Op 23-07-19 om 07:41 schreef Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Am Dienstag, den 23.07.2019, 06:40 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
I see. This makes sense. I will update the docs.
This is what I came up with:
Right-to-left cursor movement: Here you can define how cursor movement
(with the arrow keys
Am Dienstag, den 23.07.2019, 06:40 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I see. This makes sense. I will update the docs.
This is what I came up with:
Right-to-left cursor movement: Here you can define how cursor movement
(with the arrow keys) behaves when writing scripts with right-to-l
ve
> direction (such as a couple of RTL words in LTR text) than with
> those
> words the cursor movement is going backwards, following the direction
> of
> the text, but also following the logic of what is forwards and
> backwards
> of the surrounding text.
>
> With v
in the paragraph a few words have an alternative
direction (such as a couple of RTL words in LTR text) than with those
words the cursor movement is going backwards, following the direction of
the text, but also following the logic of what is forwards and backwards
of the surrounding text.
With visual
Le 22/07/2019 à 18:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 12:30 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
I wanted to add a tooltip to the RTL cursor movement items in Prefs >
Language, but I am unable to find out what it actually does. I would
expect that the left/right ar
Le 22/07/2019 à 18:58, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 12:30 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
I wanted to add a tooltip to the RTL cursor movement items in Prefs >
Language, but I am unable to find out what it actually does. I would
expect that the left/right ar
Am Sonntag, den 21.07.2019, 12:30 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I wanted to add a tooltip to the RTL cursor movement items in Prefs >
> Language, but I am unable to find out what it actually does. I would
> expect that the left/right arrow keys behave differently in RTL
> cont
I wanted to add a tooltip to the RTL cursor movement items in Prefs >
Language, but I am unable to find out what it actually does. I would
expect that the left/right arrow keys behave differently in RTL context
depending on whether "Logical" or "Visual" is selected,
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I looked for a better way to find out whether an inset has a context
> menu and did not find one. Note that display math does not seem to have
> a context name but does have a context menu.
>
> I did significant testing with the patch and it works well.
Thanks for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So when left-clicking insets will not have the same behavior depending
> on them having a context menu?
Yes, but I could not find an inset where this matters. I originally tried to
use the mouse button information last year, but unfortunately I do not
remember
Le 14/03/2016 21:55, Georg Baum a écrit :
Yes. I am sorry, but this bug fix (which initially looked trivial) turned
out to be really delicate.
This is why I was glad to let you try it :)
The problem is that the fixup b70f2eff is incomplete: It does not consider
insets which do not have a
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:55:24PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Can you reproduce?
>
> The problem is that the fixup b70f2eff is incomplete: It does not consider
> insets which do not have a dialog, but a context menu. The attached patch
> fixes this for me. OK to go
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I think this caused the following change in behavior for me: it is
> possible for me to get the context menu when right-clicking on a newline
> inset but to have the options greyed out. I think this happens more
> often when I right-click on the far right of the red,
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:26:16PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> commit 359aef92f87169ce2683e287bb24bc3d5f46a190
> Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org>
> Date: Sun Oct 11 14:21:45 2015 +0200
>
> Fix cursor movement for large logos (#9628)
>
> Previously, if o
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I think this commit caused a regression in context menus. From what I
> understand, the old behavior was that when there was a right-click over
> an inset LyX would move the cursor just in front of the inset which is
> how LyX would know which context menu to show. With
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:45:29AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > I think this commit caused a regression in context menus. From what I
> > understand, the old behavior was that when there was a right-click over
> > an inset LyX would move the cursor just in front of the
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 02:26:16PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> commit 359aef92f87169ce2683e287bb24bc3d5f46a190
> Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org>
> Date: Sun Oct 11 14:21:45 2015 +0200
>
> Fix cursor movement for large logos (#9628)
>
> Previously, if o
Le 11/10/2015 14:56, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 11/10/2015 13:26, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 359aef92f87169ce2683e287bb24bc3d5f46a190
Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org>
Date: Sun Oct 11 14:21:45 2015 +0200
Fix cursor movement for large logos (#9628)
Previously, if one c
Le 11/10/2015 13:26, Georg Baum a écrit :
commit 359aef92f87169ce2683e287bb24bc3d5f46a190
Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org>
Date: Sun Oct 11 14:21:45 2015 +0200
Fix cursor movement for large logos (#9628)
Previously, if one clicked onto a large non-editable inset like the n
Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Thanks. Can this be easily adapted for
> <http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9748> ?
I don't think so. Cursor movement in math is a quite separate
implementation.
Georg
and
change the language from Arabic to English, nothing changes (note I still
have logical cursor movement set). From what I understand from your
above explanation, after the change, in Arabic right arrow means move
forward. But if I put the cursor at the beginning of the document (e.g
guage that is RtL?
> >> If that is the case, then why when I go to the document settings and
> >> change the language from Arabic to English, nothing changes (note I still
> >> have "logical" cursor movement set). From what I understand from your
> >> ab
? If
that is the case, then why when I go to the document settings and change the
language from Arabic to English, nothing changes (note I still have logical
cursor movement set). From what I understand from your above explanation,
after the change, in Arabic right arrow means move forward. But if I put
still have
logical cursor movement set). From what I understand from your above
explanation, after the change, in Arabic right arrow means move forward.
But if I put the cursor at the beginning of the document (e.g. with ctrl +
home), which is in Arabic, Left arrow moves forward and Right
anguage that is RtL? If
> that is the case, then why when I go to the document settings and change the
> language from Arabic to English, nothing changes (note I still have "logical"
> cursor movement set). From what I understand from your above explanation,
> after the change, in
>> language from Arabic to English, nothing changes (note I still have
>> "logical" cursor movement set). From what I understand from your above
>> explanation, after the change, in Arabic "right arrow" means "move forward".
>> But if I put the cu
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Lior Silberman wrote:
Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
got the expected result. Visual cursor movement means left and
right arrow keys always move the cursor left and right. The logical
behaviour is as follows:
1
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 11:57:36AM -0700, Lior Silberman wrote:
> Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
> got the expected result. "Visual" cursor movement means left and
> right arrow keys always move the cursor left and right. The &q
Le 04/07/2015 14:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I have no experience with how this is supposed to work, but I would like
to confirm that this behavior is expected:
1. In Tools Preferences Language Settings, set Cursor movement to
Logical (by the way, a tooltip here might be useful).
2. Open
Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
got the expected result. Visual cursor movement means left and
right arrow keys always move the cursor left and right. The logical
behaviour is as follows:
1. If the document is LtR and there is text is RtL then right arrow
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Lior Silberman lior3.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
got the expected result. Visual cursor movement means left and
right arrow keys always move the cursor left and right. The logical
behaviour
Le 04/07/2015 14:38, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I have no experience with how this is supposed to work, but I would like
to confirm that this behavior is expected:
1. In Tools > Preferences > Language Settings, set "Cursor movement" to
"Logical" (by the way, a toolti
Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
got the expected result. "Visual" cursor movement means left and
right arrow keys always move the cursor left and right. The "logical"
behaviour is as follows:
1. If the document is LtR and there is tex
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Lior Silberman <lior3.1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tested with LyX 2.1.3 (so with my own file, not the attachment) and
> got the expected result. "Visual" cursor movement means left and
> right arrow keys always move the cursor left
I have no experience with how this is supposed to work, but I would like
to confirm that this behavior is expected:
1. In Tools Preferences Language Settings, set Cursor movement to
Logical (by the way, a tooltip here might be useful).
2. Open the attached file.
3. In Arabic, when I press Right
I have no experience with how this is supposed to work, but I would like
to confirm that this behavior is expected:
1. In Tools > Preferences > Language Settings, set "Cursor movement" to
"Logical" (by the way, a tooltip here might be useful).
2. Open the attached file.
On 02/27/2015 04:54 PM, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
I think Richard is talking about what you are interested in, which is this bug
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2346
which was fixed by Alfredo and is in 2.2dev but is not
On 02/27/2015 04:54 PM, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I think Richard is talking about what you are interested in, which is this bug
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2346
which was fixed by Alfredo and is in 2.2dev but is not
Le 26/02/2015 16:16, Richard Heck a écrit :
The release notes for new version 2.1.3 mention inset-select-all,
which may be related (but isn't the whole story).
I think we did not put this into stable, as it touched a lot of code.
But if someone would like to prepare a patch, I'd be happy to
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 02/25/2015 07:02 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
I think Richard is talking about what you are interested in, which is this bug
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2346
which was fixed by Alfredo and is in 2.2dev but is not in 2.1.3.
Yes, maybe also #9289 and #9291
A/
Le 26/02/2015 16:16, Richard Heck a écrit :
The release notes for new version 2.1.3 mention "inset-select-all",
which may be related (but isn't the whole story).
I think we did not put this into stable, as it touched a lot of code.
But if someone would like to prepare a patch, I'd be happy to
:)
>>>>
>>>> ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me
>>>
>>> nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
>>> predictable and requiring less conscious control. But the key-based
>>> m
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I think Richard is talking about what you are interested in, which is this bug
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/2346
> which was fixed by Alfredo and is in 2.2dev but is not in 2.1.3.
Yes, maybe also #9289 and #9291
A/
On 02/25/2015 07:02 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me
nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:02 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me
nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:02 AM, <mark.braving...@csiro.au> wrote:
> Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, <mark.braving...@csiro.au> wrote:
>> > I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
>> >
>> > ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules&q
On 02/25/2015 07:02 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, <mark.braving...@csiro.au> wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me
nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movem
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me nuts!
I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
requiring less conscious control
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me
nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
predictable and requiring less conscious control
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, <mark.braving...@csiro.au> wrote:
> I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
>
> ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me nuts!
> I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:33 PM, <mark.braving...@csiro.au> wrote:
> > I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
> >
> > ... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me
> nuts! I dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more
>
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement rules drive me nuts! I
dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
requiring less conscious control. But the key-based motion actually feels quite
unpredictable and--- crucially
I am a LyX lover. However ... :)
... inside equations and tables, Lyx's cursor movement "rules" drive me nuts! I
dislike mousing, and prefer cursor-movement keys as more predictable and
requiring less conscious control. But the key-based motion actually feels quite
unp
As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools Preferences
Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
Andrew
I will need to have a look. I have did quite some work in this area to
check whether the instant preview is shown in the correct view,
whether the inset is being
On 11/04/2014 7:11 p.m., Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools Preferences
Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
Andrew
I will need to have a look. I have did quite some work in this area to
check whether the instant preview is
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, aparsloe apars...@clear.net.nz wrote:
On 11/04/2014 7:11 p.m., Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools Preferences
Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
Andrew
I will need to have a look. I have
On 04/11/2014 05:36 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Yes, I carefully copy-pasted the bug when I created the InsetPreview ;).
Perfect!
Richard
>
> As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools > Preferences >
> Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
>
> Andrew
>
I will need to have a look. I have did quite some work in this area to
check whether the instant preview is shown in the correct view,
whether the inset is
On 11/04/2014 7:11 p.m., Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools > Preferences >
Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
Andrew
I will need to have a look. I have did quite some work in this area to
check whether the instant preview is
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:30 AM, aparsloe wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2014 7:11 p.m., Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>>
>>> As a matter of interest, is Instant Preview on in Tools > Preferences >
>>> Display? If I turn it off, the problem vanishes.
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>> I will
On 04/11/2014 05:36 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Yes, I carefully copy-pasted the bug when I created the InsetPreview ;).
Perfect!
Richard
screen (it seems to need to
be about two lines off screen), mouse-driven cursor movement in the
formula in the left view becomes available again.
(I've also put this on the user's list to see if someone else with a
Windows machine can reproduce it.)
Andrew
On 7/04/2014 2:21 p.m., Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:55 PM, aparsloe wrote:
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now
mula in the right view scrolls off screen (it seems to need to
be about two lines off screen), mouse-driven cursor movement in the
formula in the left view becomes available again.
(I've also put this on the user's list to see if someone else with a
Windows machine can reproduce it.)
Andrew
On 7/04/2014 2:21 p.m., Richard Heck wrote:
On 04/06/2014 08:55 PM, aparsloe wrote:
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with the mouse* between, say, m and c. I find the cursor remains
stuck at the start of
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with the mouse* between, say, m and c. I find
On 04/06/2014 08:55 PM, aparsloe wrote:
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with the mouse* between, say, "m" and "c". I find the cursor remains
stuck at the start
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with the mouse* between, say, "m" and "c". I
On 04/06/2014 08:55 PM, aparsloe wrote:
On 7/04/2014 12:47 p.m., aparsloe wrote:
In a new document open a math inset and enter e=mc^2. Split the view
into left and right views. In the right view ensure the cursor lies
*outside* the math inset. Now in the left view try to put the cursor
*with
Hi,
if I start LyX with -dbg undo, why do I get the creation of 3 undo
groups for each single (read-only) cursor movement ?
For example, just moving right over a letter, gives me:
Undo.cpp(498): +++Creating new group 11
Undo.cpp(511): ---End of group 11
Undo.cpp(498): +++Creating
Le 29/09/2011 00:25, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
if I start LyX with -dbg undo, why do I get the creation of 3 undo
groups for each single (read-only) cursor movement ?
Not sure, but this is not a problem per se. creating an undo group is
just incrementing an integer, no memory is allocated
Hi,
if I start LyX with -dbg undo, why do I get the creation of 3 undo
groups for each single (read-only) cursor movement ?
For example, just moving right over a letter, gives me:
Undo.cpp(498): +++Creating new group 11
Undo.cpp(511): ---End of group 11
Undo.cpp(498): +++Creating
Le 29/09/2011 00:25, Tommaso Cucinotta a écrit :
if I start LyX with -dbg undo, why do I get the creation of 3 undo
groups for each single (read-only) cursor movement ?
Not sure, but this is not a problem per se. "creating an undo group" is
just incrementing an integer, no memory is
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Committed:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22928
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22929
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22930
don't forget to add some entry into wiki news for 1.6 :)
pavel
Right, thanks for the reminder! Couldn't do it tonight, though, because
of the
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Committed:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22928
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22929
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22930
don't forget to add some entry into wiki news for 1.6 :)
pavel
Right, thanks for the reminder! Couldn't do it tonight, though, because
of the
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached please find the latest versions of the visual mode for bidi
cursor movement patches. I fixed them up based on feedback (mainly from
Pavel and Abdel --- thanks!) Also, right movement is now included as
well. If there are no objections I will commit soon.
I
Committed:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22928
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22929
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22930
don't forget to add some entry into wiki news for 1.6 :)
pavel
Dov Feldstern wrote:
Hi!
Attached please find the latest versions of the visual mode for bidi
cursor movement patches. I fixed them up based on feedback (mainly from
Pavel and Abdel --- thanks!) Also, right movement is now included as
well. If there are no objections I will commit soon.
I
> Committed:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22928
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22929
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/22930
don't forget to add some entry into wiki news for 1.6 :)
pavel
Hi!
Attached please find the latest versions of the visual mode for bidi
cursor movement patches. I fixed them up based on feedback (mainly from
Pavel and Abdel --- thanks!) Also, right movement is now included as
well. If there are no objections I will commit soon.
I believe that once I
Hi!
Attached please find the latest versions of the visual mode for bidi
cursor movement patches. I fixed them up based on feedback (mainly from
Pavel and Abdel --- thanks!) Also, right movement is now included as
well. If there are no objections I will commit soon.
I believe that once I
Dov Feldstern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
For the past few months I've been working on visual mode for bidi
cursor movement. After a few false starts, I finally feel that I've
got an implementation which is relatively clean. It's not totally
finished yet, but it is well enough along
Dov Feldstern wrote:
b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because it
uses the bidi tables, which will not be computed in the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because
it uses the bidi tables, which will not be
Dov Feldstern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> For the past few months I've been working on visual mode for bidi
> cursor movement. After a few false starts, I finally feel that I've
> got an implementation which is relatively clean. It's not totally
> finished ye
Dov Feldstern wrote:
b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because it
uses the bidi tables, which will not be computed in the
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Dov Feldstern wrote:
b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because
it uses the bidi tables, which will not be
b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because it
uses the bidi tables, which will not be computed in the non-rtl_support
case).
Hi!
For the past few months I've been working on visual mode for bidi cursor
movement. After a few false starts, I finally feel that I've got an
implementation which is relatively clean. It's not totally finished yet,
but it is well enough along to submit for comments.
Attached are three
> b. Probably the visual_cursor option should only be enabled if
> rtl_support is on --- if rtl_support is false, visual_cursor should
> definitely be false, and should be disabled in the GUI (only because it
> uses the bidi tables, which will not be computed in the non-rtl_support
> case).
Hi!
For the past few months I've been working on visual mode for bidi cursor
movement. After a few false starts, I finally feel that I've got an
implementation which is relatively clean. It's not totally finished yet,
but it is well enough along to submit for comments.
Attached are three
Bo Peng wrote:
Jurgen: Please test this patch, because I am notorious at introducing
bugs to the branch. :-)
;-)
I'll do.
Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote:
> Jurgen: Please test this patch, because I am notorious at introducing
> bugs to the branch. :-)
;-)
I'll do.
Jürgen
Dear all,
The attached patch addresses the following problem:
line1
line2line break
empty line
line 3
1. Click after line2, the cursor moves to the empty line (unnatural behavior)
2. from the end of line1, down arrow moves the cursor to the empty
line, instead of end of line2 (unnatural
Dear all,
The attached patch addresses the following problem:
line1
line2
line 3
1. Click after line2, the cursor moves to the empty line (unnatural behavior)
2. from the end of line1, down arrow moves the cursor to the empty
line, instead of end of line2 (unnatural behavior)
3. continue from
Is this a feature or bug? Can anyone confirm?
i can confirm this.
1. Enter a paragraph like this
the first line (no line break)
the second line (line break Ctrl-break)
i interpreted this as line break done via Ctl-break)
(blank line with regular break)
the second paragraph
2. Move
On Jan 23, 2008 4:48 AM, Pavel Sanda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a feature or bug? Can anyone confirm?
i can confirm this.
I think the problem is that when pressing down arrow at the end of
first line, it should go to the end of the second line, not the third.
Bo
1 - 100 of 640 matches
Mail list logo