On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:23:27AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> That kicks us somewhere in the region of 365*30*3*2=~66k installs per year...
> Sure, especially the last two numbers are highly speculative, but you can
> easily recalculate with your own constants ;)
Complementary data points for
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:27:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/04/2024 ?? 06:55, Yu Jin a écrit :
> >Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > It was under svn, not git until few weeks
Le 11/04/2024 à 06:55, Yu Jin a écrit :
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> It was under svn, not git until few weeks back when we update our
infra.
> Now both git or trac can be used (I used
Le 10/04/2024 à 23:37, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
BTW since I inadvertedly broke windows installs (dictionary URLs need
to be fixed for new releases) and accidentally found that our trac log
exploded with warnings about inexisting paths - I was able to narrow down
number of unique attempts to
Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > It was under svn, not git until few weeks back when we update our infra.
> > Now both git or trac can be used (I used trac just because the conversion
> > patch was easier to
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> It was under svn, not git until few weeks back when we update our infra.
> Now both git or trac can be used (I used trac just because the conversion
> patch was easier to write, but feel free to use git if you want, it's the
> primary
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 09:22:43PM +0200, Yu Jin wrote:
> Yeah I just wanted to do that too, looks good, but it should also be
> backported to 2.4.x and 2.4.1-devel?
Already backported...
> I was just searching for a reason why trac is used there in the first place
> instead of
(I already had MikTeX installed...).
> > >
> > > This is what didn't work so far (during installation):
> > > * installation of dictionaries and thesauri in both Norwegian forms
> failed (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk)
> > > * installation of thesauri in US and GB English fa
didn't work so far (during installation):
> > * installation of dictionaries and thesauri in both Norwegian forms failed
> > (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk)
> > * installation of thesauri in US and GB English failed.
>
> This looks like a problem in our win installer.
>
hesauri in both Norwegian forms failed
> (Norsk Bokm??l, Nynorsk)
> * installation of thesauri in US and GB English failed.
This looks like a problem in our win installer.
Eugene, do dictionaries installation work for you now?
If they are not part of the package but we download them,
things migh
10 matches
Mail list logo
