Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one of my Cygwin systems. make install-recursive make[5]: Entering directory `/home/ksylvan/src/lyx-build/src/frontends/xforms' Making install in forms make[6]: Entering directory

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one | of my Cygwin systems. have you tried a clean distclean maintianerclean to see if that helps? Or are there different versions of cygwin? -- Lgb

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one of my Cygwin systems. { [ ../../../../../lyx/src/frontends/xforms/forms != . ] [ ! -a form_aboutlyx.fd ] [: form_aboutlyx.fd: unknown operand Lars has added this bit of magic recently to

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh | means sh, not bash. So I can use -e instead? Not if you want plain old 'sh' to understand

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh | means sh, not bash. So I can use -e instead? |

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where sh | means sh, not bash.

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does old 'sh' has a test built-in? | No, the bourne shell uses /bin/test. | test -f file ... | [ -f file ] ... | are equivalent. Is that what you mean? No, I just thought that /bin/test had '-e', but I use '-r' instead in the what I

Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one of my Cygwin systems. make install-recursive make[5]: Entering directory `/home/ksylvan/src/lyx-build/src/frontends/xforms' Making install in forms make[6]: Entering directory

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening on one | of my Cygwin systems. have you tried a "clean" "distclean" "maintianerclean" to see if that helps? Or are there different versions of cygwin? -- Lgb

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > Anyone have any ideas about this? Strangely, this is only happening > on one of my Cygwin systems. > { [ ../../../../../lyx/src/frontends/xforms/forms != . ] && [ ! -a form_aboutlyx.fd ] > [: form_aboutlyx.fd: unknown operand Lars has added this bit of magic

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is > | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where "sh > | means sh, not bash". > > So I can use "-e" instead? Not if you want plain old 'sh' to

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is >> | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where "sh >> | means sh, not bash". >> >> So I can

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> >>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> | My copy of 'unix in a nutshell' tells me that 'test -a' is >>> | specific to ksh, so this is going to break on systems where "sh >>>

Re: Cygwin lyx compile failure

2004-06-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Does old 'sh' has a test built-in? > | No, the bourne shell uses /bin/test. > | test -f file && ... | [ -f file ] && ... > | are equivalent. Is that what you mean? No, I just thought that /bin/test had '-e', but I use '-r' instead in