Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > - doubles consume 64bit in memory but 80bit in processor registers (on x86 This was the missing piece of the puzzle, now makes sense. P

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-17 Thread Georg Baum
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >> >> > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations >> >> I cannot reproduce using these flags with gcc 4.9.2. > > Shouldn't matter IMHO, but running 32 bit here. That might explain it. I am on 64bit. >> >> Pavel,

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Georg Baum wrote: > >> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination > >> with optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). > >> Which compiler switches do you use? > > > > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-16 Thread Georg Baum
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination >> with optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). >> Which compiler switches do you use? > > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations I

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-16 Thread Georg Baum
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Looks like there is an extra pair of parenthesis. Thanks, I noticed that meanwhile as well. Update patch follows soon. Georg

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-16 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:18:10 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tar balls and sig files are here: > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/02/2016 21:54, Georg Baum a écrit : I will have a look at this after the beta. My usual procedure is to use the standard C99 function lround() for rounding, but MSVC10 does not have it. Does it work with the attached patch? - return static_cast(result + ((result >= 0) ? 0.5 :

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination with > optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). Which > compiler switches do you use? -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations > I will have a look at this

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-11 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:49:59PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > > > > > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P > > > > diff: > > --- runtime.output 2016-02-10

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-11 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > Hi Scott, > > the tarball is incomplete. There are several 3rdparty files missing: Thank you very much for building from the tar ball! The procedure did its job: It found out that we did some mistakes when adding files

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-11 Thread Georg Baum
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. >> > >> > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P >> >> diff: >> --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800 >> +++ Length 2015-07-22

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-11 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 11/02/2016 02:40, Andrew Parsloe a écrit : On 11/02/2016 1:28 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: I built an installer for beta 1 and uploaded it: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-1/ regards Uwe I've downloaded and installed this on a windows 7 machine. Initial impressions are good. In particular,

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The tar balls and sig files are here: > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > For Ubuntu:

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The tar balls and sig files are here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 Packagers, please prepare your binaries. Hi Scott, the tarball is incomplete. There are several 3rdparty files missing: - CMake

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:28:53AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >The tar balls and sig files are here: > > > >https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 > > > >Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > Hi Scott, >

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > > > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P > > diff: > --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800 > +++ Length 2015-07-22 08:54:17.0 -0700 > @@

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Andrew Parsloe
On 11/02/2016 1:28 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote: I built an installer for beta 1 and uploaded it: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-1/ regards Uwe I've downloaded and installed this on a windows 7 machine. Initial impressions are good. In particular, #9085 dealing with instant preview and split

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P diff: --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800 +++ Length 2015-07-22 08:54:17.0 -0700 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ 36 5855 5855 -9953

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Cor Blom
Op 10-02-16 om 04:18 schreef Scott Kostyshak: The tar balls and sig files are here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 Packagers, please prepare your binaries. Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball) and basic

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Cor Blom wrote: > Op 10-02-16 om 04:18 schreef Scott Kostyshak: > >The tar balls and sig files are here: > > > >https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 > > > >Packagers, please prepare your binaries. > > > >Non-packagers,

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:35:00AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 11.02.2016 um 01:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > >>The tarball should be fixed. I noted that the build scripts > >>"build5-2010*.bat" are also missing in the tarball. > > > >Great, I'm glad that you fixed this. > > Why is this

Re: 2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-10 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 11.02.2016 um 01:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: The tarball should be fixed. I noted that the build scripts "build5-2010*.bat" are also missing in the tarball. Great, I'm glad that you fixed this. Why is this great? The tarball is incomplete and one can therefore not build LyX from it.

2.2.0beta1 tar balls are available

2016-02-09 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The tar balls and sig files are here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0 Packagers, please prepare your binaries. Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball) and basic functionality on your platform, and let us know how it