Georg Baum wrote:
> - doubles consume 64bit in memory but 80bit in processor registers (on x86
This was the missing piece of the puzzle, now makes sense. P
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>>
>> > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations
>>
>> I cannot reproduce using these flags with gcc 4.9.2.
>
> Shouldn't matter IMHO, but running 32 bit here.
That might explain it. I am on 64bit.
>>
>> Pavel,
Georg Baum wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> > Georg Baum wrote:
> >> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination
> >> with optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build).
> >> Which compiler switches do you use?
> >
> > -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination
>> with optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build).
>> Which compiler switches do you use?
>
> -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations
I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks like there is an extra pair of parenthesis.
Thanks, I noticed that meanwhile as well. Update patch follows soon.
Georg
On Tuesday, February 09, 2016 10:18:10 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The tar balls and sig files are here:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
>
> Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
> Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the
Le 11/02/2016 21:54, Georg Baum a écrit :
I will have a look at this after the beta. My usual procedure is to use the
standard C99 function lround() for rounding, but MSVC10 does not have it.
Does it work with the attached patch?
- return static_cast(result + ((result >= 0) ? 0.5 :
Georg Baum wrote:
> No, but I believe I know the reason: self made rounding in combination with
> optimization (I created the test reference with a debug build). Which
> compiler switches do you use?
-Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 -g -O2 -Wno-deprecated-declarations
> I will have a look at this
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:49:59PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> > >
> > > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P
> >
> > diff:
> > --- runtime.output 2016-02-10
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> the tarball is incomplete. There are several 3rdparty files missing:
Thank you very much for building from the tar ball! The procedure did its
job: It found out that we did some mistakes when adding files
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>> >
>> > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P
>>
>> diff:
>> --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800
>> +++ Length 2015-07-22
Le 11/02/2016 02:40, Andrew Parsloe a écrit :
On 11/02/2016 1:28 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I built an installer for beta 1 and uploaded it:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-1/
regards Uwe
I've downloaded and installed this on a windows 7 machine. Initial
impressions are good. In particular,
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The tar balls and sig files are here:
>
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
>
> Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
For Ubuntu:
Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The tar balls and sig files are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Hi Scott,
the tarball is incomplete. There are several 3rdparty files missing:
- CMake
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:28:53AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 10.02.2016 um 04:18 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> >https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
> >
> >Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
> Hi Scott,
>
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> >
> > Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P
>
> diff:
> --- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800
> +++ Length 2015-07-22 08:54:17.0 -0700
> @@
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P
On 11/02/2016 1:28 p.m., Uwe Stöhr wrote:
I built an installer for beta 1 and uploaded it:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-1/
regards Uwe
I've downloaded and installed this on a windows 7 machine. Initial
impressions are good. In particular, #9085 dealing with instant preview
and split
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
> Gentoo build now fails for tests/test_Length. P
diff:
--- runtime.output 2016-02-10 18:47:27.0 -0800
+++ Length 2015-07-22 08:54:17.0 -0700
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
36
5855
5855
-9953
Op 10-02-16 om 04:18 schreef Scott Kostyshak:
The tar balls and sig files are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball) and
basic
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Cor Blom wrote:
> Op 10-02-16 om 04:18 schreef Scott Kostyshak:
> >The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> >https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
> >
> >Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> >
> >Non-packagers,
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 02:35:00AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 11.02.2016 um 01:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >>The tarball should be fixed. I noted that the build scripts
> >>"build5-2010*.bat" are also missing in the tarball.
> >
> >Great, I'm glad that you fixed this.
>
> Why is this
Am 11.02.2016 um 01:43 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The tarball should be fixed. I noted that the build scripts
"build5-2010*.bat" are also missing in the tarball.
Great, I'm glad that you fixed this.
Why is this great? The tarball is incomplete and one can therefore not
build LyX from it.
The tar balls and sig files are here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/y57gkjh8xo89ct4/AACbDGN83b4eq0cjkgR8tsq9a?dl=0
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball) and
basic functionality on your platform, and let us know how it
24 matches
Mail list logo