
line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from there)
start backspacing. When you try to delete the last
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:10 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the
next line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from
there) start
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStructure(cur.buffer(), cur);
}
- if (cur.pos() ==
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, makes sense. The character then entered should be with the font of
the character at that position.
Stefan --- once you're at it, should Text2.cpp:768 (in setCurrentFont)
be changed:
- if ((pos 0 cur.boundary()) || pos == cur.lastpos())
--pos;
+ if
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
For those who want to try it out (for reference please look at the
single patches), here is everything together in one patch.
Stefan
rtl.patch
Description: Binary data
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
We're redrawing the whole thing, too? Is *that* necessary after
every backspace?!
Everything = the paragraph. That are the rules of the games
currently. I and others have ideas to speed up the drawing
considerable for 1.6.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes our
former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic on
RTL-boundaries.
I don't understand what I'm supposed to apply this patch against.
@Dov: For the example where your patch was wrong, make
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line 279(?) of
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit separately).
Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on line 347 of
the patch file, or at line
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile --- there's a semicolon missing on
line 347 of the
Am 31.05.2007 um 21:57 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including another patch --- which BTW, I would still commit
separately). Then it didn't compile
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the next
line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from there)
start backspacing. When you try to delete the last
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:10 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Anyhow, to reproduce:
1) type a long long string with no space, until it breaks to the
next line.
2) from the last position in the paragraph (it only works from
there) start
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
checkBufferStructure(cur.buffer(), cur);
}
- if (cur.pos() ==
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, makes sense. The character then entered should be with the font of
the character at that position.
Stefan --- once you're at it, should Text2.cpp:768 (in setCurrentFont)
be changed:
- if ((pos > 0 && cur.boundary()) || pos == cur.lastpos())
--pos;
+
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
For those who want to try it out (for reference please look at the
single patches), here is everything together in one patch.
Stefan
rtl.patch
Description: Binary data
As always, Stefan, you are right :) .
I applied your patch (what threw me off was what you said about
including
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:54 schrieb Dov Feldstern:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 31.05.2007 um 22:27 schrieb Stefan Schimanski:
The patch:
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(Revision 18599)
+++ src/Text.cpp(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1330,8 +1331,10 @@
We're redrawing the whole thing, too? Is *that* necessary after
every backspace?!
Everything = the paragraph. That are the rules of the games
currently. I and others have ideas to speed up the drawing
considerable for 1.6.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I will make a clean patch tomorrow morning. It adds another
Stefan> return value to cursorPos which tell whether insets in deeper
Stefan> slices will be put to the left or right of the returned
Stefan> position.
This is
As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes our
former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic on RTL-
boundaries.
@Dov: For the example where your patch was wrong, make a selection,
starting in an RTL paragraph, ending in a LTR paragraph. One of the
two
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 11:36:13PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Am 30.05.2007 um 23:29 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> >>"Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >Dov> Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
> >Dov> It fixes issue (3) of
>
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> As promised, here it is. This is the way to do it. It includes
Stefan> our former patch for cursorLeft/Right to avoid boundary magic
Stefan> on RTL- boundaries.
A few comments: first, I am not sure I like
+bool
Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
It fixes issue (3) of http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551,
which is a regression.
It works.
The concept makes sense.
The implementation -- well, we don't love it, but we haven't gotten any
better suggestions. (The
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
Dov It fixes issue (3) of
Dov http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551, which is a
Dov regression.
Dov It works. The concept makes sense. The implementation -- well, we
Dov
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
José?
JMarc
OK.
--
José Abílio
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:29 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
Dov It fixes issue (3) of
Dov http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551, which is a
Dov regression.
Dov It works. The
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:32 schrieb José Matos:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
José?
JMarc
OK.
See my comment please. I think I have a case where the proposed
solution is wrong. But I cannot implement it
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:32 schrieb José Matos:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
José?
JMarc
OK.
See my comment please. I think I have a case where the proposed solution
is wrong. But
Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
It fixes issue (3) of http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551,
which is a regression.
It works.
The concept makes sense.
The implementation -- well, we don't love it, but we haven't gotten any
better suggestions. (The
> "Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
Dov> It fixes issue (3) of
Dov> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551, which is a
Dov> regression.
Dov> It works. The concept makes sense. The implementation --
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dov> So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
>
> José?
>
> JMarc
OK.
--
José Abílio
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:29 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> Please, could someone respond regarding this patch from Elazar?
Dov> It fixes issue (3) of
Dov> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3551, which is a
Dov> regression.
Dov> It
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:32 schrieb José Matos:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov> So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
José?
JMarc
OK.
See my comment please. I think I have a case where the proposed
solution is wrong. But I cannot implement it
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 30.05.2007 um 23:32 schrieb José Matos:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 22:29:12 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov> So please, can we have it okayed and committed?
José?
JMarc
OK.
See my comment please. I think I have a case where the proposed solution
is wrong. But
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov == Dov Feldstern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have
Dov to add it in 4 or 5 new places.
Very good argument. Thanks for checking.
Dov Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in for a
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Dov" == Dov Feldstern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dov> So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have
Dov> to add it in 4 or 5 new places.
Very good argument. Thanks for checking.
Dov> Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have
Dov to add it in 4 or 5 new places.
Very good argument. Thanks for checking.
Dov Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in for a while (since r10513,
Dov 10/2005), I don't know why
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dov == Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dov So, if we move Martin's test out of cursorX, we're going to have
Dov to add it in 4 or 5 new places.
Very good argument. Thanks for checking.
Dov Finally, (a) Martin's test has been in for a while (since r10513,
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
