On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 5:48:20 AM WEST Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Done at d4ca8d74.
Thank you Enrico. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:04:53AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Please commit.
Done at d4ca8d74.
--
Enrico
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:55:24AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:41:47PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > José? Can you review and test this patch before Monday? If you do so,
> > please give an explicit +1 if you support the inclusion of it for 2.2.0.
>
> I
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:55:24AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> BTW, the patch does not apply cleanly anymore.
Updated patch attached.
--
Enrico
diff --git a/development/FORMAT b/development/FORMAT
index 9384409..01319df 100644
--- a/development/FORMAT
+++ b/development/FORMAT
@@ -11,6
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:41:47PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> José? Can you review and test this patch before Monday? If you do so,
> please give an explicit +1 if you support the inclusion of it for 2.2.0.
I think that you should take the responsibility of making a decision.
The worst
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:53:12PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 20/03/2016 20:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:33:32AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >>>
> >>>The attached patch introduces a
Le 20/03/2016 20:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:33:32AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
The attached patch introduces a new kind of separator, the latexpar
separator. This is exactly the same as the
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:10:58PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:33:32AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > The attached patch introduces a new kind of separator, the latexpar
> > separator. This is exactly the same as the old parbreak one and the
> > only
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:33:32AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> The attached patch introduces a new kind of separator, the latexpar
> separator. This is exactly the same as the old parbreak one and the
> only difference is the way parbreak and latexpar kinds are represented
> on screen.
Thanks, Enrico,
I appreciate your efforts here as well as your explanation. If I may make a
further request, it is to update the documentation. Prior to posting I did
read the release notes and lyx beamer documentation, and the connection
between the new parbreak and beamer separator was not
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 06:17:33PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 11/03/2016 18:01, José Matos a écrit :
> >On Friday, March 11, 2016 05:52:46 PM Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >>What about drawing this inset differently when it is alone in its paragraph?
> >
> >I would be happy. :-)
> >
>
> Or
Le 11/03/2016 18:01, José Matos a écrit :
On Friday, March 11, 2016 05:52:46 PM Guillaume Munch wrote:
What about drawing this inset differently when it is alone in its paragraph?
I would be happy. :-)
Or adapt lyx2lyx to convert the old separator into the plain separator
followed by the
On Friday, March 11, 2016 05:52:46 PM Guillaume Munch wrote:
> What about drawing this inset differently when it is alone in its paragraph?
I would be happy. :-)
--
José Abílio
Le 11/03/2016 17:28, José Matos a écrit :
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:48:58 PM Enrico Forestieri wrote:
In a nutshell, the old separator layout has gone and now a separator
inset is used in its place. Given that the old separator layout was
introducing a blank line in the latex output, in
On Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:48:58 PM Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> In a nutshell, the old separator layout has gone and now a separator
> inset is used in its place. Given that the old separator layout was
> introducing a blank line in the latex output, in order to not change
> the output, all
Hi Eran,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:53:22PM -0700, Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
> The implementation of separators in this version is a little different and
> confusing. Frame separators that show up as lines in 2.1 appear as an
> unfamiliar character, but not as a separator in the paragraph style. In
>
The implementation of separators in this version is a little different and
confusing. Frame separators that show up as lines in 2.1 appear as an
unfamiliar character, but not as a separator in the paragraph style. In
fact, separators don't appear with the rest of the styles on the left, and
it
17 matches
Mail list logo
